本文選題：五四時期 + 中國早期馬克思主義者�。� 參考：《深圳大學學報(人文社會科學版)》2016年04期

【摘要】：應對不同時期、階段其他社會思潮的挑戰(zhàn),是馬克思主義中國化實踐中必須要破解的問題情境之一。以五四前后為例,面對西化派的挑戰(zhàn),中國早期馬克思主義者從多方面給予了積極性回應,如在歷史觀上,用唯物史觀回應了西化派的歷史進化論和文化決定論,初步回答了當時中國問題及其產(chǎn)生根源是什么的問題;在自由觀上,用社會主義自由觀回應了西化派資產(chǎn)階級自由觀,初步回答了當時中國問題如何解決以及向何處去的問題;在真理觀上,用馬克思主義真理觀回應了西化派實用主義真理觀,初步回答了馬克思主義是否具有真理性的問題;在文化觀上,用中西文化融合創(chuàng)新的觀點回應了西化派的文化整體觀和西方文化中心論,初步回答了中西文化如何處理以及是否需要以馬克思主義為指導的問題。這些回應,既向當時的民眾旗幟鮮明地傳遞了解決中國問題(包括中西文化的處理、社會意識形態(tài)格局的構建等方面)需要馬克思主義以及它具有解決中國問題的能力和品質這樣的信息;也在客觀上為之后的中國馬克思主義者提供了一種間接的警醒,即馬克思主義中國化不是一帆風順、一勞永逸的。
[Abstract]:To deal with the challenges of other social trends of thought in different periods is one of the problem situations that must be solved in the practice of Marxism in China. Taking the May 4th Movement as an example, in the face of the challenge of Westernization, early Chinese Marxists responded positively in many ways, such as historical materialism, historical evolution and cultural determinism. In the view of freedom, the socialist concept of freedom is used to respond to the Westernized bourgeoisie view of freedom, and the initial answer to the question of how to solve the Chinese problem and where to go at that time. In the view of truth, it responds to the pragmatic truth view of westernized school with Marxist truth view, and preliminarily answers the question whether Marxism has truth. In this paper, the author responds to the cultural holistic view of Westernization school and the western culture-centered theory with the view of the integration and innovation of Chinese and Western cultures, and answers the question of how to deal with Chinese and Western culture and whether Marxism should be the guide. These responses not only gave a clear-cut message to the people at that time to resolve the Chinese problem, including the handling of Chinese and Western cultures, The construction of social ideology) needs information such as Marxism and its ability and quality to solve China's problems. It also objectively provides an indirect warning to the Chinese Marxists after that. That is, Marxism in China is not plain sailing, once and for all.
【作者單位】： 淮北師范大學信息學院;上海師范大學知識與價值科學研究所;
【基金】：安徽省高校優(yōu)秀青年人才支持計劃重點項目“近現(xiàn)代中國化馬克思主義與自由主義的思想論戰(zhàn)研究”(gxyq ZD2016407) 安徽省高等教育振興計劃馬克思主義理論學科領航建設項目“馬克思主義基本原理”(Szzgjh2-6)
【分類號】：G02

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 姜們;重溫文化歷史 探討改革新路——評介《五四前后東西文化問題論戰(zhàn)文選》[J];w蕓，

本文編號：1914733