本文選題：馬克思文化理論 + 民族文化　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自15世紀(jì)以來(lái),各國(guó)各民族孤立、封閉的狀態(tài)被打破,全球化的經(jīng)濟(jì)交往逐漸形成,經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展也帶來(lái)了各國(guó)文化在全球范圍的交流與碰撞,隨著世界格局的改變,各國(guó)之間對(duì)抗模式的轉(zhuǎn)向,文化因素在世界交往中越來(lái)越重要,學(xué)術(shù)界也開始對(duì)文化進(jìn)行廣泛關(guān)注和討論。本文以馬克思主義的文化觀點(diǎn)為基礎(chǔ),探析文化內(nèi)在性特質(zhì)以及文化與文明異同性比較。人類實(shí)踐活動(dòng)體現(xiàn)了文化的內(nèi)在本質(zhì),在一定歷史條件下形成的生產(chǎn)方式與交換方式?jīng)Q定了文化應(yīng)該如何形成、生長(zhǎng)與發(fā)展,與此同時(shí)文化也表現(xiàn)出穩(wěn)定性與流動(dòng)性,必然性與獨(dú)立性既對(duì)立又統(tǒng)一的特性。同時(shí),文化的多樣性與復(fù)雜性使得本國(guó)民族文化在與他國(guó)文化的交往碰撞中不斷進(jìn)行著沖突和整合。一方面是文化霸權(quán)主義的存在,另一方面越來(lái)越多的大國(guó)已經(jīng)看到文化對(duì)于增強(qiáng)綜合國(guó)力和塑造政治形象的重要性,作為世界第二大經(jīng)濟(jì)體的中國(guó)同樣也在積極建構(gòu)對(duì)他國(guó)文化產(chǎn)生影響力、吸引力和輻射力的“世界性”文化。那么打造文化強(qiáng)國(guó)戰(zhàn)略,在始終堅(jiān)定馬克思?xì)v史觀與文化觀的前提下,首先發(fā)展具有先進(jìn)性的創(chuàng)新文化,辯證看待傳統(tǒng)文化和西方自由主義文化。其次是完成“自我”意識(shí)的覺醒,樹立民族文化的自覺、自信和自強(qiáng)。大工業(yè)的發(fā)展帶來(lái)了民族經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇的同時(shí)也受到了文化危機(jī)的挑戰(zhàn)。特別是以美國(guó)為首的西方國(guó)家打著“民主文明”的旗號(hào)試圖在全世界宣揚(yáng)他的普世價(jià)值,在強(qiáng)大的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支撐下,西方文化強(qiáng)權(quán)主義也帶來(lái)了民族文化的危機(jī)。面對(duì)這種世情,我們需要用馬克思辯證唯物主義正確看待文化危機(jī)中的威脅和機(jī)遇,吐故納新的進(jìn)行文化重建,促進(jìn)民族文化朝著更先進(jìn)更合理的方向發(fā)展前進(jìn)。本文創(chuàng)新的部分是,面對(duì)全球范圍內(nèi)各國(guó)文化交往的日益緊密和頻繁,如何讓本國(guó)文化在文化多樣性和復(fù)雜性沖擊下,依然能夠保有民族文化所蘊(yùn)含的獨(dú)特性,以此提高我國(guó)文化的吸引力和影響力,打造一條符合中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義實(shí)踐的強(qiáng)國(guó)之路,實(shí)現(xiàn)中華民族的偉大復(fù)興。
[Abstract]:Since fifteenth Century, the countries and nations have been isolated and closed, and the economic globalization has gradually formed. The development of the economic globalization has also brought about the exchange and collision of all cultures around the world. With the change of the world pattern, the transformation of the mode of confrontation between countries, the cultural factors are becoming more and more important in the world communication. On the basis of the cultural viewpoint of Marx, this paper analyzes the inherent characteristics of culture and the comparison of cultural and cultural differences. Human practice reflects the intrinsic essence of culture. The mode of production and the way of exchange formed under certain historical conditions determine how culture should be made. At the same time, culture also shows stability and mobility, and the inevitability and independence are both opposite and unified. At the same time, cultural diversity and complexity make the national culture conflict and integrate with the culture of other countries. On the one hand, the existence of cultural hegemonism, the other one is the existence of cultural hegemonism, and the other one is the existence of the culture hegemonism. More and more big countries have seen the importance of culture to strengthen the comprehensive national strength and shape the political image. As the second largest economy in the world, China is also actively constructing the "world" culture which has influence, attraction and radiation on the culture of other countries. Then, the strategy of building a cultural power is always firm Marx. On the premise of the view of history and culture, we first develop the innovative culture with advanced nature, treat the traditional culture and the western liberalism culture dialectically, then complete the awakening of the consciousness of "self", set up the self-consciousness, self-confidence and self strength of the national culture. The development of the big industry has brought the economic recovery of the people and the cultural crisis. In particular, the western countries, headed by the United States, try to publicize his universal values in the world with the banner of "democratic civilization". Under the support of a strong economic basis, Western cultural power has brought a crisis of national culture. Facing this situation, we need to treat cultural crisis correctly with Marx's dialectical materialism. In the face of the increasingly close and frequent cultural exchanges around the world, how to keep the national culture under the impact of cultural diversity and complexity is still able to retain the national culture. In order to improve the attraction and influence of Chinese culture, the unique character contained in our country will be made to build a great power which conforms to the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics and realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉林濤;;文化自信的概念、本質(zhì)特征及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[J];思想教育研究;2016年04期

2 林劍;;論民族文化的創(chuàng)新[J];江海學(xué)刊;2015年06期

3 郝立忠;;運(yùn)用唯物主義辯證法應(yīng)對(duì)全盤西化和文化復(fù)古兩大思潮的挑戰(zhàn)[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期

4 李鵬程;;文化危機(jī)三題[J];江海學(xué)刊;2014年03期

5 林劍;;論文化中的沖突性因素與非沖突性因素[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2013年07期

6 林劍;;文化全球化再思考[J];江海學(xué)刊;2013年04期

7 林劍;;也論文化的自覺、自信與自立[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2013年06期

8 林劍;;文化的生成與發(fā)展的決定論詮釋[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2013年06期

9 林劍;;文化研究的若干爭(zhēng)議之辨[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2013年05期

10 林劍;;論文化生成與發(fā)展中的必然性與相對(duì)獨(dú)立性[J];江漢論壇;2012年10期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 林劍;;民族文化并非都是世界文化[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 戴圣鵬;;中國(guó)文化復(fù)興道路中的兩大歧途:自由主義與復(fù)古主義[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1862750