發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-26 06:04

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 技術(shù) 文化 傳統(tǒng) 現(xiàn)代　出處：《江西社會(huì)科學(xué)》2016年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：技術(shù)與文化的關(guān)系并非一成不變。海德格爾和埃呂爾指出了現(xiàn)代技術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)技術(shù)的本質(zhì)區(qū)別,揭示了技術(shù)與文化關(guān)系的歷史性轉(zhuǎn)變。波斯曼和芒福德具體分析了技術(shù)與文化關(guān)系的轉(zhuǎn)變是如何形成的。斯蒂格勒對(duì)人與技術(shù)關(guān)系的考察,從根本上揭示了技術(shù)具有的文化重構(gòu)力量,回答了技術(shù)與文化關(guān)系的變遷何以可能。認(rèn)識(shí)技術(shù)與文化關(guān)系的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)變及其力量根源,對(duì)技術(shù)哲學(xué)、技術(shù)人類學(xué)及文化研究無(wú)疑都具有十分重要的意義。
[Abstract]:The relationship between technology and culture is not inflexible. Heidegger and Eliel point out the essential difference between modern technology and traditional technology. It reveals the historical change of the relationship between technology and culture. Perseman and Munford concretely analyze how the transformation of the relationship between technology and culture is formed. Stigler's investigation of the relationship between man and technology. It reveals the cultural reconstruction power of technology fundamentally, answers the possibility of the change of the relationship between technology and culture, recognizes the modern transformation of the relationship between technology and culture and its power root, and gives the philosophy of technology. There is no doubt that technical anthropology and cultural research are of great significance.
【作者單位】： 貴州大學(xué)哲學(xué)與社會(huì)發(fā)展學(xué)院;
【基金】：貴州大學(xué)文科重大科研項(xiàng)目“科技傳播與文化變遷”(GDZT2011009)
【分類號(hào)】：G05
【正文快照】： 國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界探討技術(shù)與文化關(guān)系的文獻(xiàn)不算少,但這些研究有一個(gè)不足,即不自覺(jué)地假定技術(shù)與文化的關(guān)系是不變的,至少?zèng)]有明確提出技術(shù)與文化關(guān)系的歷史轉(zhuǎn)變。從技術(shù)哲學(xué)的角度看,這是因?yàn)闆](méi)有認(rèn)識(shí)到現(xiàn)代技術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)技術(shù)的本質(zhì)不同。海德格爾等哲學(xué)家對(duì)現(xiàn)代技術(shù)的剖析表明,現(xiàn)代技術(shù)

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉s鷖，

本文編號(hào)：1464886