2019正值五四運(yùn)動(dòng)的第一百周年。一個(gè)世紀(jì)前,中國(guó)外交家在巴黎和會(huì)上首次對(duì)西方列強(qiáng)說(shuō)“不”,此次外交失敗觸發(fā)了國(guó)內(nèi)爆發(fā)五四運(yùn)動(dòng)。歷經(jīng)百年滄桑,中國(guó)已經(jīng)成為國(guó)際舞臺(tái)上擁有強(qiáng)大影響力的外交大國(guó)。然而,“忘記歷史意味著背叛”,今天我們?nèi)孕杌仡櫮嵌沃袊?guó)人被認(rèn)為是“東亞病夫”,中國(guó)遭受西方列強(qiáng)欺壓的外交歷史。中華民國(guó)時(shí)期是中國(guó)外交的一個(gè)重要?dú)v史階段,期間中國(guó)由列強(qiáng)侵占的半殖民地一躍成為強(qiáng)國(guó)之一,恢復(fù)了晚清嚴(yán)重受損的主權(quán)。這樣的外交成就與一群擁有美國(guó)教育背景的職業(yè)外交家們密不可分,如顧維鈞,顏惠慶,施肇基等。在中國(guó)內(nèi)憂外患的動(dòng)蕩時(shí)期,他們憑借流利的英語(yǔ),在國(guó)際法,國(guó)際政治等方面所受的職業(yè)訓(xùn)練和對(duì)西方外交的熟悉,在國(guó)際舞臺(tái)上嶄露頭角。然而,外交官的職業(yè)和西化的舉止使公眾對(duì)他們的品格產(chǎn)生懷疑,對(duì)他們的歷史評(píng)價(jià)也是褒貶不一。他們常常被抨擊為“賣國(guó)賊”,或淪為外交失敗的替罪羊�？紤]到這一歷史時(shí)期的重要性,他們的群體身份和個(gè)體差異是一個(gè)值得研究的課題。再者,研究中國(guó)處在不利地位時(shí)期的外交實(shí)踐能夠給新時(shí)期的中國(guó)外交家們以啟示。因此,本文旨在研究擁有留美背景的中國(guó)外交家的跨文化身份,并探索影響其跨文化身份形成的...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：71 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Rationale
    1.2 Purpose of the Study and Research Questions
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy
    2.2 U.S.-educated Chinese diplomats in the Republican China
    2.3 Intercultural Identity of Overseas Chinese Students
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Cultural Identity and Intercultural Transformation
    3.2 Bronfenbrenner's Process-Person-Context-Time Model
Chapter Four Methodology
    4.1 Study Approach
    4.2 Sample Selection and Data Collection
    4.3 Description of U.S-educated Chinese Diplomats
Chapter Five Intercultural Experience of USECDs
    5.1 Experience in Home Culture
        5.1.1 Zeitgeist in Modern China
        5.1.2 Family Background
        5.1.3 Chinese Traditional Education
        5.1.4 Chinese New-Style Education
    5.2 Intercultural Experience in the U.S
        5.2.1 Education Attainment in the U.S
        5.2.2 Social Activities in the U.S
    5.3 Intercultural Experience as Diplomats
        5.3.1 The Modernization of China's Diplomacy
        5.3.2 Intercultural Communication as Chinese Diplomats
Chapter Six Discussion
    6.1 Intercultural Identity Demonstrated in USECDs' Professional Career
        6.1.1 Diplomatic Professionalism
        6.1.2 Westernization
        6.1.3 Nationalism
        6.1.4 Individual Variation
    6.2 Identity Development of USECDs under PPCT
        6.2.1 Process
        6.2.2 Person
        6.2.3 Context
        6.2.4 Time
Chapter Seven Concluding Thoughts
    7.1 Policy Implications
    7.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Researches
Bibliography
附件



本文編號(hào)：3981868