爭論焦點(diǎn)和集團(tuán)重組——政府間談判階段的安理會(huì)改革
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-05 03:03
【摘要】：聯(lián)合國大會(huì)第62/557號(hào)決定標(biāo)志著安理會(huì)改革由"不限成員名額工作組"模式轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)檎g談判模式。在政府間談判階段,各種改革力量圍繞談判框架和談判原則展開了激烈交鋒。成員國主導(dǎo)原則得到了中國以及"團(tuán)結(jié)謀共識(shí)"集團(tuán)的積極支持。同時(shí),改革中的一些主要集團(tuán)也發(fā)生著分化和重組。在原有的四國集團(tuán)、"團(tuán)結(jié)謀共識(shí)"、非洲聯(lián)盟等國家集團(tuán)之外,L69集團(tuán)、小島國家聯(lián)盟等新的集團(tuán)也日益活躍起來。印度等國家領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的L69集團(tuán)試圖扮演協(xié)調(diào)各方立場的角色。非洲聯(lián)盟內(nèi)部的立場分歧有加劇的趨勢,成為影響改革進(jìn)展的一大變數(shù)。美國在這一階段調(diào)整了對(duì)印度"入常"的態(tài)度,拉攏印度制衡中國的意圖更加明顯。為此,中國在政府間談判中宜采取"低介入"的策略,防止安理會(huì)改革成為離間中印和中非關(guān)系的工具。
[Abstract]:Un General Assembly decision 62 / 557 marks a shift in Security Council reform from an "open-ended working group" model to an intergovernmental negotiating model. In the intergovernmental negotiation stage, various reform forces engaged in fierce confrontation around the negotiation framework and negotiation principles. The principle of membership dominance has been actively supported by China and the Uniting for consensus group. At the same time, some of the major groups in the reform are also divided and reorganized. In addition to the original Group of four, Uniting for consensus, the African Union and other groups of countries, the L69 Group, the Alliance of small Island States and other new groups are becoming increasingly active. The L69 group, led by countries such as India, is trying to play the role of coordinating the positions of all parties. There is a growing trend of divergence of positions within the African Union, which has become a major variable affecting the progress of reform. At this stage, the United States has adjusted its attitude towards India, and its intention to attract India to check and balance China is even more obvious. To this end, China should adopt a "low intervention" strategy in intergovernmental negotiations to prevent the reform of the Security Council from becoming a tool to separate China-India and China-Africa relations.
【作者單位】： 上海對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究項(xiàng)目“聯(lián)合國安理會(huì)改革與美國的選擇性支持政策研究”(12YJCGJW009)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D813.2
，
本文編號(hào)：2493208
[Abstract]:Un General Assembly decision 62 / 557 marks a shift in Security Council reform from an "open-ended working group" model to an intergovernmental negotiating model. In the intergovernmental negotiation stage, various reform forces engaged in fierce confrontation around the negotiation framework and negotiation principles. The principle of membership dominance has been actively supported by China and the Uniting for consensus group. At the same time, some of the major groups in the reform are also divided and reorganized. In addition to the original Group of four, Uniting for consensus, the African Union and other groups of countries, the L69 Group, the Alliance of small Island States and other new groups are becoming increasingly active. The L69 group, led by countries such as India, is trying to play the role of coordinating the positions of all parties. There is a growing trend of divergence of positions within the African Union, which has become a major variable affecting the progress of reform. At this stage, the United States has adjusted its attitude towards India, and its intention to attract India to check and balance China is even more obvious. To this end, China should adopt a "low intervention" strategy in intergovernmental negotiations to prevent the reform of the Security Council from becoming a tool to separate China-India and China-Africa relations.
【作者單位】： 上海對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究項(xiàng)目“聯(lián)合國安理會(huì)改革與美國的選擇性支持政策研究”(12YJCGJW009)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D813.2
，
本文編號(hào)：2493208
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2493208.html
最近更新
教材專著
