【摘要】："軟制衡",是因應(yīng)冷戰(zhàn)后針對美國的"硬制衡"的明顯缺位或不足,而于21世紀初開始頻現(xiàn)于國際關(guān)系領(lǐng)域的一個新概念。作為傳統(tǒng)制衡行為的變種,"軟制衡"有著明顯區(qū)別于"硬制衡"的戰(zhàn)略目標、理論邏輯和機制。次等大國之所以對美國采取"軟制衡"戰(zhàn)略,主要在于單極結(jié)構(gòu)壓力與制衡的實力"門檻"與美國霸權(quán)合法性的下降、應(yīng)對"硬制衡"的難題與實力性質(zhì)的變化,以及國際體系內(nèi)部要素與互動屬性的變更等五方面原因。中國和俄羅斯在聯(lián)合國安理會上就敘利亞問題進行的戰(zhàn)略協(xié)調(diào)與外交合作,便是反對美國的典型"軟制衡"實例。
[Abstract]:"soft checks and balances" is a new concept in the field of international relations since the beginning of the 21st century in response to the obvious absence or deficiency of "hard checks and balances" against the United States after the Cold War. As a variation of traditional checks and balances, soft checks and balances have distinct strategic objectives, theoretical logic and mechanism. The reason why the inferior powers adopt the strategy of "soft checks and balances" against the United States mainly lies in the "threshold" of unipolar structural pressure and the strength "threshold" of checks and balances, and the decline in the legitimacy of American hegemony, so as to cope with the problem of "hard checks and balances" and the changes in the nature of power. And the internal elements of the international system and the change of interactive attributes and other five reasons. Strategic coordination and diplomatic cooperation between China and Russia on Syria at the UN Security Council are typical examples of "soft checks and balances" against the United States.
【作者單位】： 山西師范大學(xué)歷史與旅游文化學(xué)院;山西師范大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：山西省高等學(xué)校哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)重點研究基地項目“西亞國際關(guān)系中的認同因素”(2012322)資助
【分類號】：D80;D871.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 吳俠;;土耳其介入敘利亞危機的政策探析[J];前沿;2013年22期

，

本文編號：2368591