北極治理模式的國際探討及北極治理實踐的新發(fā)展
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-29 18:29
【摘要】：近年來,北極成為國際熱點之一,國內外學術界圍繞北極治理進行了大量探索,提出種種方案,主要有"南極模式"、"制度綜合體模式"和"海洋法公約模式"等,但這些方案本身即存在問題,且面臨著實施層面的各種挑戰(zhàn)。北極治理的國際探討雖然沒有結論,但相關實踐已然向前邁進:以北極理事會為代表的區(qū)域性國際機制不斷強化;冰區(qū)航運管理規(guī)則的制定取得突破性進展;北冰洋核心區(qū)的漁業(yè)管理討論向國際社會開放。凡此種種表明,北極國家與其他重要利益相關體在很多領域存在著諸多共同利益,具體領域的治理可能優(yōu)于全面的綜合涵蓋,"領域化"比"區(qū)域化"更具可行性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the Arctic has become one of the international hot spots. The academic circles at home and abroad have made a great deal of exploration around the governance of the Arctic, and put forward various schemes, such as "Antarctic Model", "Institutional Synthesis Model" and "Law of the Sea Convention Model", etc. But the solutions themselves are problematic and face implementation challenges. Although there is no conclusion in the international discussion of Arctic governance, the relevant practice has moved forward: the regional international mechanism represented by the Arctic Council has been strengthened, the rules of shipping management in ice regions have made a breakthrough; Discussions on fisheries management in the core area of the Arctic Ocean are open to the international community. All this suggests that Arctic countries and other important stakeholders share many common interests in many areas, that governance in specific areas may be better than comprehensive coverage, and that "domainization" is more feasible than "regionalization".
【作者單位】： 中國海洋大學法政學院;
【基金】：2014年度國家社科基金重點項目“北極治理與中國參與戰(zhàn)略研究”(項目批準號:14AGJ001)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D815
，
本文編號：2298464
[Abstract]:In recent years, the Arctic has become one of the international hot spots. The academic circles at home and abroad have made a great deal of exploration around the governance of the Arctic, and put forward various schemes, such as "Antarctic Model", "Institutional Synthesis Model" and "Law of the Sea Convention Model", etc. But the solutions themselves are problematic and face implementation challenges. Although there is no conclusion in the international discussion of Arctic governance, the relevant practice has moved forward: the regional international mechanism represented by the Arctic Council has been strengthened, the rules of shipping management in ice regions have made a breakthrough; Discussions on fisheries management in the core area of the Arctic Ocean are open to the international community. All this suggests that Arctic countries and other important stakeholders share many common interests in many areas, that governance in specific areas may be better than comprehensive coverage, and that "domainization" is more feasible than "regionalization".
【作者單位】： 中國海洋大學法政學院;
【基金】：2014年度國家社科基金重點項目“北極治理與中國參與戰(zhàn)略研究”(項目批準號:14AGJ001)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D815
，
本文編號：2298464
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2298464.html
