講堂論學:梁漱溟特有的論學模式
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-13 20:22
本文選題:梁漱溟 切入點:學術典范 出處:《文史哲》2017年05期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:"五四"前后,中國新的學術典范大體定型,開始確立從提問到表述的一整套"規(guī)范"。梁漱溟恰于此時開創(chuàng)了一種與眾不同的講堂論學模式,即在"再創(chuàng)宋明人講學之風"的意義采用西來的"公開演講"新方式。他了解以說服與證明為要項的新論學方式,但嘗試了一種經(jīng)演講而成書的模式,因口頭講述而簡化新論證規(guī)范,往往不經(jīng)"證明"而直抒見解,實際挑戰(zhàn)了形成中的學術典范。這樣一種介乎于學院和"社會"之間的言說方式,雖與學界對話,卻不遵循"為學術而學術"的現(xiàn)代訴求,而帶有化民成俗的遺風,揭示出過渡時代里天下士與知識人身份定位和職責的緊張。
[Abstract]:Before and after the May 4th Movement, China's new academic model was set in general and began to establish a set of "norms" from questioning to expressing. That is to say, in the meaning of "reinventing the style of lecturing in Song and Ming dynasties", a new way of "public speaking" was adopted in the west. He understood the new way of learning by persuasion and proof, but tried a mode of making a book by means of speech. The simplification of new argumentative norms by oral narration, which tends to express one's opinions directly without "proof", actually challenges the emerging academic paradigm. Such a way of speaking between the college and the "society" is a dialogue with the academic community. However, it does not follow the modern demand of "learning for the sake of scholarship", but has the style of turning the people into vulgarity, which reveals the tension of the identity orientation and duty of scholars and intellectuals in the transitional period.
【作者單位】: 四川大學歷史文化學院;
【分類號】:K092
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 鄭大華;梁漱溟新儒學思想研究[J];近代史研究;1992年04期
2 賀照田;;從梁漱溟的視角看現(xiàn)代中國革命[J];中國圖書評論;2011年06期
相關會議論文 前1條
1 王悅;;梁漱溟與新儒家鄉(xiāng)治論傳統(tǒng)[A];第九屆北京大學史學論壇論文集[C];2013年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 周良發(fā);梁漱溟歷史哲學研究[D];安徽大學;2012年
,本文編號:1608013
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/1608013.html