本文關(guān)鍵詞： 日本漢學(xué) 疑古思想 文明史觀 “新史學(xué)”革命 古史辨運(yùn)動 中日學(xué)術(shù)交流　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：甲午戰(zhàn)爭之后的近20年的時間里,中日知識界的文化價值開始乾坤逆轉(zhuǎn),在傳統(tǒng)價值觀由崩潰走向虛無之后國內(nèi)開始出現(xiàn)“崇日”情結(jié),的其主要的表現(xiàn)是大規(guī)模的赴日留學(xué)活動開始增多,許多被日本翻譯、創(chuàng)造的新式“漢語”,被中國學(xué)者接受,并傳回中國。許多流亡海外的維新派、革命黨人都是受此風(fēng)潮的影響。如20世紀(jì)初,梁啟超在日本受到福澤諭吉的“文明觀”影響而宣傳的“新史學(xué)”革命;20年代初在新文化運(yùn)動背景下開展起來的的古史辨運(yùn)動,都是受到日式詞匯的影響,在日式的學(xué)術(shù)語境下產(chǎn)生的。這期間是中國現(xiàn)代學(xué)術(shù)由發(fā)展走向成熟的過程。隨著30年代開始,中日關(guān)系的迅速惡化,中國的民族危機(jī)不斷加深。中國的學(xué)人已經(jīng)在30年的時間里走向成熟,并擺脫唯日本馬首是瞻的學(xué)術(shù)狀態(tài),開始結(jié)合本國的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況,重新構(gòu)建本國的歷史學(xué)和民族學(xué)工作。日本的近代中國學(xué)的一個重要任務(wù)就是在“脫亞”思想的背景下“去中國化”。這起源于江戶時期出現(xiàn)的民族主義情緒。經(jīng)過江戶時期對朱子學(xué)的批判與改造,日本漢學(xué)在近代找通過西方科學(xué)觀念找到其去“中國化”的有力武器,即“文明史觀”和“蘭克史學(xué)”。以此為利器,福澤諭吉將中國看成是落后、野蠻、停滯的文化過渡,避之尤恐不及。而白鳥庫吉則從蘭克史學(xué)的方法論出發(fā),對中國古史產(chǎn)生懷疑,提出“堯舜禹抹殺論”,意在縮短中國的歷史。在學(xué)術(shù)的背后更有其為日本侵略服務(wù)的潛意識,更是自民族主義文化膨脹的結(jié)果。近代日本學(xué)者對中國文化的貶低和責(zé)難,其背后的目的還是對過去千年時間里要擺脫“東夷”身份的一種夙愿。在近代借以東西方兩大秩序體制的雙向利用,而達(dá)到其構(gòu)建日式的“大東亞新秩序”的目標(biāo)。日本中國學(xué)者便在此擔(dān)當(dāng)如何在傳統(tǒng)文化與近代文明間找到一個對接點(diǎn),讓日本成為近代領(lǐng)導(dǎo)東亞世界的“盟主”。
[Abstract]:In the nearly 20 years after the Sino-Japanese War, the cultural value of Chinese and Japanese intellectuals began to reverse, and after the collapse of traditional values to nothingness, there began to appear the complex of "worshipping Japan" in China. Its main manifestation is the large-scale study abroad activities began to increase, many by Japanese translation, the creation of the new "Chinese", was accepted by Chinese scholars, and sent back to China. Many reformists in exile overseas. The revolutionaries were all influenced by this trend. In 20th century, Liang Qichao was influenced by FukuzawaYukichi's "concept of civilization" and propagated the revolution of "new historiography" in Japan. In 20s, in the context of the New Culture Movement, the ancient history debate movement was influenced by Japanese vocabulary. This period is the process of modern Chinese academic development to maturity. With the beginning of 30s, Sino-Japanese relations have deteriorated rapidly. China's national crisis is deepening. Chinese scholars have matured in the past 30 years, and have begun to combine the reality of their country with the academic state of following Japan's lead. Reconstructing the History and Ethnology of Japan. One of the important tasks of modern Chinese studies in Japan is to remove China from China under the background of the thought of "defecting from Asia". This originates from the nationalism in the Edo period. Through the critique and transformation of Zhu Zi's studies in the Edo period. In modern times, Japanese Sinology found its powerful weapon of "Sinicization" through western scientific concepts, namely, "Historical View of Civilization" and "Rank historiography". As a sharp weapon, FukuzawaYukichi regarded China as backwardness and barbarism. The stagnation of the cultural transition, but Baiyao Kuji, based on the methodology of Lanke historiography, doubts about the ancient history of China, put forward the "Yao Shun Yu obliterated theory." It is intended to shorten the history of China. Behind the academic, there is more subconscious to serve Japanese aggression, and it is the result of the expansion of nationalist culture. The modern Japanese scholars belittled and criticized Chinese culture. The purpose behind it is still a long-cherished wish to get rid of the "Dongyi" identity in the past thousand years, and to make use of the two major order systems of the East and the West in modern times. To achieve its goal of building a Japanese-style "New order of Great East Asia", Japanese Chinese scholars are responsible for finding a docking point between traditional culture and modern civilization. Let Japan become the leader of the East Asian world in modern times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K091

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓東育;;甲午戰(zhàn)前清朝內(nèi)治環(huán)節(jié)的闕失與戰(zhàn)后中日落差分析[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2014年10期

2 楊棟梁;;在學(xué)識與良知之間:國策學(xué)者內(nèi)藤湖南的“支那論”[J];史學(xué)月刊;2014年07期

3 薛天依;;辛亥革命后內(nèi)藤湖南的中國認(rèn)識[J];外國問題研究;2014年02期

4 胡天舒;;內(nèi)藤湖南的中國觀——以《燕山楚水》為中心[J];歷史教學(xué)(下半月刊);2013年11期

5 李孝恮;;域外o"[x，

本文編號：1469166