本文關(guān)鍵詞：北朝史學(xué)考論　出處：《云南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 北朝 歷史撰述 史學(xué)政策 修史制度 政治控制

【摘要】： 北朝史學(xué)是魏晉南北朝時(shí)期學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展與裂變的一個(gè)重要組成部分,但以資料奇缺等種種緣故,常被治史學(xué)史者忽略。本文試圖對北朝史學(xué)作一相對全面的鳥瞰。上篇從北朝時(shí)期的史學(xué)撰述活動(dòng)考述入手,在了解眾多佚史的基礎(chǔ)上,觀察其發(fā)展軌跡及階段性特征。下篇將北朝史學(xué)置于學(xué)術(shù)與政治關(guān)系背景中考察,以揭示此期史學(xué)的特質(zhì)及其在古代史學(xué)發(fā)展過程中的地位和意義。 本文認(rèn)為,北朝史學(xué)起步早、發(fā)展慢,主要原因是受到政治嚴(yán)格的控制和摧殘。雖然北朝史學(xué)發(fā)展的深度和廣度與南朝史學(xué)相比略有遜色,但表現(xiàn)出獨(dú)特的視角和卓識(shí)。另外,北朝史學(xué)與現(xiàn)實(shí)政治關(guān)系密切,此期強(qiáng)大的君主集權(quán)勢力對史學(xué)進(jìn)行全方位的控制,使北朝史學(xué)無論意識(shí)形態(tài)還是史學(xué)機(jī)構(gòu)都處于當(dāng)局政府的嚴(yán)格監(jiān)管之下,因此形成官方史學(xué)與私家史學(xué)雙線發(fā)展而官方史學(xué)占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位的特點(diǎn)。北朝官、私史學(xué)都取得巨大成就,但總體來說,官方史學(xué)的形勢不斷加強(qiáng),而私家史學(xué)日趨式微。 北朝史學(xué)在君主集權(quán)下的發(fā)展特征直接影響到隋唐史學(xué)生態(tài)的形成。隋文帝開皇十三年詔令禁絕民間私撰國史和臧否人物,唐貞觀年間更建立起完備的官方史學(xué)系統(tǒng)和基本體制,這些都不同程度地繼承了北朝史學(xué)的特質(zhì)。在魏晉私家撰史風(fēng)氣興盛和隋唐官方史學(xué)開始占據(jù)史學(xué)生態(tài)強(qiáng)勢地位之間,北朝史學(xué)是一個(gè)必不可少的過渡。
[Abstract]:The history of the Northern Dynasty is an important part of the academic development and fission in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties, but due to the lack of information and other reasons. This article attempts to make a relatively comprehensive bird 's-eye view of the Northern Dynasty historiography. The first part begins with the historical writing activities of the Northern Dynasty period, on the basis of understanding many lost history. The second part puts the Northern Dynasty historiography under the background of academic and political relations to reveal the characteristics of this period and its position and significance in the development of ancient historiography. This paper holds that the history of the Northern Dynasty started early and developed slowly, mainly because of the strict control and destruction of politics, although the depth and breadth of the development of the historiography of the Northern Dynasty was slightly inferior to that of the Southern Dynasty. In addition, the Northern Dynasty historiography was closely related to the reality and politics, and the powerful monarchic centralization forces carried on the omni-directional control over the historiography in this period. So that the Northern Dynasty historiography is under the strict supervision of the government regardless of ideology or historical institutions, so the formation of official historiography and private historiography dual development and official historiography occupies a dominant position. Private historiography has made great achievements, but on the whole, the situation of official historiography has been strengthened, and private historiography is declining day by day. The development characteristics of the Northern Dynasty historiography under the monarch centralization directly affected the formation of the Sui and Tang dynasties historiography ecology. During the Tang Dynasty, a complete official historiography system and basic system were established. These all inherited the characteristics of the Northern Dynasty historiography to varying degrees. Between the prosperity of the Wei and Jin dynasties private writing history and the Sui and Tang dynasties official historiography began to occupy a strong position in historiography ecology, the Northern Dynasty historiography is an essential transition.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高賢棟;;北朝宗族譜牒述論[J];北方論叢;2007年05期

2 龐天佑;論魏收的門閥士族思想[J];常德師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

3 徐中原;;20世紀(jì)以來《水經(jīng)注》研究綜述[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

4 侯娟穎;;《洛陽伽藍(lán)記》創(chuàng)作背景及動(dòng)機(jī)淺論[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

5 陳橋驛;酈道元生平考[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);1988年03期

6 華林甫;論酈道元《水經(jīng)注》的地名學(xué)貢獻(xiàn)[J];地理研究;1998年02期

7 趙永復(fù);酈道元生年考[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1980年S1期

8 ;由《洛陽伽藍(lán)記》看北魏的中原法化[J];法音;1998年12期

9 賀雙非;淺論《水經(jīng)注》的歷史價(jià)值與深遠(yuǎn)影響[J];高等函授學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年01期

10 王薇;《十六國春秋》考略[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;1993年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 婁權(quán)鑫;北朝史官考[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

2 唐如明;鄧淵《國記》與北魏國史修撰[D];蘭州大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1439677