機(jī)械設(shè)備的國際比較及方法研究
[Abstract]:The International Comparison Program (ICP) is an international economic comparison activity led by the United Nations Statistical Commission, the World Bank and other international organizations. China's active participation is not only necessary for the maturity of international comparative projects, but also conducive to the steady development of China's economy.
The comparison of machinery and equipment is a difficult problem in the international comparison project, and there are still many problems to be solved. This paper takes this as the research object, and hopes to discuss the key and difficult points of the international comparison of machinery and equipment through the careful analysis of the international frontier research in this field. It also hopes that through the discussion of this paper, China will participate in the international comparison of the project. The basic structure of this paper is as follows:
The first chapter, introduction, mainly elaborates the research background, research content, topic significance and the structure of this paper.
Chapter two, the basic category of international comparison of machinery and equipment, mainly discusses the four basic processes of international comparison of machinery and equipment, expounds the working contents and staff involved in the four basic processes, evaluates the status and role of each process in the whole process, and has a comprehensive understanding of the international comparison of machinery and equipment.
Chapter three, the method and evaluation of the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005. It mainly discusses the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005 as the base period, studies the various methods involved in this round of comparison, and studies the problems of the methods involved in each process, sums up the specific problems, such as The neglect of second-hand equipment, the different types of data submitted, and the lack of consideration of the origin and so on.
Chapter Four: New proposals and evaluation of the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. On the basis of summarizing the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005, some suggestions are put forward for the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. In addition, on the basis of summarizing experience, a new round of International comparison of machinery and equipment is also made. The innovations in this paper, such as the Price Factor Method, are studied.
Chapter Five, the key and difficult points of international comparison of mechanical equipment. On the basis of the above discussion, the key and difficult problems in international comparison of mechanical equipment are further discussed and summarized, such as the formulation of product list, the quality assurance of price data of equipment products, the balance of product representativeness and comparability, and so on. A more appropriate method is summed up by edge comparison and the method of PPP summarization.
Chapter 6, conclusions and prospects. The conclusion part is a summary of the above analysis, mainly draws several conclusions, such as the choice of transnational brands, the use of product structure description tables and so on.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows: firstly, the basic process of international comparison of machinery and equipment is sorted out comprehensively, and the basic operation process of the whole international comparison project is simply understood through the process of the project comparison; secondly, the methods involved in each process are discussed in detail, and the existing problems are summarized and given. Corresponding suggestions and measures, at the same time, some innovations have been made on the related issues; Third, China has increased the current research on the international comparison of machinery and equipment. At present, Chinese scholars only study the overall ICP, but not on a certain project in-depth study, so I hope that through this study China can participate in the future. International Comparison of mechanical equipment is helpful.
Of course, there are still great shortcomings in this paper, because international comparative data is difficult to obtain, so this paper lacks specific data support, will be relatively empty, and in some methods, the problem of argument or wording is not in place, these need to be improved later, I will continue to study and improve.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:C829.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王玲;基于購買力平價(jià)(PPP)的中外經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力比較[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年07期
2 江健桐;國際比較項(xiàng)目的發(fā)展和初步評(píng)價(jià)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;1993年01期
3 余芳東;購買力平價(jià)和匯率方法的差異程度及其原因分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2003年08期
4 叢培華;;國際經(jīng)濟(jì)比較中量值統(tǒng)一的價(jià)值尺度——剖析聯(lián)合國ICP方法的缺陷[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2007年05期
5 余芳東;;關(guān)于世界銀行2005年ICP結(jié)果、問題及應(yīng)用的研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2008年06期
6 袁衛(wèi);邱東;任若恩;李善同;許召元;何新華;;專家詮釋ICP[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2008年06期
7 余芳東;;2011年新一輪國際比較項(xiàng)目(ICP)方法改進(jìn)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2011年01期
8 余芳東;當(dāng)前全球國際比較項(xiàng)目的現(xiàn)狀、問題及建議[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與預(yù)測(cè);2000年03期
9 余芳東;;我國參加國際比較項(xiàng)目(ICP)的演變歷程[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2012年08期
10 鞏斌;對(duì)我國參與國際比較項(xiàng)目的思考[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與咨詢;2003年05期
,本文編號(hào):2225645
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2225645.html