【摘要】：對(duì)于中國人而言，家向來不是一個(gè)固定的概念，，甚至沒有一個(gè)固定的形態(tài)。而由于社會(huì)的變遷，不同時(shí)期人們心目中的“家”必然也不盡相同。在家的觀念和形態(tài)隨著時(shí)間推移在代際間不斷地發(fā)生變化的同時(shí)，家庭中性別的權(quán)利作用機(jī)制也同時(shí)發(fā)生著演變。因此，筆者嘗試以代際比較的視角，對(duì)新中國成立以來，城市中不同代際間人們觀念中的“家”，他們的婚姻關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)，以及三代人家庭中男權(quán)作用機(jī)制的演變進(jìn)行研究。 筆者通過對(duì)新中國建國以來的家及其社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)的代際比較，一方面，增加關(guān)于家的實(shí)地研究；另一方面，將家置于社會(huì)變遷和社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)中思考，使人們更理性的看待家庭。 本文采用的研究方法有文獻(xiàn)法、訪談法和觀察法。通過對(duì)各種文獻(xiàn)包括學(xué)術(shù)和文學(xué)作品的閱讀和研究，歸納和總結(jié)與本論文研究相關(guān)的問題，比較不同視角下的研究狀況，了解各個(gè)時(shí)代背景，和本研究領(lǐng)域當(dāng)前的研究現(xiàn)狀，為本研究提供參考價(jià)值。在訪談中，筆者尤其注重對(duì)同一個(gè)大家庭三代小家庭各自的深度訪談。以此來對(duì)比不同代際間家與社會(huì)關(guān)系的連帶，尋找時(shí)代在家上刻下的烙印。 通過訪談研究筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)，不同代際間的家確實(shí)發(fā)生了一些變化。其一，家的范圍隨著時(shí)間的推移在代際間不斷的縮小，每一代的家庭模式存在一定的差異；其二，社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)中血緣親屬的作用不斷的弱化，人們的婚姻關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)的范圍不斷擴(kuò)大；其三，男權(quán)在這三代家庭中的作用機(jī)制也在發(fā)生著演變，家庭權(quán)利模式從不完全的合作制逐漸向成熟的合作制轉(zhuǎn)變。但是，作為一個(gè)古已有之的社會(huì)設(shè)置，家庭相對(duì)于其他的社會(huì)制度而言具有相對(duì)的穩(wěn)定性。家的一些基本特征并沒有隨著時(shí)間的推移和社會(huì)的變遷而發(fā)生改變，如家的基本功能及家的基本構(gòu)成要素等。
[Abstract]:For the Chinese, home has never been a fixed concept, or even a fixed form. Due to social changes, people in different periods of the "home" must be different. As the concepts and patterns of home change from generation to generation, the mechanism of gender rights in the family is also evolving at the same time. Therefore, from the perspective of intergenerational comparison, the author attempts to study the "home", the network of marriage relations and the evolution of the mechanism of male power in three generations of families in different generations of cities since the founding of New China. Through the intergenerational comparison of the family and its social network since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the author, on the one hand, increases the field study of the home, on the other hand, puts the family in the context of social change and social network. To make people more rational about the family. The research methods used in this paper are literature method, interview method and observation method. Through the reading and research of various literature, including academic and literary works, this paper summarizes and summarizes the problems related to the study of this paper, compares the research situation from different angles of view, understands the background of each era, and the current research situation in this research field. To provide reference value for this study. In the interview, the author pays particular attention to the three generations of the same extended family. This is to compare the intergenerational family and social relations, and to look for the imprint of the times at home. The author finds that some changes have taken place in different generations of homes. First, the scope of the family has been shrinking over time, and there are certain differences in the family patterns of each generation. Second, the role of blood relatives in the social network is constantly weakening. Third, the mechanism of male power in the three generations of families is also evolving, and the mode of family rights has gradually changed from incomplete cooperative system to mature cooperative system. However, as an ancient social setup, the family is relatively stable relative to other social systems. Some of the basic characteristics of the home have not changed with the passage of time and social changes, such as the basic functions of the home and the basic elements of the home, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：C913.11

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王思斌;經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革對(duì)農(nóng)村社會(huì)關(guān)系的影響[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年03期

2 左際平;;從婚姻歷程看中國傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)中家庭男權(quán)的復(fù)雜性[J];婦女研究論叢;2012年03期

3 王躍生;;個(gè)體家庭、網(wǎng)絡(luò)家庭和親屬圈家庭分析——?dú)v史與現(xiàn)實(shí)相結(jié)合的視角[J];開放時(shí)代;2010年04期

4 李相珍;“文革”期間婚姻生活之我見[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

5 高清;;改革開放以來我國家庭的變遷與發(fā)展[J];攀登;2005年06期

6 李樹茁,Marcus W.Feldman;略陽縣兩類招贅婚姻類型的決定因素研究[J];人口研究;2002年01期

7 劉英;京津滬寧蓉五城市家庭調(diào)查初析[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1986年04期

8 譚深;城市“單位保障”的形成及特點(diǎn)[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1991年05期

9 李io;家庭政策與社會(huì)變遷中的中國家庭[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1991年05期

10 張永健;家庭與社會(huì)變遷——當(dāng)代西方家庭史研究的新動(dòng)向[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1993年02期

本文編號(hào)：2216174