發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-02 04:36

  本文選題：村 + “行政村”��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：“村”出現(xiàn)在東漢末期,在魏晉南北朝時(shí)期使用泛化,至唐朝時(shí)“村”制被正式確立�！按濉笔且粋�(gè)按照居住區(qū)域來(lái)劃分的單位,“村”制的形成是城鄉(xiāng)分治的結(jié)果,它不同于按照戶數(shù)來(lái)編制的治理單位。傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村治理是官治還是自治主要看四個(gè)方面：治理組織、治理區(qū)域(戶數(shù))、治理人員及經(jīng)費(fèi)和治理職能。村治的行政化主要是這四個(gè)要素的行政化過(guò)程。“行政村”是在“政權(quán)下鄉(xiāng)”的過(guò)程中形成的,“政權(quán)下鄉(xiāng)”始于20世紀(jì)初晚清與國(guó)民政府所推行國(guó)家政權(quán)建設(shè),但是在國(guó)家權(quán)力勢(shì)能無(wú)法延伸到末梢時(shí),自上而下地推行村落的行政化是注定要失敗的。中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨將農(nóng)民組織起來(lái),進(jìn)行自下而上的革命,建立一條有效的鄉(xiāng)村整合路徑,實(shí)現(xiàn)鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)的國(guó)家化治理：自上而下的治理層級(jí)、清晰化的行政區(qū)域、制度化的人員配備及經(jīng)費(fèi)支持、代表國(guó)家意志的行政活動(dòng)。“行政村”指國(guó)家基于治理需要,對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村所實(shí)行的條塊化、區(qū)域化劃分,具有行政建制性的治理單位。權(quán)力的下沉和滲透,將村落的自然屬性轉(zhuǎn)為行政性。1949—1954年“行政村”完成了共和國(guó)成立初的農(nóng)村政權(quán)建設(shè)。此后,“行政村”的意義發(fā)生了變化,治理單位發(fā)生了區(qū)劃和實(shí)體的分離,“行政村”只作為行政區(qū)劃得以延續(xù),并且區(qū)域范圍被頻繁地調(diào)整,基于“行政村”這一區(qū)劃上的治理實(shí)體及職能體系也發(fā)生變遷。行政村是現(xiàn)代國(guó)家建構(gòu)下的產(chǎn)物,標(biāo)志著鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)國(guó)家化治理的開(kāi)始。
[Abstract]:Village appeared in the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, used in Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties, and was formally established in Tang Dynasty. "Village" is a unit that is divided according to the living area, the formation of "village" system is the result of urban and rural partition and it is different from the governing unit compiled according to the number of households. Traditional rural governance is government or autonomy mainly look at four aspects: governance organization, governance area (household number, governance personnel and funds and governance functions. The administration of village governance is mainly the administrative process of these four elements. The "administrative village" was formed in the process of "regime going to the countryside". "regime going to the countryside" began in the late 20th century and the national government carried out the construction of state power, but when the potential energy of state power could not be extended to the end, The top-down implementation of village administration is doomed to failure. The Communist Party of China organized the peasants, carried out the bottom-up revolution, established an effective rural integration path, and realized the nationalized governance of the local society: a top-down level of governance, a clear administrative region, Institutionalized staffing and financial support, representing the national will of the administrative activities. The "administrative village" refers to the administrative unit with administrative system, which is implemented by the country on the basis of the need of governance and the division of the administrative system and regionalization. With the subsidence and infiltration of power, the natural attribute of the village was transformed into administrative. 1949-1954 "administrative village" completed the construction of the rural regime at the beginning of the founding of the Republic. Since then, the meaning of "administrative village" has changed, and the division of administrative units and the separation of entities have taken place. The "administrative village" has been continued only as an administrative division, and the regional scope has been frequently adjusted. The governance entity and function system based on the district of "administrative village" have also changed. Administrative village is the product of modern country construction and marks the beginning of nationalization of local society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C912.82

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅義云;;“合村并組”應(yīng)慎行[J];調(diào)研世界;2006年07期

2 章義和;關(guān)于南朝村的淵源問(wèn)題[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

3 趙樹(shù)凱;鄉(xiāng)村治理:組織和沖突[J];河北學(xué)刊;2003年06期

4 徐勇;現(xiàn)代國(guó)家建構(gòu)中的非均衡性和自主性分析[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

5 鄧大才;;社會(huì)化小農(nóng):動(dòng)機(jī)與行為[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

6 徐勇;項(xiàng)繼權(quán);;現(xiàn)代國(guó)家建構(gòu)中的鄉(xiāng)村治理[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

7 徐勇;;“行政下鄉(xiāng)”:動(dòng)員、任務(wù)與命令——現(xiàn)代國(guó)家向鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)滲透的行政機(jī)制[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

8 葉麒麟;;現(xiàn)代國(guó)家建構(gòu)的多維度考量[J];理論研究;2009年Z1期

9 陶康;邱福林;;鄉(xiāng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中的困境——基于國(guó)家建構(gòu)的視角分析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年01期

10 吳理財(cái);;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)改革與后稅費(fèi)時(shí)代鄉(xiāng)村治理體制的構(gòu)建[J];中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1967427