本文選題：學(xué)術(shù) + 政治�。� 參考：《北京大學(xué)教育評論》2012年03期

【摘要】：正無論是洪堡(Humboldt)"學(xué)術(shù)自由"的大學(xué)理念,還是韋伯(Weber)"作為志業(yè)的學(xué)術(shù)",亦或是默頓(Merton)的"科學(xué)精神規(guī)范",實(shí)際上都暗含著一種主張,即學(xué)術(shù)(wissenschaft)與政治無涉,恪守的是價(jià)值中立的原則,其中尤以自然科學(xué)為甚。然而,隨著學(xué)者們對自然、社會(huì)和人的認(rèn)識的深化以及相應(yīng)的對各個(gè)學(xué)科本身認(rèn)識的深入,這種主張逐漸地發(fā)生了松動(dòng),關(guān)于知識或思想的社會(huì)條件及其內(nèi)含的意識形態(tài)因素與政治因素也逐漸進(jìn)入學(xué)者的視野。盡管曼
[Abstract]:Whether it is Humboldt's university philosophy of "academic freedom" or Weber's "academic as a journal" or Merton Merton's "code of scientific spirit", it is actually implied that the academic wissenschafthas nothing to do with politics. Adhere to the principle of value neutrality, especially in the natural sciences. However, with the deepening of scholars' understanding of nature, society and people, and the corresponding deepening of the understanding of the various disciplines themselves, this proposition gradually loosened. The social conditions of knowledge or thought and their ideological and political factors gradually enter the field of vision of scholars. Although Mann
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學(xué)高等教育研究所;
【基金】：教育部哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)研究重大課題攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目(09JZD0036-1) 華東師范大學(xué)2011年全國優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文培育行動(dòng)計(jì)劃(PY201 1002)
【分類號】：C091
，

本文編號：1826873