本文選題：修辭社會(huì)學(xué) + 意會(huì)與正名　； 參考：《學(xué)習(xí)與實(shí)踐》2017年06期

【摘要】：雖然早期社會(huì)學(xué)共同體秉持客觀、科學(xué)的理念去研究社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,但言說(shuō)者、受眾者、情境以及語(yǔ)言等修辭承載要素仍在某種程度上與社會(huì)學(xué)的認(rèn)知實(shí)踐或建構(gòu)傳統(tǒng)相關(guān)聯(lián)。即使遭受到忽視或被邊緣化處理,修辭要素仍默默地支撐著社會(huì)學(xué)的發(fā)展傳統(tǒng)。在歷經(jīng)學(xué)術(shù)共同體的意會(huì)、正名和澄清階段之后,修辭社會(huì)學(xué)開(kāi)始浮出水面并得到學(xué)科共同體的認(rèn)可和重視。它在擴(kuò)展自身研究范疇的同時(shí)呈現(xiàn)出認(rèn)知分析范式和認(rèn)知建構(gòu)范式,從而能成為社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科發(fā)展過(guò)程中的學(xué)術(shù)活力。
[Abstract]:Although the early sociological community studied social phenomena with objective and scientific ideas, rhetorical factors such as speaker, audience, context and language are still related to the cognitive practice of sociology or the construction of tradition to some extent.Even if neglected or marginalized, rhetorical elements still silently support the sociological development tradition.After the stage of academic community's intention, name correction and clarification, rhetoric sociology began to emerge and was recognized and valued by the academic community.It not only expands the scope of its own research, but also presents cognitive analysis paradigm and cognitive construction paradigm, which can become the academic vitality in the course of the development of sociology.
【作者單位】： 華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)系;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)青年項(xiàng)目(16YJC840007)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：C91-0
，

本文編號(hào)：1743950