本文關鍵詞： 《詩經》 詩教 天人關系 古今之變 性情　出處：《同濟大學學報(社會科學版)》2014年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：《詩經》僅僅是一部言情詠懷的歌謠集子,還是富有倫理道德含義與政治教化含義的經典?《韓詩外傳》"陳情欲以歌道義"的思想提示我們,歌詠兒女情長的方面和諷喻道德教化的方面可能并不是矛盾的,而是相輔相成的。作為六經之一,《詩經》是天人一貫的。只看到其中任何一面都是不足以理解《詩》之為經的。現(xiàn)代《詩》學片面強調《詩經》屬人的一面,刻意剔除屬天的一面,反對詩教的倫理政教含義,不過是出于現(xiàn)代性的偏見。所以,現(xiàn)代《詩》學對古代疑經《詩》學的征引是完全誤置的。文章最后通過解讀《關雎》中的"逑"字大義,說明了《詩經》和古代《詩》學傳統(tǒng)是通天人、貫古今的文質彬彬形態(tài)。
[Abstract]:The Book of songs is just a collection of ballads, or is it a classic with moral and political implications? The thought of "Chen Lust and Song morality" reminds us that the aspects of singing about children and daughters and alleging moral enlightenment may not be contradictory. It is complementary. As one of the six Classics, the Book of songs is consistent between Heaven and Man. It is not enough to understand the Book of songs as a sutras only to see any of them. Deliberately dismissing the heavenly side and opposing the ethical, political and religious meaning of poetry is only due to the prejudice of modernity. The modern "poem" study is completely misplaced to the ancient sutras "poem" study. Finally, by interpreting the meaning of the word "Qiu" in Guan Ju, the paper explains that the Book of songs and the ancient tradition of "poetry" are all heavenly people. Throughout the ancient and modern style of politeness.
【作者單位】： 同濟大學人文學院;
【分類號】：C09;I207.22

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 閔順琴,盧和樂;《詩集傳》詞語訓釋商榷[J];阿壩師范高等�？茖W校學報;2003年04期

2 卜師霞;;《詩經·載馳》詩意考辨[J];阿壩師范高等專科學校學報;2007年03期

3 王碩民;《韓詩外傳》新論[J];安徽大學學報;2003年02期

4 何琳儀;，

本文編號：1510496