發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-19 05:04

  本文選題：農(nóng)民土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán) + 家庭土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)��； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：土地,民之本也,它是中國人民能夠生產(chǎn)生活的基礎(chǔ),也是作為農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)大國的中國的特色標(biāo)志。即使現(xiàn)在城市化進(jìn)程加快,國家不斷地鼓勵(lì)城市和農(nóng)村向一體化方向發(fā)展,但是“三農(nóng)”問題仍然是我們國家長期需要攻克的難題之一。最近一些年來,我國中央制定的政策著重加大改革的力度,其中農(nóng)民的土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn)等系列問題一直以來是法律學(xué)界研究的熱點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)。土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化是以土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度為基礎(chǔ)的土地流轉(zhuǎn)方式之一,也是近些年在農(nóng)村地區(qū)興起的土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的新方式。土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的股權(quán)化流轉(zhuǎn)制度對(duì)優(yōu)化農(nóng)地利用、促進(jìn)農(nóng)業(yè)市場(chǎng)化發(fā)展有著不可或缺的重要意義,但是目前學(xué)界對(duì)該制度的研究相對(duì)較少,對(duì)于這項(xiàng)制度的結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)也是眾說紛紜。筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的關(guān)鍵問題在于如何進(jìn)行制度的構(gòu)建,本文運(yùn)用民法和合作社法的基本理論,依據(jù)我國的相關(guān)法律條文的規(guī)定和中央關(guān)于農(nóng)村土地改革的政策以及各地的實(shí)踐,討論了農(nóng)民土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的實(shí)踐中的難點(diǎn)問題和基本理論問題。本文主要分為三章,對(duì)土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的股權(quán)化制度進(jìn)行研究。第一章,土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的價(jià)值定位。結(jié)合學(xué)者們對(duì)于股權(quán)化概念的不同認(rèn)識(shí)為基礎(chǔ),筆者認(rèn)為土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的內(nèi)涵應(yīng)界定為：土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)人以堅(jiān)持土地的集體所有權(quán)屬性為前提,將土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)作價(jià)入股農(nóng)村合作社進(jìn)行股份合作經(jīng)營,或者將家庭承包方式以外的“招拍協(xié)”方式取得的承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股公司企業(yè),從而取得所投資合作社或者公司企業(yè)的股權(quán)并以此獲得利益分配的土地流轉(zhuǎn)制度。關(guān)于土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化性質(zhì)的不同觀點(diǎn),即物權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)說、債權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)說和股權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)說,對(duì)其中的股權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)說表達(dá)了自己贊同的見解并且提出家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的股權(quán)化應(yīng)當(dāng)合作化的觀點(diǎn)。以法的公平和效率的價(jià)值理念為根基,分析了農(nóng)地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的法律價(jià)值的含義和平衡,提出了若想要構(gòu)建土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化這一法律制度,就應(yīng)當(dāng)把焦點(diǎn)集中到農(nóng)民與土地的依賴關(guān)系的特殊性上面,并且應(yīng)以公平價(jià)值為基礎(chǔ)、以效率價(jià)值為目標(biāo)進(jìn)行制度構(gòu)建和完善。第二章,土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定和基本原則。首先,從法律、部分規(guī)章、地方性法規(guī)以及國家政策等方面歸納總結(jié)了股權(quán)化的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定現(xiàn)狀,由此發(fā)現(xiàn)我國法律對(duì)農(nóng)地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的規(guī)定尚存較多漏洞和不足,應(yīng)加強(qiáng)對(duì)該制度難點(diǎn)問題的研究,為繼承和發(fā)展農(nóng)地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的股權(quán)化給予理論上的支持。其次,由于承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股已是公認(rèn)的土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的方式之一,所以根據(jù)農(nóng)地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的總體性原則,歸納總結(jié)出土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化制度應(yīng)恪守的原則理念。第三章,土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的難點(diǎn)問題。這一部分是本文的重點(diǎn)研究對(duì)象,分為土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股的內(nèi)容、土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股的作價(jià)及其在合作社財(cái)產(chǎn)中的地位、承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的期限對(duì)其股權(quán)化的影響等問題。首先,關(guān)于土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的內(nèi)容,提出在一般情況下,應(yīng)當(dāng)是指經(jīng)營權(quán)的入股,入股農(nóng)民仍保留土地承包權(quán)。但是,還有一種整體入股的觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,在符合一定條件下,經(jīng)過所在集體同意,也可以不區(qū)分承包權(quán)和經(jīng)營權(quán),而是將土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)進(jìn)行整體入股。其次,在對(duì)土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股作價(jià)時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)入股內(nèi)容的不同進(jìn)行作價(jià)并采取不同作價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——對(duì)于以經(jīng)營權(quán)能入股的,參照土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)出租的價(jià)格作價(jià)；對(duì)于以承包經(jīng)營權(quán)整體入股的,應(yīng)參照土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的價(jià)格作價(jià)。關(guān)于土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股合作社后的利益分配、抵押、破產(chǎn)清算等一系列問題,筆者認(rèn)為：第一,出于對(duì)土地的社會(huì)保障功能的考慮,土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化的利益分配可以實(shí)行“保底收入”與“浮利分紅”相結(jié)合的利益分配規(guī)則；第二,在允許土地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押的情況下,合作社可以以其取得的土地經(jīng)營權(quán)進(jìn)行抵押要基于農(nóng)戶的同意；第三,土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)不管是從社會(huì)保障的角度來看,還是從產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)來分析都不適于納入合作社破產(chǎn)財(cái)產(chǎn)進(jìn)行清算,筆者同意賦予農(nóng)戶“等額回購權(quán)”的做法。筆者論述了承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的期限性和承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的長久化對(duì)承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的股權(quán)化的影響和問題,并且提出了如何應(yīng)對(duì)入股作價(jià)、退股和利益平衡的見解,為未來土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化制度的發(fā)展與構(gòu)建提供了理論預(yù)期。
[Abstract]:Land and people are also the basis of the Chinese people's ability to produce life. It is also a symbol of China as a big agricultural country. Even now the process of urbanization is speeding up, and the state constantly encourages cities and rural areas to develop in the direction of integration, but the "three rural" problem is still one of the problems that our country needs to overcome for a long time. In recent years, the policy made by the central government has been focused on strengthening the reform. The circulation of land contracted management rights of farmers has always been a hot and difficult point in the study of the legal field. The ownership of the land contracted management right is one of the land transfer modes based on the system of land contract management right and also in recent years. A new way of transferring land contract management right in rural areas. The system of the transfer of the right of land contract management has an indispensable and important significance to optimize the utilization of farmland and promote the development of agricultural market. However, there are few studies on the system in the academic circles at present, and the structure design of this system is also different. The key problem of the ownership of the land contract management right is how to build the system. In this paper, the practice of the civil law and the cooperative law, the relevant provisions of the law in China and the central government's policy on rural land reform and the practice of various places are discussed in this paper, and the practice of the ownership of the farmers' land contract management right is discussed. This paper is divided into three chapters. This article is mainly divided into three chapters. The first chapter is the value orientation of the ownership of the land contract management right. The author thinks that the connotation of the ownership of the land contract management right should be defined on the basis of the scholars' different understanding of the concept of the shareholding. On the premise of adhering to the collective ownership property of the land, the owner of the contracted management of land takes the land contract management right as a share in the cooperative operation of the rural cooperative, or shares the contractual management right obtained by the "bidding Association" outside the household contract way to the company enterprise, thus obtaining the co operatives or companies to invest. The different views on the nature of the ownership of the contractual management right of the land, that is, the transfer of property right, the transfer of creditor's rights and the theory of the transfer of equity, expressed their views on the transfer of equity, and put forward a view on the cooperation of the ownership of the contractual management right of the family. On the basis of the value concept of fairness and efficiency of law, this paper analyzes the meaning and balance of the legal value of the ownership of the farmland contracted management right, and puts forward that if we want to build the legal system of the ownership of the land contract management right, the focus should be focused on the particularity of the relationship between the peasants and the land, and the fair value should be taken. System construction and improvement on the basis of efficiency value. The second chapter, the relevant legal provisions and basic principles of the ownership of the land contract management rights. First, from the laws, some rules, local regulations and national policies and so on, summed up the status of the relevant legal provisions of the ownership of the ownership. There are still many loopholes and shortcomings in the regulation of the ownership of the rights of the package management. We should strengthen the research on the difficult problems of the system and give the theoretical support to inherit and develop the ownership of the farmland contract management right. Secondly, because the contracted management right has been one of the accepted ways of the transfer of the land contract management right, the contract management is based on the agricultural land. The general principle of the transfer of right, sum up the principle concept that the system of the ownership of the land contract management right should be abided by. The third chapter, the difficult problem of the ownership of the land contract management right. This part is the key research object of this article, which is divided into the content of the land contract management right, the price of the land contracted management right and its cooperation. The status of the social property and the influence of the term of the contractual management right on its shareholding. First, the content of the ownership of the contractual management right of the land is in general circumstances, which should refer to the stock of the management right, and the peasants still retain the land contract right. However, there is still a view that under certain conditions, After the collective consent of the group, it can also not distinguish the contract right and the right of management, but shares the land contract management right as a whole. Secondly, when the land contract management right is priced in, it should be priced according to the different content of the shares and take different standard of pricing - for the management of the rights and ability, the land contract management should be referred to. The price of the right to rent is made; for the overall purchase of the right to contracted management, the price of the transfer of the land contract management right should be referred to. A series of problems, such as the distribution of interests, mortgage and bankruptcy liquidation after the contracted management of land into the cooperative, are considered as follows: first, the consideration of the social security function of the land, the land contract The benefit distribution of the right to operate the right of management can be allocated by the combination of "bottom income income" and "floating dividend". Second, under the circumstances of allowing the land management right to be mortgaged, the co-operatives can mortgage their land management rights based on the consent of the farmers; third, the land contract management right is from the society. In the view of security, it is not suitable for the analysis of the property rights structure to be incorporated into the liquidation of the cooperative bankruptcy property. The author agrees to give the farmers "equal repurchase right". The author expounds the influence and problems of the term of the contractual management right and the long term contractual management right on the ownership of the contracted management rights. How to deal with the stock price, the withdrawal of shares and the balance of interests provide a theoretical expectation for the development and construction of the stock right system of the land contractual management right in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 丁關(guān)良;蔣莉;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社有關(guān)法律問題研究——以浙江省為例[J];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

2 劉俊;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)性質(zhì)探討[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年02期

3 史衛(wèi)民;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)入股公司的法律規(guī)制[J];中州學(xué)刊;2012年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 閔珊;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)股權(quán)化研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2038576