本文選題：失地農民 + 社會保障�。� 參考：《華中科技大學》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著工業(yè)化和城市化的進程,必然會出現大量的失地農民,失地農民法定社會保障標準低,與其發(fā)展需求不相適應,尤其是失地農民作為一個特殊的弱勢群體,需要政府優(yōu)先關注和保障。地方政府有責任深入研究和探索當地失地農民所面臨的生計、就業(yè)、發(fā)展等保障問題,充分發(fā)揮政府的能動作用,提高行政效率,以責任政府的高度處理好地區(qū)經濟發(fā)展、征地補償與失地農民社保的關系,利用經濟和市場的手段為失地農民提供更好服務和較高社會保障。本文將廣州開發(fā)區(qū)作為研究對象,分析了其在社會保障方面走過的歷程、具體做法,總結了其在解決失地農民社會保障方面有獨特的經驗,闡述了其作為責任主體在失地農民社會保障方面發(fā)揮的積極作用。 本文研究了土地征收與地方政府職能的關系,明析了地方政府無論從經濟職能還是從社會職能的角度都有能力、義務和職責通過構建社會保障制度,為失地農民融入城市提供各種服務和社會保障。通過對失地農民社會保障制度的供需均衡分析,得出由于失地農民社會保障的需求與供給不均衡,需要通過改變失地農民社會保障的需求與供給。為此,地方政府可以促進保障制度的調整與創(chuàng)新,通過系列的誘致性變遷措施,將變遷的阻滯成本降低。政府要著力改善關系失地農民社會保障制度的變遷環(huán)境,促進變遷的發(fā)生。在市場經濟環(huán)境下,市場化程度不斷提高,將有利于借助市場的力量增強誘致性變遷的潛在利益效益,達到積極能動地創(chuàng)造條件誘導資源的有機結合,通過市場經濟的運行實現一系列誘致性制度變遷,為失地農民提供有效的社會保障制度供給。 土地的發(fā)展權承載著土地未來的最大收益潛力,在現行的征地制度下,非公共利益性質的征地行為侵害了失地農民的土地發(fā)展權,征地對于失地農民更多的是利益損失,用地單位和政府則享受了土地增值收益的大頭。土地征收后如何保證失地農民生存權的實現是首要解決的問題,如果不能夠解決和落實失地農民的生存權,則征地的正當性與合理性就會遭到質疑。從社會公平與正義的角度來看,失地農民為城市化做出了貢獻,理應享受城市化發(fā)展的成果,即應該享有土地發(fā)展權。現實中,農民常常被排除在土地發(fā)展權之外,具有非正當性。征地補償標準定得過低,土地增值收益主要集中在地方政府,地方政府通常將土地財政大部分用于城市建設開發(fā),投在農民社會保障和農村公共設施方面的少,失地農民的利益和保障得不到充分體現。從而導致城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展水平不平衡差距拉大,因此,地方政府公共投資政策要進行調整。 讓失地農民分享土地發(fā)展權,要同時強調保持區(qū)域經濟發(fā)展的活力,使地方政府更有能力扶持和帶動失地農民共同發(fā)展,解決好農民的社會保障、生活保障和農民市民化等系列問題,讓利益貢獻主體獲得社會發(fā)展成果的回報。因此,地方政府要更加積極地幫助農民享受土地發(fā)展權,通過區(qū)域經濟發(fā)展讓成果的受益者更具普遍性,唯此才能從根本上解決失地農民的社會保障和長遠生活保障。
[Abstract]:With the process of industrialization and urbanization, there will inevitably be a large number of landless peasants. The legal social security standards of the landless peasants are low and they are not compatible with their development needs. Especially, the landless peasants, as a special vulnerable group, need the government's priority attention and guarantee. The local government has the responsibility to study and explore the local landless peasants. We face the problems of livelihood, employment and development, give full play to the dynamic role of the government, improve the administrative efficiency, deal with the economic development of the region, the relationship between the compensation for land expropriation and the social security of the landless farmers by the responsibility of the government, and provide better services and higher social security for the landless farmers by means of economic and market means. This article will open Guangzhou. As the research object, the development area has analyzed the history of its social security and the specific experience in solving the social security of the landless peasants, and expounds the positive role it plays as the main body of responsibility in the social security of the landless peasants.
This paper studies the relationship between land expropriation and the function of local government. It is clear that the local government has the ability to provide all kinds of services and social security for the landless peasants to integrate into the city by building social security system in terms of economic and social functions, and through the supply and demand of the social security system for the landless peasants. The equilibrium analysis shows that the demand and supply of the social security of the landless peasants are not balanced, and the demand and supply of the social security of the landless peasants should be changed. Therefore, the local government can promote the adjustment and innovation of the guarantee system, and reduce the cost of the change by a series of induced change measures. The changing environment of the social security system of the peasants has promoted the change. In the environment of the market economy, the increasing degree of marketization will help to enhance the potential benefit and benefit of the induced changes by the power of the market, and achieve a positive and dynamic combination of the conditions of creating the conditions to induce the resources, and realize a series of market economy. Induced institutional changes provide an effective supply of social security system for landless peasants.
The right to development of land carries the greatest potential for the future of land. Under the current land expropriation system, the land expropriation behavior of non public interest has infringed the land development rights of the landless peasants. The land expropriation for the landless peasants is more of the benefit loss, the land units and the government enjoy the big head of the land value added income. How to protect the land after the land expropriation The realization of the peasants' right to survive is the first problem to be solved. If it is not able to solve and implement the right to survive the landless peasants, the legitimacy and rationality of the land expropriation will be questioned. From the perspective of social fairness and justice, the landless peasants have made contributions to the Urbanization, and should enjoy the achievements of the urbanization development, that is, it should be enjoyed. Land development right. In reality, farmers are often excluded from the right to land development, which is unjustifiable. The compensation standard for land expropriation is too low and the land value-added income is mainly concentrated in the local government. The local government usually applies most of the land finance to the urban construction and development, and the land is low in the social security of farmers and the rural public facilities. The interests and security of farmers are not fully reflected. Thus, the uneven gap between urban and rural development is widening. Therefore, the public investment policy of local governments should be adjusted.
Let the landless farmers share the right to land development, at the same time emphasize the vitality of regional economic development, make local governments more able to support and drive the common development of land lost farmers, solve the social security of farmers, life guarantee and the citizenization of the farmers and other problems, so that the interests of the main body of social development results will be rewarded. Therefore, the local government will be rewarded with the results of social development. The government should more actively help farmers to enjoy the right to land development. Through regional economic development, the beneficiaries of the results are more universal. Only in this way can we fundamentally solve the social security and long-term guarantee of land lost farmers.

【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D630;F323.89

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉雪雁;尹鋒;;淺議中國失地農民社會保障問題[J];安徽農業(yè)科學;2007年24期

2 郭曰君;呂鐵貞;;社會保障權憲法確認之比較研究[J];比較法研究;2007年01期

3 潘誠,張鴻雁;對失地農民社會保障問題的再思考[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術學院學報;2005年01期

4 韓俊;;賦予農民平等發(fā)展機會[J];財經界;2004年03期

5 王美涵,董文松;失地農民的社會保障問題研究——以龍港的社會保障為例[J];財經論叢(浙江財經學院學報);2004年05期

6 林民書,李文溥,林楓;郊區(qū)被動型城市化農民就業(yè)問題研究——廈門市禾山鎮(zhèn)農民非農化問題實證分析[J];財經研究;2002年09期

7 陶勇;二元經濟結構下的中國農民社會保障制度透視[J];財經研究;2002年11期

8 李輝;張璇;;農民收入保障性的長效運行框架研究[J];重慶文理學院學報(社會科學版);2009年06期

9 張春龍,聶玉梅;“農民”向“市民”的轉化——城市化過程中進城農村人口的再社會化[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設;2001年08期

10 繆青;朱宏亮;;東亞部分國家和地區(qū)土地征收法律制度比較[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設;2006年08期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉海云;城市化進程中失地農民問題研究[D];河北農業(yè)大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 任浩;征地制度中地價補償標準的研究[D];中國農業(yè)大學;2003年

2 梁偉;失地農民社會保障研究[D];河北大學;2004年

3 唐瓊;論失地農民權益的法律保障[D];華中師范大學;2006年

4 高翔;失地農民的社會保障問題研究[D];華中師范大學;2006年

5 王仍秀;中國失地農民問題研究[D];華僑大學;2006年

6 鐘永海;城市化進程中失地農民權益受損的原因分析及對策[D];江西師范大學;2006年

7 金小琴;征地中的失地農民權益保障研究[D];四川農業(yè)大學;2006年

8 武玲娟;城市化進程中“政府主導型”失地農民社會保障模式研究[D];山東大學;2006年

9 馬麗琴;城市化進程中的失地農民權益問題研究[D];南京農業(yè)大學;2006年

10 秦文華;城市化進程中失地農民權益受損與政策支持研究[D];湘潭大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1834976