本文選題：刑事訴訟　切入點：交叉詢問　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國2012年新修改的《刑事訴訟法》中初步引入控辯雙方交叉詢問的舉證質(zhì)證模式,由控辯雙方通過舉證質(zhì)證等一系列程序,推動庭審進行的證據(jù)調(diào)查方式,但在立法與司法實踐中此種證人詢問模式并未真正的發(fā)揮作用。對比研究英國、美國、德國日本及臺灣地區(qū)的幾種證人詢問模式,反映出我國交叉詢問制度在理念與文化層面中存在的問題。按照國際刑事法院程序正義的標準,交叉詢問是法治社會保障人權(quán)與價值的具體制度,同時也符合我國“以事實為依據(jù),以法律為準繩”的基本訴訟原則。刑事訴訟的目的在于懲戒犯罪實現(xiàn)國家刑罰權(quán),而實現(xiàn)刑罰權(quán)要以事實為依據(jù)以真實為基礎(chǔ)。如今世界上的大多數(shù)國家都在積極探索還原案件真實的方法,論文將在兩大法系的互相交融與我國司法改革的大背景之下,對于我國刑事訴訟交叉詢問制度的重構(gòu)展開初步探討,進而探索交叉詢問的理論價值、實質(zhì)價值、人權(quán)保障價值,從而達到發(fā)現(xiàn)案件真實、維護程序正義、實現(xiàn)實體正義的目的。對比我國傳統(tǒng)訴訟的歷史演變進程,分析當今證人詢問制度的原因,提出交叉詢問的程序規(guī)則和相應(yīng)配套性措施,包括陪審制度、辯護制度、法官制度、證人出庭作證制度以及審前準備程序等制度,以期真正發(fā)揮交叉詢問制度發(fā)現(xiàn)案件真實之功效。
[Abstract]:In our country's newly amended Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the mode of cross-examination of evidence between the prosecution and the defence was initially introduced, and a series of procedures, such as cross-examination of evidence, were adopted by the prosecution and the defence to promote the way of evidence investigation carried out in court.However, in the legislative and judicial practice, this mode of witness interrogation has not really played a role.A comparative study of several witness interrogation modes in Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and Taiwan reflects the problems in the concept and culture of the cross-examination system in China.According to the standard of procedural justice of the International Criminal Court, cross-inquiry is the concrete system of social security of human rights and value under the rule of law. At the same time, it is also in line with the basic procedural principle of "taking facts as the basis and the law as the yardstick" in our country.The purpose of the criminal procedure is to punish the crime to realize the state penalty right, and the realization of the penalty right should be based on the fact and the truth.Nowadays, most of the countries in the world are actively exploring ways to restore the truth of the case. The thesis will be in the background of the blending of the two legal systems and the judicial reform of our country.In order to find out the truth of the case and maintain the procedural justice, this paper discusses the reconstruction of the cross-examination system in criminal proceedings in China, and then explores the theoretical value, the substantive value and the human rights guarantee value of the cross-questioning system.To achieve the objective of substantive justice.This paper compares the historical evolution of traditional litigation in China, analyzes the reasons of the witness questioning system, and puts forward the procedural rules of cross-examination and corresponding supporting measures, including jury system, defense system, judge system, etc.The system of witness testifying in court and pretrial preparation procedure is expected to play the role of cross-examination system in discovering the truth of the case.
【學位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李鑫;;“審判中心”視角下我國證人“交叉詢問”制度構(gòu)建[J];法制博覽;2016年18期

2 劉國慶;;論美國刑事證據(jù)法中的異議制度及啟示[J];中國刑事法雜志;2013年01期

3 龍宗智;;我國刑事庭審中人證調(diào)查的幾個問題——以“交叉詢問”問題為中心[J];政法論壇;2008年05期

4 陳衛(wèi)東;王靜;;我國刑事庭審中交叉詢問規(guī)則之重構(gòu)[J];人民檢察;2007年22期

5 陳健民;美國刑事訴訟中交叉詢問的規(guī)則與技巧[J];法學;2004年04期

6 宋健強;對律師形象社會定位的探究[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2003年02期

7 胡波;也談我國的交叉詢問制度[J];法學雜志;2002年06期

8 張衛(wèi)平;;交叉詢問制:魅力與異境的尷尬[J];中外法學;2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 孟慶達;論我國刑事審判中交叉詢問制度的完善[D];遼寧大學;2016年

，

本文編號：1722970