本文選題：社會保障卡　切入點：犯罪　出處：《華東政法大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：行為人持他人社保卡、或利用“套現(xiàn)”等利益誘惑、或采取盜竊、搶奪等非法手段獲取他人社�？ê蠹右允褂茫址杆素敭a(chǎn)所有權(quán)及國家醫(yī)療保險管理秩序，該如何適用法律進行定罪處罰，引發(fā)的各種爭議較大。司法實踐中針對上述行為，有的依照獲取社�？ǖ淖靼甘侄畏謩e定罪處罰，即對盜竊、搶劫、搶奪等手段獲取社�？ú⑹褂玫�，分別認定為盜竊罪、搶劫罪、搶奪罪等。有的直接以詐騙罪定罪，因為不管如何取得社�？�，行為人最終獲取利益的手段，必須是要冒用他人社�？�，以騙取國家醫(yī)�；鸬男问絹硗瓿�。 本人在檢察機關(guān)公訴部門工作多年，接觸和辦理了一定數(shù)量的社�？ǚ缸锇讣�，對此有著強烈的認知，本文擬從司法實踐的角度及視野，嘗試分析利用社�？▽嵤┰p騙，以及盜竊他人社�？ú⑹褂玫男再|(zhì)等爭議較大的問題，并進一步展開思索和探究，提出解決相關(guān)問題的傾向性觀點。我認為無論占有他人社�？ㄟ^程是否合法，，只要在未發(fā)生實際就醫(yī)的情況下，使用上述社�？ㄖ玲t(yī)院、藥店等醫(yī)療機構(gòu)配取大量藥品，且相關(guān)藥品并非用于社�？ǹㄖ鞅救说�，都屬于詐騙國家醫(yī)�；鸬男袨�。但是在實踐中，將此類行為認定為保險詐騙是不妥當?shù)�，因為該兩類犯罪在保險屬性、保險所經(jīng)營的主體、目的、實施方式，包括保險費的的負擔形式等方面均存在很大不同，據(jù)此將此類犯罪行為以保險詐騙行為予以認定是不妥當?shù)�。筆者認為，通過借用等合法方式取得他人社保卡并使用的，符合詐騙犯罪的構(gòu)成要件。 但是，對于通過盜竊等犯罪手段獲取他人社�？ú⑹褂玫男袨�，在實踐中如何予以認定存在較大爭議，有觀點認為上述行為涉及吸收犯問題，有觀點認為應(yīng)以結(jié)合犯理論分析上述行為，有觀點認為上述行為同樣應(yīng)當認定為詐騙罪一罪，亦有觀點認為對于上述行為，應(yīng)當參照盜竊信用卡并使用的行為，以盜竊罪定罪處罰。筆者在下文中嘗試通過對幾種不同觀點的批駁，結(jié)合相關(guān)案例進行法理分析。筆者認為，對于上述行為，并不能簡單的參照盜竊信用卡并使用的相關(guān)規(guī)定，而作出盜竊罪的性質(zhì)認定。因為行為人最終實現(xiàn)其犯罪目的的行為，仍然屬于冒用他人身份，詐騙國家醫(yī)保基金的行為；且因其犯罪行為最終實際利益受損的，不僅僅包括持卡人本身社�？▋�(nèi)的余額，還包括了國家醫(yī)�；鸬闹Ц恫糠�。故對于此類行為，筆者認為更符合牽連犯的構(gòu)成要件，應(yīng)當以牽連犯的相關(guān)理論進行分析及認定。
[Abstract]:The perpetrator holds another person's social security card, or takes advantage of "cash" and other interests to seduce him or her, or takes illegal means such as theft, snatch and other illegal means to obtain another person's social security card and use it, thus infringing upon the property ownership of others and the order of the management of state medical insurance. How to apply the law to the conviction and punishment, which leads to a great deal of controversy. In judicial practice, according to the means of obtaining the social security card, some people are convicted and punished separately, that is, theft, robbery, If the social security card is obtained and used by means such as robbery, theft, robbery, robbery, and so on. Some are directly convicted of fraud, because no matter how the social security card is obtained, the means by which the perpetrator ultimately obtains the benefit, Must be to use other people's social security card, to deceive the form of national health insurance fund to complete. I have been working in the prosecution department of the procuratorial organ for many years, have come into contact with and handled a certain number of social security card crime cases, have strong cognition to this, this article intends to analyze and use social security card to carry out fraud from the angle of judicial practice and vision. And the nature of theft and use of other people's social security card and other controversial issues, and further thinking and exploring, put forward a tendentiousness point of view to solve the related problems. I think whether the process of possessing other people's social security card is legal or not, As long as medical institutions such as hospitals, pharmacies and other medical institutions use the above-mentioned social security card to obtain a large number of medicines without actual medical treatment, and the relevant drugs are not used by the holder of the social security card, Both belong to the act of defrauding the national health insurance fund. However, in practice, it is inappropriate to regard this kind of behavior as insurance fraud, because these two types of crimes are in the nature of insurance, the subject of insurance business, the purpose, and the way of implementation. There are great differences in the forms of burden of insurance premiums, so it is not appropriate to identify such criminal acts as insurance fraud. The author believes that it is not appropriate to obtain other people's social security cards and use them through legal means such as borrowing, etc. Conformed to the constitutive requirements of the crime of fraud. However, for the behavior of obtaining and using other people's social security card through criminal means such as theft, how to identify it in practice is controversial. There are views that the above-mentioned acts should be analyzed by combining the crime theory, that the above-mentioned acts should also be regarded as the crime of fraud, and that for the above-mentioned acts, reference should be made to the acts of stealing credit cards and using them, In the following part, I try to refute several different viewpoints and make legal analysis in combination with relevant cases. The author believes that the above behavior can not simply refer to the relevant provisions of credit card theft and use. And to determine the nature of the crime of larceny. Because the act of the perpetrator finally achieving his criminal purpose still belongs to the act of defrauding the national health insurance fund by using another person's identity, and because of his criminal act, the ultimate actual interests are damaged, It includes not only the balance in the card holder's own social security card, but also the payment part of the national health insurance fund. Therefore, the author thinks that this kind of behavior is more in line with the constitutive requirements of implicated crime, which should be analyzed and confirmed by the relevant theory of implicated crime.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 王琬;;可持續(xù)發(fā)展視角下的醫(yī)療保險制度優(yōu)化[J];湖北社會科學;2010年05期

2 曹小航;張芳;;上海檢察機關(guān)建議加強醫(yī)�；鸨O(jiān)管 200張醫(yī)�？ㄗ兂稍p騙工具[J];檢察風云;2011年02期

3 劉憲權(quán);信用卡詐騙罪的司法認定[J];政法論壇;2003年03期

4 梁華仁,郭亞;信用卡詐騙罪若干問題研究[J];政法論壇;2004年01期

5 趙螓蛉;;上海醫(yī)�；鹪p騙案分析及思考[J];中國社會保障;2011年11期

本文編號：1667804