本文選題：民營(yíng)企業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：財(cái)務(wù)信用　出處：《上海工程技術(shù)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：美國(guó)著名的金融投資公司雷曼兄弟在2008年宣布破產(chǎn),既有忽視利益相關(guān)者的利益的原因,也因內(nèi)部忽視經(jīng)營(yíng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)而致。國(guó)內(nèi)社會(huì)責(zé)任缺失現(xiàn)象也較為嚴(yán)重,典型的表現(xiàn)有以下幾種:有毒膠囊、雙匯瘦肉精以及食品塑化劑事件等不斷引起消費(fèi)恐慌;中小股東利益受到侵占事件、員工不能被按時(shí)足額繳納社保等問題時(shí)有發(fā)生;北京等北方城市霧霾天氣持續(xù)惡化及上海金山區(qū)水污染事件也敲響了社會(huì)對(duì)于環(huán)境問題關(guān)注不足的警鐘。這些現(xiàn)象催促著社會(huì)各界特別是企業(yè)對(duì)社會(huì)責(zé)任各方面問題的重視。截至2011年底,我國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)總數(shù)占全國(guó)企業(yè)總數(shù)的96%,對(duì)GDP貢獻(xiàn)已經(jīng)超過50%。另一方面,縱觀2013年中國(guó)企業(yè)500強(qiáng)榜單,民營(yíng)企業(yè)雖然只有區(qū)區(qū)16家,但是卻用僅占不到社會(huì)資源總量1/3的比重創(chuàng)造了我國(guó)GDP2/3的增長(zhǎng)。這些都足以說明民營(yíng)企業(yè)已經(jīng)在我國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中逐漸占據(jù)了重要地位。另一方面,由于我國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)尚且處于發(fā)展較不完善的階段,各項(xiàng)體系都不夠健全,社會(huì)相應(yīng)的配套制度也不夠成熟,使得民營(yíng)企業(yè)當(dāng)前發(fā)展中財(cái)務(wù)信用很多問題都成為社會(huì)關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。與此同時(shí),在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)大環(huán)境中,財(cái)務(wù)信用是交易雙方權(quán)益的基本保障和權(quán)力,較發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家已建立完善的法規(guī)和信用制度而言,我國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)由于更多關(guān)注利潤(rùn)最大化和履行社會(huì)責(zé)任可能付出的代價(jià),財(cái)務(wù)信用缺失現(xiàn)象非常明顯。企業(yè)不同的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)情況和企業(yè)文化、價(jià)值觀的不同會(huì)使不同企業(yè)對(duì)社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效的認(rèn)識(shí)程度不同,而財(cái)務(wù)信用狀況能夠從另一個(gè)側(cè)面反映民營(yíng)企業(yè)整體履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的意識(shí)和行為能力,因此將二者結(jié)合研究具有很強(qiáng)的實(shí)際意義和創(chuàng)新性�，F(xiàn)階段,我國(guó)關(guān)于社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效的研究和實(shí)踐都尚且處于初級(jí)階段,鑒于民營(yíng)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任問題的不良現(xiàn)狀和研究的迫切性,本文將重點(diǎn)關(guān)注當(dāng)前最熱門的話題之一——社會(huì)責(zé)任問題,并創(chuàng)新性的從財(cái)務(wù)信用的視角研究社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效問題。本文以近三年中國(guó)上市民營(yíng)企業(yè)100強(qiáng)中的37家上市公司為研究對(duì)象,所使用的財(cái)務(wù)信用相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)源自相關(guān)網(wǎng)站披露的年度財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表和財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告,社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效指數(shù)源自社科院發(fā)布的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任藍(lán)皮書《中國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任研究報(bào)告》,在國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)于財(cái)務(wù)信用和社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效研究的基礎(chǔ)上,通過理論研究、闡述和實(shí)證分析,設(shè)計(jì)一系列反映企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)信用的財(cái)務(wù)和非財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo),分財(cái)務(wù)部分和非財(cái)務(wù)部分分別進(jìn)行研究與分析,先進(jìn)行描述性統(tǒng)計(jì),再通過相關(guān)分析和回歸分析,得出民營(yíng)企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)信用對(duì)社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效的正效應(yīng)結(jié)論。最后,分析產(chǎn)生這種情況的可能原因,針對(duì)性和創(chuàng)新性的提出對(duì)于民營(yíng)企業(yè)改善社會(huì)責(zé)任現(xiàn)狀的建議和對(duì)策及改善財(cái)務(wù)信用水平對(duì)于社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效的意義和作用。
[Abstract]:Lehman Brothers, a famous financial investment company in the United States, declared bankruptcy on 2008, which not only ignored the interests of stakeholders, but also caused by internal neglect of business risks. The phenomenon of lack of domestic social responsibility was also serious. The typical manifestations are as follows: toxic capsules, Shuanghui lean meatine and food plasticizer events cause consumer panic, small and medium-sized shareholders' interests are encroached upon, employees can not be paid social security on time and in full, and other problems occur from time to time; The continuous deterioration of haze weather in northern cities such as Beijing and the water pollution incident in Jinshan District of Shanghai have also sounded the alarm that the society is not paying enough attention to environmental problems. These phenomena urge all walks of life, especially enterprises, to be socially responsible. As of end of 2011, The total number of private enterprises in China accounts for 96% of the total number of enterprises in the country and has contributed more than 50% to GDP. On the other hand, looking at the 2013 list of China's top 500 enterprises, although there are only 16 private enterprises, However, it has created the growth of China's GDP2/3 with a proportion of less than 1/3 of the total amount of social resources. All this shows that private enterprises have gradually occupied an important position in our national economy. On the other hand, Because the private enterprises of our country are still in the stage of imperfect development, each system is not perfect enough, and the corresponding supporting system of society is not mature enough. At the same time, in the market economy environment, financial credit is the basic guarantee and power of both sides of the transaction. More developed countries have established perfect regulations and credit systems, the private enterprises in China may pay more attention to the maximization of profits and social responsibility. The phenomenon of lack of financial credit is very obvious. Different production and management situation, different enterprise culture and different values will make different enterprises have different understanding of social responsibility performance. But the financial credit condition can reflect the consciousness and behavior ability of the private enterprise to fulfill the social responsibility from the other side, so it is of great practical significance and innovation to combine the two aspects. The research and practice on the performance of social responsibility in China are still in the initial stage. In view of the bad situation and urgency of the research on the social responsibility of private enterprises, this paper will focus on one of the hottest topics at present-social responsibility. This paper takes 37 listed companies of China's top 100 listed private enterprises as the research objects, and studies the social responsibility performance from the perspective of financial credit. The financial credit-related data used are derived from the annual financial statements and financial reports disclosed on the relevant websites, The social responsibility performance index is derived from the Blue Book on Corporate Social responsibility published by the Academy of Social Sciences, "the Research report on Corporate Social responsibility in China". On the basis of the research on financial credit and social responsibility performance by domestic and foreign scholars, it is theoretically studied. In this paper, a series of financial and non-financial indexes reflecting the financial credit of an enterprise are designed, which are studied and analyzed separately in the financial and non-financial parts. First, descriptive statistics are carried out, and then, through correlation analysis and regression analysis, a series of financial and non-financial indicators are designed. The positive effect of financial credit on social responsibility performance of private enterprises is obtained. Finally, the possible reasons for this situation are analyzed. This paper puts forward some suggestions and countermeasures for private enterprises to improve the current situation of social responsibility and the significance and function of improving financial credit level for social responsibility performance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海工程技術(shù)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F275;F276.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 章輝美;李紹元;;中國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的理論與實(shí)踐[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

2 ;吳敬璉 破除體制障礙 加快改革進(jìn)程[J];小康;2010年01期

3 陳新桂;;財(cái)務(wù)困境上市公司治理失敗的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2007年04期

4 楊亞娥;劉建紅;;我國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露現(xiàn)狀分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2007年02期

5 雷漢云;宋世芪;;企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)失信行為的成因及其治理[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年29期

6 宋麗娟;;基于利益相關(guān)者理論的上市公司財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)——以醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)為例[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年33期

7 尹開國(guó);楊潔;高強(qiáng);;國(guó)外公司社會(huì)績(jī)效與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效相關(guān)性實(shí)證研究總結(jié)[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2010年18期

8 周康;;中國(guó)社會(huì)責(zé)任投資的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及策略[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年11期

9 溫素彬;方苑;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——利益相關(guān)者視角的面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年10期

10 沈占波;杜鵬;;我國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2009年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 辛杰;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 蔣榮狀;中小上市公司社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的關(guān)系研究[D];江南大學(xué);2012年

2 趙麟;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];蘭州理工大學(xué);2008年

3 聶嘉;我國(guó)上市公司企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1624589