本文選題：邊界 + 跨境民族��； 參考：《地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展》2017年09期

【摘要】：邊界是分割不同政治實(shí)體的界線,但國家對于邊界的管治往往是有彈性的,因而孕育了豐富的"流動(dòng)",成為經(jīng)濟(jì)融合、社會(huì)交流與文化對話的重要場域�？缇趁褡迨鞘芷溆绊懙牡湫腿后w,他們在原本生活區(qū)域被分隔的情況下,從未間斷過跨境流動(dòng)�？傮w來看,跨境流動(dòng)過程中的文化認(rèn)同及其形成機(jī)制是多元復(fù)雜的。本文以云南省河口縣中越邊境地區(qū)的苗族花山節(jié)為研究切入點(diǎn),通過質(zhì)性研究方法探討節(jié)慶所折射的民族文化認(rèn)同與國家認(rèn)同的建構(gòu)過程。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):跨界的流動(dòng)性加強(qiáng)了民族文化的交流與認(rèn)同,共同促成了花山節(jié)的文化傳承,維系了跨境民族的親緣關(guān)系。這樣的跨界流動(dòng)亦強(qiáng)化了邊界所形成的發(fā)展軌跡差異的感知,從而增強(qiáng)了中國籍苗族邊民的國家認(rèn)同與國家自豪感。
[Abstract]:Boundary is the dividing line between different political entities, but the state is often flexible in the governance of the border, thus giving birth to a rich "flow", becoming an important field of economic integration, social exchange and cultural dialogue. The cross-border ethnic group is a typical group affected by it, and they have never been interrupted when their original living areas were separated. In general, the cultural identity and its formation mechanism in the process of cross-border flow are complex. This paper takes the Miao Ethnic Festival in the Sino Vietnamese border areas in Yunnan Province as the research entry point, and probes into the construction process of national cultural identity and national identity reflected by the festival through qualitative research. The mobility strengthened the communication and identification of ethnic culture, jointly contributed to the cultural heritage of the Huashan Festival, and maintained the kinship of the cross-border ethnic groups. This transboundary flow also strengthened the perception of the differences in the development trajectory formed by the border, thus enhancing the national identity and national pride of the Chinese Miao people's border people.

【作者單位】： 西南林業(yè)大學(xué)園林學(xué)院;香港大學(xué)地理學(xué)系;華南師范大學(xué)地理科學(xué)學(xué)院文化地理與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)研究中心;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(41261031,51668057) 云南省高校重點(diǎn)建設(shè)學(xué)科風(fēng)景園林學(xué)建設(shè)項(xiàng)目~~
【分類號】：G03;K901.6
，

本文編號：1833263