發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-04 02:50

  本文選題：《鄭和航海圖》　切入點(diǎn)：《武備志》　出處：《中國(guó)歷史地理論叢》2007年02期

【摘要】：過(guò)去學(xué)界長(zhǎng)期使用的《鄭和航海圖》是向達(dá)先生根據(jù)《武備志》所錄圖的整理本,其實(shí)這個(gè)版本并非出自明天啟年間的《武備志》原刻本,而是出自清初的刪改本,《故宮珍本叢刊》中所收錄的《武備志》才是明原刻本。過(guò)去學(xué)界只知《武備志》中有此圖,其實(shí)成書(shū)于明末的《南樞志》中也錄有此圖。本文比較了上述三書(shū)中所錄的《鄭和航海圖》,發(fā)現(xiàn)三者互有對(duì)錯(cuò),因而不能在使用中簡(jiǎn)單地去一存一,將三圖結(jié)合考其訛誤,辨?zhèn)未嬲?作出新本將是解決這一問(wèn)題的根本方向。
[Abstract]:In the past, the chronically used navigational chart of Zheng he was a collation of the charts recorded by Mr. Xiang Da according to the Book of military Preparedness. In fact, this version did not come from the original edition of the Book of military Preparedness, which will be published in the beginning of the year tomorrow.But the abridged edition from the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, "The Imperial Palace rare book series" included in the "Wu Bei Zhi" is the original Ming Dynasty.In the past, scholars only knew this picture in Wu Bei Zhi, but it was recorded in Nanshu Zhi in late Ming Dynasty.This paper compares the navigational charts of Zheng he recorded in the above three books, and finds that the three are right and wrong, so they cannot simply save one at a time in use, combine the three charts with their errors, and distinguish the false from the true.A new version will be the fundamental way to solve the problem.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)歷史地理研究中心
【分類號(hào)】：K992.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 周運(yùn)中;;論《武備志》和《南樞志》中的《鄭和航海圖》[J];中國(guó)歷史地理論叢;2007年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1708043