本文選題：基層治理法治化　切入點：民族地區(qū)　出處：《廣西師范大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：為順應改革開放,深化改革,2014年10月在北京召開的黨的十八大四中全會上提出了“推進基層治理法治化”的要求,即“全面推進依法治國,基礎在基層,工作重點在基層”。俗話說,基礎不牢,地動山搖,重視基層治理法治化建設,構建完備的基層法治體系,才能確�；鶎由鐣�(wěn)定、人民安居樂業(yè)。文章第一部分主要介紹基層治理法治化與民族地區(qū)法治村屯概述。先介紹了什么是基層治理法治化,從而引出基層治理法治化的三特征是堅持黨的領導、建設法治政府、弘揚法治文化。然后介紹民族地區(qū)法治村屯的概念,從民族地區(qū)法治村屯的概念可以得知民族地區(qū)法治村屯具有法治化、民主化、制度化的特征。文章第二部分介紹了基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設的原則與內容。建設民族地區(qū)法治村屯要堅持維護國家統(tǒng)一、反對民族分裂的原則,落實民族區(qū)域自治的原則,促進民族共同發(fā)展的原則,保障雜居、散居少數民族權利的原則。從推進基層民主建設、社會管理綜合治理創(chuàng)新、發(fā)揮村規(guī)民約效力、提高法律意識等四個方面闡述民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設的內容。文章第三部分指出當前基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設取得的成就與存在的問題。從基層民主政治得到落實,村民自治效果顯著;社會管理綜合治理能力得到提高,糾紛得到有效化解;村規(guī)民約有效的維持了村屯秩序,有效的補充了國家法的不足;法律意識得到進一步提高論述基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設取得的成就。再從基層民主還不夠健全,村委會與鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府、村黨支部還不夠協(xié)調;社會管理綜合治理能力得到提高,糾紛解決方式有待完善;村規(guī)民約還不夠完善,村規(guī)民約與國家法還不夠相互融合;法律意識有待提高闡述民族地區(qū)法治建設所存在的問題。文章第四部分主要分析了基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設存在問題的原因分析。民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設存在問題的原因主要包括:自治功能還未充分落實,村民自治制度還存在缺陷;社會治理能力低,矛盾沒有得到及時化解;村約制定主體意識不夠,國家法對村約存在空白;村民法治文化培育不足。文章最后一部分則指出了基層治理法治化視野下構建民族地區(qū)法治村屯的新舉措。從完善村民自治法律法規(guī)、規(guī)范村委會與鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府以及村委會與村黨支部的關系,權責要更加明確論述落實村民自治,實現自我管理。從轉變政府職能,方便民眾訴訟、做到公正司法,完善訴訟外糾紛解決方式闡釋推進社會綜合治理,完善糾紛解決方式。接著從規(guī)范村規(guī)民約,國家法與民間法的融合說明規(guī)范村規(guī)民約,促進國家法與民間法的融合。最后從加大對教育的投入、提高法治宣傳質量論述完善加強法治宣傳,提高村民法律意識,從而構建民族地區(qū)法治村屯。
[Abstract]:In order to comply with the reform and opening up and deepen the reform, the fourth Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee held in Beijing on October 2014 put forward the requirement of "promoting the rule of law by law at the grass-roots level", that is, "comprehensively promoting the rule of law in accordance with the law, and the foundation lies at the grass-roots level." As the saying goes, "as the saying goes, only when the foundation is not strong, the ground is shaken, and the construction of grass-roots governance by law is attached importance to, and a complete grass-roots rule of law system can be built to ensure social stability at the grass-roots level. People live and work in peace and contentment. The first part of the article mainly introduces the rule of law at the grass-roots level and the village by law in minority areas. First, it introduces what is the rule of law by law at the grass-roots level, which leads to the three characteristics of the rule of law at the grass-roots level, which is to adhere to the leadership of the Party. Then introduce the concept of the village ruled by law in the minority areas. From the concept of the village ruled by law in the minority areas, we can know that the village ruled by law in the minority areas has the rule of law and democratization. The second part of the article introduces the principles and contents of the rule of law village construction in ethnic areas under the view of grass-roots governance and rule of law. In order to build the village under the rule of law in ethnic minority areas, we should uphold the principle of safeguarding national unity and opposing national division. To implement the principle of regional autonomy for ethnic groups, to promote the common development of ethnic groups, and to safeguard the rights of ethnic minorities living in mixed and scattered areas. The third part of the article points out the achievements and existing problems in the construction of the village ruled by law in ethnic minority areas under the view of the rule of law at the grass-roots level. Grassroots democracy has been implemented, The effect of villager autonomy is remarkable; the comprehensive management ability of the society is improved and the disputes are effectively resolved; the village rules and regulations effectively maintain the order of the village and effectively supplement the deficiencies of the national law; The legal consciousness has been further improved and discussed the achievements in the construction of the village ruled by law in ethnic minority areas under the view of the rule of law at the grass-roots level, and then the democracy at the grass-roots level is not perfect, the village committee is not in harmony with the township government, and the village party branch is not in harmony; The comprehensive management ability of social management has been improved, the dispute resolution method needs to be improved, the village rules and regulations are not perfect, the village rules and the state law are not enough to merge each other. Legal consciousness needs to be improved and the problems existing in the construction of the rule of law in ethnic minority areas are expounded. Part 4th mainly analyzes the causes of the problems existing in the construction of villages ruled by law in ethnic minority areas from the perspective of the rule of law at the grass-roots level. The main reasons for the problems in the construction of villages ruled by law include: the function of autonomy has not been fully implemented. The villager autonomy system still has the flaw; the social governance ability is low, the contradiction has not been resolved in time, the village covenant formulation main body consciousness is not enough, the state law has the blank to the village contract; The last part of the article points out the new measures to construct the village ruled by law in ethnic minority areas under the view of the rule of law at the grass-roots level, from the perspective of perfecting the laws and regulations of villager autonomy, In order to standardize the relationship between the village committee and the township government, and between the village committee and the village party branch, the power and responsibility should be more clearly expounded on the implementation of villager autonomy and the realization of self-management. Perfect the settlement of disputes outside litigation, explain and promote the comprehensive management of society, perfect the settlement of disputes. Then, from standardizing village rules and regulations, the fusion of state law and folk law explains how to regulate village rules and regulations. Finally, from increasing the investment in education, improving the quality of publicity on the rule of law, strengthening the publicity of the rule of law, enhancing the legal awareness of the villagers, so as to build a village ruled by law in ethnic areas.
【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D920.0

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 程又中;張勇;;城鄉(xiāng)基層治理:使之走出困境的政府責任[J];社會主義研究;2009年04期

2 鄭風田;;新時期基層治理什么模式最合適[J];人民論壇;2010年01期

3 中共成都市委黨校課題組;李仁彬;;關于協(xié)商民主與基層治理的研究報告——以成都農村新型基層治理機制為例[J];中共成都市委黨校學報;2012年06期

4 貢太雷;張秀玉;;論社會基層治理的民主化與法治化[J];內蒙古民族大學學報(社會科學版);2013年03期

5 李金兆;徐霽;董亮;簡青;;基層公開促進基層治理的成都實踐[J];中共成都市委黨校學報;2013年03期

6 舒紹福;;基層治理生態(tài)的失衡與調適——以“黑磚窯事件”為例[J];理論與改革;2007年06期

7 袁緒程;;加快基層治理的綜合配套改革[J];中國改革;2009年12期

8 ;謹防基礎“懸浮”[J];人民論壇;2010年01期

9 賀雪峰;劉岳;;基層治理中的“不出事邏輯”[J];學術研究;2010年06期

10 劉麗;唐紹洪;;論協(xié)商民主在基層治理中的價值[J];人民論壇;2010年17期

相關會議論文 前3條

1 周斌;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌背景下的基層治理機制建設研究——基于對成都市新都區(qū)基層治理建設的個案分析[A];“中國特色社會主義行政管理體制”研討會暨中國行政管理學會第20屆年會論文集[C];2010年

2 陳輝;;新中國成立60年來城市基層治理的結構與變遷[A];變遷中的中國城市治理[C];2013年

3 羅明;;“日常生活”人本化與民主化的漸進——成都市構建城鄉(xiāng)新型治理機制與提高村級公共服務的深遠意義[A];全國社科院系統(tǒng)中國特色社會主義理論體系研究中心第十六屆年會暨理論研討會論文集——黨的領導與中國特色社會主義（上）[C];2009年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 馮興元;地方基層治理中的“委托——代理”[N];第一財經日報;2007年

2 記者 趙秉瑜 吳麗霞;中國農村婦女參與基層治理研討會在延召開[N];延安日報;2009年

3 周人杰;基層治理最愁“鈍刀子割肉”[N];人民日報;2014年

4 朱昌俊 四川 媒體人;“村霸”之死折射基層治理灰色化[N];長江日報;2014年

5 佛山日報通訊評論員 市社工委社會與社區(qū)建設指導科副科長 李清平;重構基層治理，凝聚社區(qū)認同[N];佛山日報;2014年

6 首席記者 秦德勝;以治水推進經濟轉型和基層治理[N];紹興日報;2014年

7 劉東豪 中共佛山市禪城區(qū)委書記;提高公共服務水平 構建基層治理新格局[N];佛山日報;2014年

8 金秀;對上起訴一小步 基層治理一大步[N];中國縣域經濟報;2014年

9 一溪;治理“群租”考驗基層治理智慧[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報;2014年

10 何紹輝 湖南省社科院國家治理與公共政策研究中心副主任;基層治理要瞄準需求靶心[N];人民日報;2014年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 楊艷文;社會組織與城市社會基層治理轉型研究[D];上海大學;2015年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 冼銀崧;基層治理視角下的黃埔區(qū)“三化”服務管理創(chuàng)新研究[D];華南理工大學;2015年

2 何泳龍;“兩說一聯(lián)”：以法治補充自治的地方實踐[D];華中師范大學;2015年

3 朱洪榮;基層治理與縣鄉(xiāng)財政體制創(chuàng)新[D];云南財經大學;2015年

4 楊蓉榮;協(xié)商民主導向的城市基層治理研究[D];中共江蘇省委黨校;2015年

5 竇方;被擱置的改革：從周口平墳事件看網絡公共領域對鄉(xiāng)村基層治理的影響機制[D];復旦大學;2014年

6 毛光霞;秦漢轉型時期鄉(xiāng)紳治理的功能研究[D];東華大學;2016年

7 曹玲玉;基層治理視域下的烏魯木齊市社區(qū)網格化管理研究[D];新疆大學;2015年

8 吳滿;情理之間：公共事務中的動員式治理[D];華東師范大學;2016年

9 仲國威;街道辦事處的變遷：城市基層治理的演變、矛盾及對策[D];蘇州大學;2016年

10 盧征;街道辦事處的權能配置研究[D];山東大學;2016年

，

本文編號：1611997