【摘要】：自20世紀中期以來，市場經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展，人性的肆意剝削和掠奪，造成尖銳的人與自然的矛盾，人與自然能否實現(xiàn)和諧統(tǒng)一是擺在人類面前的難題。當代人的時代困境及生態(tài)轉向促使國內外學者加深了對馬克思和恩格斯生態(tài)思想的研究。然而地球是全人類共有的，生態(tài)危機不分國界，生態(tài)環(huán)境問題產生的影響是全球性的。解決生態(tài)危機，任何一個國家都不能完成，需要全世界和全人類的共同合作。為了探討共同關心的生態(tài)危機問題，加深對馬克思、恩格斯生態(tài)思想的理解，促進環(huán)境與社會、經(jīng)濟、文化、資源利用等問題的研究，建立全面、協(xié)調、可持續(xù)的發(fā)展觀，促進中國與國際學術界的交流，近年來，，我國學者積極參與甚至舉辦相關的國際學術會議。 通過學術交流，國內外學者達成許多共識，也存在不少分歧。這為我們加深對馬恩生態(tài)思想的理解和運用，促進東西方文化的融合和互補，為加強中外學者在解決生態(tài)危機以及環(huán)境哲學研究等方面的交流與合作，起到了良好的推動作用。 本文主要闡述了以下幾個內容： 首先闡述了馬克思、恩格斯生態(tài)思想的主要內容。以自然觀和實踐觀作為理論基礎，通過勞動進行關聯(lián)，實現(xiàn)對資本主義制度批判和建構共產主義社會的理想目標，由此構建一個完整的生態(tài)思想邏輯架構。 其次簡要闡述了近年來以“馬克思主義與生態(tài)文明”為主題的國際會議，和閃現(xiàn)馬克思主義生態(tài)思想的國際會議，為接下來的交流奠定基礎。 然后闡述了交流的重點與方向。從生態(tài)學馬克思主義的理論研究，生態(tài)文明的實現(xiàn)機制，生態(tài)文明的文化訴求，馬克思主義與建設性后現(xiàn)代主義的生態(tài)理念的關聯(lián)四個方面分別進行了詳細論述。 接下來，對交流的共識與分歧進行了根源探究。主要有兩方面共識：馬克思、恩格斯生態(tài)思想為探討生態(tài)問題提供了方法論基礎和生態(tài)危機的出路——構建生態(tài)文明。主要存在三方面分歧：對馬克思、恩格斯生態(tài)思想研究側重點的分歧，生態(tài)文明實現(xiàn)路徑的分歧，馬克思主義與建設性后現(xiàn)代主義理念關聯(lián)點的分歧。 最后闡述了文化交流對發(fā)展馬克思主義的意義以及個人的一點思考。
[Abstract]:Since the middle of the 20th century, the rapid development of the market economy and the wanton exploitation and plunder of human nature have caused sharp contradictions between man and nature, and whether man and nature can realize harmony and unity is a difficult problem in front of mankind. The predicament and ecological turn of contemporary people prompted scholars at home and abroad to deepen the study of Marx's and Engels' ecological thought. However, the earth is common to all mankind, ecological crisis does not recognize national boundaries, the impact of ecological problems is global. The solution to the ecological crisis cannot be completed by any country. It requires the cooperation of the whole world and all mankind. In order to explore the ecological crisis of common concern, deepen the understanding of Marx and Engels' ecological thought, promote the study of environment and society, economy, culture and resource utilization, and establish a comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable concept of development, In recent years, Chinese scholars actively participate in and even hold relevant international academic conferences. Through academic exchanges, scholars at home and abroad have reached a lot of consensus, but also many differences. This has played a good role in promoting the understanding and application of Man's ecological thought, promoting the integration and complementarity of eastern and western cultures, and strengthening the exchange and cooperation between Chinese and foreign scholars in solving the ecological crisis and the study of environmental philosophy. This article mainly elaborated the following several contents: first elaborated Marx, Engels ecological thought main content. Taking the view of nature and practice as the theoretical basis, this paper attempts to realize the ideal goal of criticizing the capitalist system and constructing a communist society through labor, thus constructing a complete logical structure of ecological ideology. Secondly, it briefly expounds the international conferences on the theme of "Marxism and ecological civilization" in recent years, and the international conference on the development of Marxist ecological thought, which lays a foundation for the following exchanges. Then elaborated the focal point and the direction of the exchange. This paper discusses in detail the theoretical research of ecological Marxism, the realization mechanism of ecological civilization, the cultural appeal of ecological civilization and the relationship between Marxism and the ecological concept of constructive postmodernism. Next, it explores the root causes of the consensus and differences in communication. There are mainly two aspects of consensus: Marx and Engels' ecological thought provides the methodology foundation and the outlet of ecological crisis for the discussion of ecological problems, that is, constructing ecological civilization. There are three main differences: the focus of the study of Marx and Engels' ecological thoughts, the differences of the path of ecological civilization realization, and the differences between Marxism and constructive postmodernism. Finally, it expounds the significance of cultural exchange to the development of Marxism and personal thinking.
【學位授予單位】：西北農林科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：A811

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 郭劍仁;馬克思的物質變換概念及其當代意義[J];武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年02期

2 郇慶治;;國內生態(tài)社會主義研究論評[J];江漢論壇;2006年04期

本文編號：2402712