【摘要】：強(qiáng)調(diào)中國(guó)的《資本論》研究的方法論自覺,其重要一維是對(duì)國(guó)際學(xué)界的《資本論》研究進(jìn)行分析和研判。在當(dāng)代國(guó)外左派學(xué)界,奈格里、克里弗等學(xué)者始終致力于從政治角度來(lái)解讀《資本論》的內(nèi)涵,并視之為在當(dāng)下語(yǔ)境中重讀《資本論》的必要前提。盡管他們的觀點(diǎn)不盡相同,但都會(huì)選擇貨幣、商品等某種要素來(lái)凸顯對(duì)抗性社會(huì)關(guān)系及階級(jí)斗爭(zhēng)的內(nèi)涵。由于他們未能把握住馬克思階級(jí)斗爭(zhēng)理論的唯物史觀基礎(chǔ),因此,他們往往會(huì)因?yàn)檫^(guò)于強(qiáng)調(diào)單純的政治式解讀線索而忽略了《資本論》中關(guān)于生產(chǎn)方式內(nèi)在矛盾運(yùn)動(dòng)規(guī)律的重要性。比岱的解讀思路盡管在對(duì)《資本論》的政治式解讀中顯得具有較強(qiáng)的學(xué)理性,但過(guò)度強(qiáng)調(diào)政治斗爭(zhēng)線索的重要性也使他看不到馬克思?xì)v史辯證法思想的深層內(nèi)涵。
[Abstract]:It emphasizes the methodological consciousness of the study of Capital in China, and its important one dimension is to analyze and judge the study of Capital in international academic circles. In the contemporary foreign left-wing academic circles, Negri, Clive and other scholars have always devoted themselves to interpreting the connotation of Capital from a political perspective, and regarded it as a necessary prerequisite for rereading Capital in the present context. Although their views are different, they all choose some elements, such as currency and commodities, to highlight the connotation of antagonistic social relations and class struggle. Because they failed to grasp the historical materialism foundation of Marx's theory of class struggle, They tend to neglect the importance of the law of internal contradiction in production mode in Capital because of their too much emphasis on the simple political interpretation of clues. Although Beidai's thinking of reading Capital in a political way has a strong sense of learning, but too much emphasis on the importance of political struggle leads him not to see the deep connotation of Marx's dialectical thought of history.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目“基于文本闡釋的馬克思主義哲學(xué)通史研究”(16JJD710007)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：A123;F0-0
，

本文編號(hào)：2338790