本文選題：剝削與反剝削 + 必然性與合理性��； 參考：《中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：私有制的產(chǎn)生與存在,所帶來(lái)的一個(gè)必然現(xiàn)象是階級(jí)壓迫與階級(jí)剝削,雖然不是任何私有制都必然導(dǎo)致剝削的產(chǎn)生,但可以確認(rèn)的是,剝削的產(chǎn)生是與私有制的存在相聯(lián)系的。對(duì)私有制與剝削的評(píng)價(jià),自然是不同的階級(jí)由于各自所處的社會(huì)地位不同,其評(píng)價(jià)也是不同的。一般說(shuō)來(lái),剝削階級(jí)通常對(duì)剝削訴諸的是肯定與辯護(hù),被剝削階級(jí)訴諸的是否定與批判。馬克思的歷史觀是如何看待剝削的?在許多人的思維認(rèn)識(shí)中,似乎馬克思的歷史觀對(duì)私有制與剝削現(xiàn)象無(wú)疑是采取否定與批判態(tài)度的,有人甚至將馬克思主義視作是一種對(duì)私有制批判的理論,這是一種嚴(yán)重的誤讀。在馬克思?xì)v史觀的視野里,私有制與剝削的產(chǎn)生,雖然給被剝削階級(jí)帶來(lái)災(zāi)難,但它卻是人類(lèi)文明的一個(gè)必經(jīng)階段,不是所有的剝削都是正當(dāng)或正義的,也不是所有的剝削都是非正義的,判斷一種私有制與剝削方式正義與否,主要應(yīng)看它是否具有必然性與現(xiàn)實(shí)性,當(dāng)一種私有制與剝削形式具有歷史必然性并能促進(jìn)社會(huì)歷史進(jìn)步時(shí),它是具有正當(dāng)性的,只有當(dāng)一種私有制與剝削形式喪失了歷史必然性,并成為社會(huì)歷史進(jìn)步的障礙時(shí),它也就喪失了存在的合理性與正當(dāng)性。
[Abstract]:The emergence and existence of private ownership bring about an inevitable phenomenon: class oppression and class exploitation. Although not any private ownership necessarily leads to exploitation, it can be confirmed that the generation of exploitation is related to the existence of private ownership. The evaluation of private ownership and exploitation is naturally different for different classes because of their different social status. Generally speaking, exploitative classes usually resort to affirmation and justification for exploitation, while exploited classes resort to negation and criticism. How does Marx's view of history treat exploitation? In many people's thinking, it seems that Marx's view of history undoubtedly takes a negative and critical attitude towards the phenomenon of private ownership and exploitation, and some even regard Marxism as a theory of criticizing private ownership. This is a serious misreading. In Marx's view of history, the emergence of private ownership and exploitation has brought disaster to the exploited class, but it is a necessary stage of human civilization, and not all exploitation is just or just. Not all exploitation is unjust. To judge whether a form of private ownership and exploitation is just or not, one should mainly look at whether it has inevitability and reality. When a form of private ownership and exploitation has historical inevitability and can promote social and historical progress, it is legitimate, only when a form of private ownership and exploitation loses its historical inevitability and becomes an obstacle to social and historical progress. It also lost the rationality and legitimacy of existence.
【作者單位】： 華中師范大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：A81
，

本文編號(hào)：1918831