本文關(guān)鍵詞：論科技異化的產(chǎn)生與克服　出處：《燕山大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 勞動異化 科技異化 意識形態(tài) 異化克服 科學(xué)發(fā)展觀

【摘要】：科學(xué)技術(shù)的進步不僅改變了人們的生活和生存方式，同時也不斷的改造著人自身。尤其是在資本主義社會中，科學(xué)技術(shù)為資本所綁架，導(dǎo)致了科學(xué)技術(shù)的異化�？茖W(xué)技術(shù)不僅沒有為人的解放和發(fā)展服務(wù)，反而成為阻礙人的解放和發(fā)展的異己力量威脅著人類的生存。 該文主要分三個部分對科學(xué)技術(shù)異化產(chǎn)生的原因、西方馬克主義異化理論以及關(guān)于科學(xué)技術(shù)異化的解決方法進行研究。首先，分析科學(xué)技術(shù)異化產(chǎn)生的歷史根源和社會背景。私有制導(dǎo)致了勞動異化，而勞動異化又引發(fā)科學(xué)技術(shù)的異化，因此私有制是成為科學(xué)技術(shù)異化的根源。勞動分工無疑又加深了科學(xué)技術(shù)的異化。其次，主要敘述西方馬克思主義科技異化理論。隨著工業(yè)社會的發(fā)展，科學(xué)技術(shù)異化在新的歷史環(huán)境中發(fā)展到了新的階段。在這一階段西方馬克思主義對此作了詳盡的闡釋，并為解決科學(xué)技術(shù)異化問題提出了令人深思的解決方案。最后，雖然西方馬克思主義提出了解決科學(xué)技術(shù)異化問題的種種方案，但是仍然難免有其局限之處。該文最終站在馬克思主義哲學(xué)的立場之上，通過對西方馬克思主義的借鑒提出解決科學(xué)技術(shù)問題的一些見解，最終闡明科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展與人類進步之間的內(nèi)在關(guān)系。 該文采用文獻研究法，比較研究法和歸納與演繹相結(jié)合的方法，得出結(jié)論科學(xué)技術(shù)異化是由勞動異化引起的，勞動異化和科技異化都是人類社會發(fā)展史上不可逾越的特定階段。西馬在解決科學(xué)技術(shù)異化問題時拋棄了具體的社會環(huán)境，，認為科學(xué)技術(shù)異化問題是由科學(xué)技術(shù)本身發(fā)展的不合理性引起的，具有很大的局限性。該文站在先賢的研究基礎(chǔ)之上指出，要解決科學(xué)技術(shù)異化問題，既要著眼于長遠，又不能忽視當(dāng)下，要把對社會制度的批判和在科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展中堅持以人為本結(jié)合起來。除此之外，我們也應(yīng)當(dāng)加強對科學(xué)技術(shù)發(fā)展的引導(dǎo)和規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The progress of science and technology has not only changed people's life and way of life, but also constantly reformed themselves. Especially in capitalist society, science and technology is kidnapped by capital. Science and technology not only do not serve for the liberation and development of human beings, but also become the dissident forces that hinder the emancipation and development of human beings, which threaten the survival of human beings. This article mainly divides into three parts to study the reason of the alienation of science and technology, the western theory of alienation of Mark and the solution of the alienation of science and technology. This paper analyzes the historical origin and social background of the alienation of science and technology. The private ownership leads to the alienation of labor, and the alienation of labor leads to the alienation of science and technology. Therefore, private ownership is the root of science and technology alienation. The division of labor undoubtedly deepens the alienation of science and technology. Secondly, it mainly narrates the western Marxist theory of science and technology alienation with the development of industrial society. The alienation of science and technology has developed to a new stage in the new historical environment. Finally, although Western Marxism put forward a variety of solutions to solve the problem of alienation of science and technology. However, there are still some limitations. This article finally stands on the standpoint of Marxist philosophy and puts forward some ideas to solve the problems of science and technology through the reference of western Marxism. Finally, the internal relationship between the development of science and technology and human progress is clarified. This paper adopts the method of literature research, comparative research and the combination of induction and deduction, and draws the conclusion that the alienation of science and technology is caused by the alienation of labor. The alienation of labor and technology is an insurmountable stage in the history of the development of human society. Sima abandoned the concrete social environment in solving the problem of alienation of science and technology. This paper points out that the dissimilation of science and technology is caused by the irrationality of the development of science and technology itself and has great limitations. This paper points out that the problem of alienation of science and technology should be solved on the basis of the research of the forefathers. We should not only focus on the long term, but also not ignore the present, we should combine the criticism of social system with the people-oriented in the development of science and technology. We should also strengthen the guidance and standardization of the development of science and technology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：A811

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 荊筱槐;陳凡;;芬伯格的技術(shù)價值觀理論解析[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

2 梁麗;包國光;;試析技術(shù)異化的勞動異化根源[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

3 劉永謀;;機器與統(tǒng)治——馬克思科學(xué)技術(shù)論的權(quán)力之維[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)研究;2012年01期

4 李桂花;蔡軍迎;;哈貝馬斯“第一位的生產(chǎn)力”與鄧小平“第一生產(chǎn)力”之比較[J];理論學(xué)刊;2013年04期

5 艾四林;哈貝馬斯交往理論評析[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1995年03期

6 李桂花;張媛媛;;超越單向度的人——論馬爾庫塞的科技異化批判理論[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2012年07期

7 陳智;;哈貝馬斯科學(xué)技術(shù)意識形態(tài)論探析[J];自然辯證法研究;2006年11期

8 朱鳳青;;論芬伯格的技術(shù)民主化思想[J];自然辯證法研究;2010年06期

9 鄧曉芒;;勞動異化及其根源[J];中國社會科學(xué);1983年03期

10 J.哈貝馬斯;李黎;;生產(chǎn)力與交往——答 H.-P.克魯格[J];哲學(xué)譯叢;1992年06期

本文編號：1387843