本文以幽默話語(yǔ)中發(fā)話人和受話人的互動(dòng)關(guān)系為出發(fā)點(diǎn),從語(yǔ)言的邏輯性和語(yǔ)用角度分析幽默語(yǔ)言的制笑機(jī)理,側(cè)重分析言語(yǔ)事件中由于視角不同,造成邏輯錯(cuò)位及特定環(huán)境下語(yǔ)用聯(lián)系的缺失而產(chǎn)生的幽默。 第一章是對(duì)論文的概述,交待寫作目的、語(yǔ)料來(lái)源、研究方法和論文的結(jié)構(gòu)布局。 第二章是文獻(xiàn)回顧,探討了腳本論,不協(xié)調(diào)論等幽默理論,及語(yǔ)言交際中的會(huì)話原則本文特輯關(guān)注的是從認(rèn)知角度出發(fā)的不協(xié)調(diào)論,而腳本論則是不協(xié)調(diào)幽默理論在語(yǔ)言學(xué)領(lǐng)域的載體。不協(xié)調(diào)理論最早由斯派格爾提出后得到眾多學(xué)者推崇。雖然他們對(duì)于腳本有不同的定義,但都認(rèn)為腳本對(duì)立產(chǎn)生不協(xié)調(diào)是幽默的本質(zhì)原因,還認(rèn)為單有不協(xié)調(diào)并不足以構(gòu)成幽默,必須加上對(duì)不協(xié)調(diào)的釋放和頓悟才會(huì)構(gòu)成幽默。腳本論由拉斯金提出,腳本指詞匯所描述的場(chǎng)景和行為。這一學(xué)說(shuō)認(rèn)為當(dāng)文本滿足兩個(gè)條件時(shí)才能構(gòu)成幽默:第一,文本中有兩個(gè)完全或部分不同的腳本,第二,兩個(gè)腳本在此文本中完全或部分對(duì)立。阿塔多和拉斯金后來(lái)共同擴(kuò)展了這一學(xué)說(shuō),在腳本對(duì)立的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了幽默中語(yǔ)言、敘述策略、取笑對(duì)象、情境、邏輯機(jī)制等六大因素。對(duì)幽默研究文獻(xiàn)的回顧,構(gòu)成了本文案例分析的基礎(chǔ)。... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：59 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Chapter One Introduction
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Close Relationship between Logic and Pragmatics
        2.1.1 Logic, Language, and Humor
        2.1.2 Logic, Meaning, and Humor
        2.1.3 Logic, Pragmatics, and Humor
    2.2 Other Theories of Humor
        2.2.1 The SSTH Theory of Humor
            2.2.1.1 Scripts
            2.2.1.2 Overlapping
            2.2.1.3 Oppositeness
        2.2.2 The GTVH Theory of Humor
        2.2.3 The Incongruity Theory
        2.2.4 Arthur Koestler’s Theory on Humor
Chapter Three Logical and Pragmatic Analysis on Humor
    3.1 Humor from Logical Deviation
        3.1.1 Violation of the Law of Identity
            3.1.1.1 Concepts Confusion
            3.1.1.2 Concepts Substitution
            3.1.1.3 Topics Substitution
            3.1.1.4 Topics Divergence
        3.1.2 Violation of the Law of Non-contradiction
        3.1.3 Violation of the Law of Middle Excluded
        3.1.4 Violation of the Law of Ample Reasons
        3.1.5 Likelihood
        3.1.6 Unexpected Results from Inferencing
    3.2 Humor from Pragmatic Considerations
        3.2.1 Shared Knowledge and Humor
        3.2.2 Converstional Implicature and Humor
Chapter Four Conclusion
    4.1 General Summary
    4.2 Possible Theoretical and Practical Significance
    4.3 Limitations and Further Suggestions for Further Study
References



本文編號(hào)：3695208