【摘要】：海德格爾在其思想道路上總是一再地深入探討邏輯問題。對邏輯問題的思考不僅激發(fā)了海德格爾的早期著作,而且也有力地激發(fā)了他以《存在與時間》為標志的成熟哲學(xué)。本文的研究目的就在于展示前期海德格爾對邏輯問題的思考。本文所要探討的主要內(nèi)容有三部分： 首先,本文展示出海德格爾的思想起點既不是對Sein多重含義的統(tǒng)一問題的迷戀,也不是直到1919才出現(xiàn)的“實際生活經(jīng)驗”,而是青年海德格爾對作為邏輯的對象的“意義”的追問。從海德格爾早期的邏輯研究到后來的《存在與時間》,實際上貫穿著一條追問邏輯之根的思想線索。 本文的主體部分是展示海德格爾對時間與邏輯之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性的思考。它分為兩個大的部分。首先展示出,在對范疇問題的進一步思考的基礎(chǔ)上,海德格爾提出了作為一切對象得以被給予的條件的意義,而對意義的深入探究使得海德格爾將它追溯到了綻出的-境遇的時間性。而在澄清作為原運動的時間性之后,在第二部分中,本文在展示出從時間性原初的綻出運動到作為此在的理解的投射運動的基礎(chǔ)上,對海德格爾關(guān)于系詞、陳述、真、“學(xué)”進行闡釋。 最后,本文對形式論證與先驗論證進行了比較,并在康德的先驗論證的背景下展示海德格爾的先驗論證思想。 本文在最后得出結(jié)論：1)海德格爾的邏輯之思是按照先驗論證的策略對邏輯得以可能的基礎(chǔ)存在學(xué)上的必要條件的探索。2)海德格爾所說的邏輯與時間的關(guān)聯(lián)性是基于其意義理論與存在學(xué)而做出的。3)形而上學(xué)為邏輯奠基,海德格爾這一思想的合法性在于形而上學(xué)使邏輯成為對我們來說有意義的東西。4)海德格爾對資格問題的思考是基于作為“給予意義”與統(tǒng)一含義的命名原則。
[Abstract]:Heidegger always delves deeply into logic problems in his thought path. The consideration of logical problems not only inspired Heidegger's early works, but also inspired his mature philosophy marked by being and time. The purpose of this paper is to show Heidegger's thinking on logic problems. The main contents of this paper are as follows: firstly, this paper shows that Heidegger's ideological starting point is neither infatuated with the unification of the multiple meanings of Sein, nor is it the "real life experience" that did not appear until 1919. It is the young Heidegger's questioning of the meaning as the object of logic. From Heidegger's early logic research to later existence and time, it actually runs through a clue of questioning the root of logic. The main part of this paper is to show Heidegger's thinking about the relationship between time and logic. It is divided into two large parts. First of all, on the basis of further thinking on category issues, Heidegger puts forward the meaning of the conditions that can be given to all objects. And the deep exploration of meaning makes Heidegger trace it back to the time of situation. And after clarifying the temporality of the original motion, in the second part, on the basis of showing the projective motion from the original movement of time to the understanding of it as such, this paper gives Heidegger a statement, a truth about the system word. "Learning" is explained. Finally, this paper compares formal argumentation with transcendental argumentation, and presents Heidegger's transcendental argumentation under the background of Kant's transcendental argumentation. Finally, this paper draws the following conclusions: 1) Heidegger's logical thinking is the exploration of the necessary conditions for the existence of logic to be possible according to the strategy of a transcendental argument. 2) Heidegger's argument that logic is related to time is Based on the theory of meaning and existentialism. 3) metaphysics is the foundation of logic. The legitimacy of Heidegger's thought lies in the fact that metaphysics makes logic meaningful to us. 4) Heidegger's thinking on qualification is based on the naming principle of "giving meaning" and unified meaning.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：B516.54;B81-095

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 徐向東;先驗論證與懷疑論[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

2 張汝倫;論海德格爾哲學(xué)的起點[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

3 張柯;;真理與有效性——論洛采邏輯思想對海德格爾的影響[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2008年02期

4 龐學(xué)銓;也談關(guān)于Ontology的翻譯[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2002年04期

，

本文編號：2285788