本文選題：辯證邏輯 + contradiction　； 參考：《邏輯學(xué)研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：長(zhǎng)期以來,中國(guó)邏輯學(xué)界圍繞"辯證邏輯"的主要爭(zhēng)議是這一邏輯是否可能存在。這種僅僅圍繞基本概念的討論因缺乏共識(shí)而難以為繼,在現(xiàn)代邏輯的研究范式?jīng)_擊下逐漸消亡。本文試圖為讀者展現(xiàn)一種近年來為學(xué)界逐漸接受的更加務(wù)實(shí)的方法。這種方法旨在考慮形式邏輯表達(dá)哲學(xué)上的"辯證"概念,并將其視為邏輯系統(tǒng)正當(dāng)性的來源。這一進(jìn)路促使國(guó)內(nèi)不同領(lǐng)域的學(xué)者們先后提出了多種相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的辯證邏輯。進(jìn)一步,盡管對(duì)辯證這一概念的理想翻譯可能是不存在的,但我們沒有理由將這樣一種尚在探索的邏輯排除在邏輯家族之外。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the main controversy around dialectical logic in Chinese logics circles is whether this logic can exist. Due to the lack of consensus, this kind of discussion, which only revolves around basic concepts, is gradually dying out under the impact of the research paradigm of modern logic. This paper attempts to show readers a more pragmatic approach that has gradually been accepted by scholars in recent years. The purpose of this method is to consider the concept of "dialectical" in the philosophy of formal logic expression and regard it as the source of logic system legitimacy. This route has prompted scholars in different fields to put forward a variety of competing dialectical logic. Furthermore, although the ideal translation of the concept of dialectics may not exist, there is no reason to exclude such a logic, which is still exploring, from the logical family.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)法政學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：B811
，

本文編號(hào)：2094093