本文選題：五代蜀王　切入點(diǎn)：寶墩古城　出處：《天府新論》2017年02期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),由于文獻(xiàn)資料的缺乏,人們對(duì)于先秦時(shí)期成都的都城歷史研究,只能依賴(lài)《蜀王本紀(jì)》《華陽(yáng)國(guó)志》等少數(shù)漢代以后的文獻(xiàn)。由于這些文獻(xiàn)對(duì)早期蜀國(guó)歷史的記載內(nèi)容較為簡(jiǎn)略,對(duì)有些人和事語(yǔ)焉不詳,甚至還帶有若干神話傳說(shuō)色彩,因而后世研究者多對(duì)這些文獻(xiàn)持懷疑態(tài)度,甚至有人認(rèn)為這些文獻(xiàn)所載非信史,只是歷史傳說(shuō)。隨著20世紀(jì)中葉以后,以今成都城區(qū)為中心半徑約30公里的范圍內(nèi)相繼進(jìn)行了一系列考古發(fā)掘,其中三星堆遺址、寶墩遺址、十二橋遺址、船棺遺址和金沙遺址等多個(gè)考古新發(fā)現(xiàn),揭開(kāi)了古蜀文明的迷霧,使?fàn)N爛輝煌的古蜀文明重現(xiàn)于世,成都?xì)v史由傳說(shuō)變?yōu)閭髌�。成都系列考古新發(fā)現(xiàn)印證了《蜀王本紀(jì)》《華陽(yáng)國(guó)志》等文獻(xiàn)所記載早蜀歷史具有可信性。
[Abstract]:For a long time, due to the lack of literature, people have studied the history of Chengdu's capital in the pre-Qin period. We can only rely on a small number of documents after the Han Dynasty, such as "the Book of the Kingdom of Shu" and "Huayang Guozhi". As these documents are relatively simple in terms of the history of the early Shu kingdom, they are vague about some people and things, and even have some mythological and legends color. As a result, later generations of researchers were sceptical of these documents, and some even thought that the non-religious history contained in these documents was only historical legends. After the middle of 20th century, A series of archaeological excavations have been carried out within a radius of about 30 kilometers in the present Chengdu urban area. Among them, Sanxingdui site, Baodun site, 12 bridge site, boat coffin site and Jinsha site, etc., have been discovered. It uncovers the fog of ancient Shu civilization, reappears the splendid ancient Shu civilization, and turns Chengdu history from legend to legend. A series of new archaeological discoveries in Chengdu confirm the credibility of the early Shu history recorded in the documents such as "the Book of the King of Shu" and "the History of the State of Huayang".
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)城市研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)城市通史編纂”(編號(hào):12AZD083)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K878
，

本文編號(hào)：1594042