本文關鍵詞： 李濟 中國考古學 歷史法 張光直 人類學研究 青銅文化 殷墟文化 仰韶 考古學界 考古學方法 　出處：《考古學報》2014年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正目次一中國人類學家的可能貢獻:語言與比較二作為"比較法"基礎的"歷史法":小范圍與細節(jié)發(fā)掘三"歷史法"對"比較法"的單向制約:器物分類有"邏輯"四回應批評;討論器物"功能"的路徑五要"準確"還是要"合理"在李濟去世后的二十年里,他的學生張光直通過檢討現(xiàn)代中國考古學發(fā)展史,有力地彰顯了李濟對中國考古學的貢獻,尤其是扭轉了大陸考古學界對李濟的忽視。但張光直亦非無原則地贊譽,他相當中肯地提出李濟在四個方面的影響~[1],同時尖銳地指出現(xiàn)代中國考古學的歷
[Abstract]:The possible contribution of Chinese anthropologists: language and comparison: "Historical Law" as the basis of "Comparative Law": "small scope and detail excavation" three "Historical Law" on the "Comparative Law" one-way constraints: the classification of objects. Logic "four responses to criticism;" The way to discuss the "function" of objects five is to be "accurate" or "reasonable" in the 20 years since Li Ji's death, Zhang Guangzhi, his student, has reviewed the history of archaeology in modern China. It has demonstrated Li Ji's contribution to Chinese archaeology, especially in reversing the neglect of Li Ji in mainland archaeology circles. But Zhang Guangzhi is not unprincipled praise, he fairly pointed out Li Ji's influence in four aspects ~. [At the same time pointed out acutely the calendar of modern Chinese archaeology
【作者單位】： 四川大學歷史文化學院;
【基金】：四川大學中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務費專項項目(SKJC201002)和(SKGT201204)的資助
【分類號】：K854
，

本文編號：1493104