本文關(guān)鍵詞： 城市化 越南河內(nèi) 拆遷補(bǔ)償 政府職能　出處：《廣西民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近幾年來(lái)，經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)發(fā)展，城市化進(jìn)程不斷加快�？茖W(xué)合理的城市房屋拆遷是完善基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、提高居民生活質(zhì)量、提高土地利用率、增強(qiáng)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力的重大舉措。但是也要看到，城市房屋拆遷工作是一項(xiàng)政策性、群眾性、經(jīng)濟(jì)性都很強(qiáng)，復(fù)雜而又艱難的工作。城市房屋拆遷是關(guān)系到城市建設(shè)與發(fā)展，關(guān)系到保護(hù)群眾利益、維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定、推進(jìn)城市化進(jìn)程、拉動(dòng)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重大現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。城市房屋拆遷、安置工作的成敗直接影響國(guó)家城市規(guī)劃戰(zhàn)略的推進(jìn)，也是社會(huì)、民心穩(wěn)定的重要因素。城市房屋拆遷、安置已經(jīng)成為政府和社會(huì)共同關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題，而城市拆遷補(bǔ)償問(wèn)題更是民眾所關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)。越南城市拆遷補(bǔ)償制度從開(kāi)始到不斷的完善，體現(xiàn)出了越南政府在改革的過(guò)程中政策的執(zhí)行和調(diào)整力度的不斷加大。從近些年越南國(guó)內(nèi)拆遷的情況來(lái)看，暴力拆遷、強(qiáng)行拆遷等現(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生，而這在很大程度在折射出了越南政府與民眾利益博奕的緊張關(guān)系。越南政府出臺(tái)和不斷調(diào)整的征地賠償制度，，目的在政府與民眾利益矛盾當(dāng)中尋求平衡點(diǎn)，而這些政策的執(zhí)行和調(diào)整對(duì)于越南城市房屋拆遷來(lái)說(shuō)也是一個(gè)不斷進(jìn)步的過(guò)程。 本文首先從城市化發(fā)展的角度來(lái)探究拆遷對(duì)于城市化進(jìn)程的影響力，從國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者的研究動(dòng)態(tài)來(lái)分析越南城市化過(guò)程中，拆遷所體現(xiàn)出來(lái)的阻礙力，及城市化所急需解決的諸如拆遷矛盾，對(duì)城市拆遷理論、城市拆遷的概念和性質(zhì)、公共利益和政府補(bǔ)償責(zé)任進(jìn)行了梳理。重點(diǎn)對(duì)政府行為責(zé)任的理論分析。如城市拆遷中的政府工具，包括城市拆遷中政府工具的分類(lèi)界定，政府工具選擇的影響因素等方面的研究。 本文對(duì)越南河內(nèi)城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償中政府職能行使現(xiàn)狀和存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了研究，主要分析了越南城市拆遷補(bǔ)償相關(guān)法律制度的發(fā)展沿革，從越南的土地政策、征地拆遷補(bǔ)償制度等角度進(jìn)行分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上研究越南河內(nèi)城市房屋拆遷的現(xiàn)狀，著重從河內(nèi)拆遷補(bǔ)償方式和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和河內(nèi)房屋拆遷評(píng)估幾個(gè)方面來(lái)分析。而對(duì)于河內(nèi)城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償中政府責(zé)任行使現(xiàn)狀的研究，本文主要從政府宏觀、市場(chǎng)、社會(huì)三個(gè)角度來(lái)闡述。 本文研究了南寧城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償?shù)慕?jīng)驗(yàn)，以南寧市興寧區(qū)歷史文化街區(qū)房屋拆遷補(bǔ)為案例，以此作為河內(nèi)拆遷補(bǔ)償?shù)慕?jīng)驗(yàn)啟示。 本文探討越南河內(nèi)城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償制度的完善措施，主要從城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償中政府職能定位、城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償中政府市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管職能定位以及城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償中政府社會(huì)管理職能定位。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the sustained development of economy and the acceleration of urbanization. Scientific and reasonable demolition of urban housing is to improve the infrastructure construction, improve the quality of life of the residents, and improve the utilization of land. But we should also see that urban housing demolition and relocation is a policy, mass, economic, complex and difficult work. Urban housing demolition is related to urban construction and development. Related to the protection of the interests of the masses, maintaining social stability, promoting the process of urbanization, stimulating regional economic development, the major practical problems. The success or failure of urban housing demolition and resettlement directly affects the promotion of national urban planning strategy, and is also a society. Urban housing demolition and resettlement have become the focus of common concern of the government and society. However, the issue of compensation for urban demolition is a hot topic of public concern. The compensation system for urban demolition in Vietnam has been continuously improved from the beginning to the end. This reflects the increasing implementation and adjustment of policies by the Vietnamese government in the process of reform. From the situation of domestic demolition in Vietnam in recent years, violent demolition, forced demolition and other phenomena occur from time to time. To a large extent, this reflects the tense relationship between the Vietnamese government and the public interests. The Vietnamese government has introduced and constantly adjusted the land requisition compensation system in order to find a balance between the government and the public's interests. The implementation and adjustment of these policies is also a progressive process for urban housing demolition in Vietnam. This paper first explores the influence of demolition on the process of urbanization from the perspective of urbanization development, and analyzes the hindrance of demolition in the process of urbanization in Vietnam from the research trends of scholars at home and abroad. For example, the contradiction of demolition, the theory of urban demolition, the concept and nature of urban demolition, Public interest and government compensation responsibility are combed. The theoretical analysis of government behavior responsibility is emphasized. For example, government tools in urban demolition, including the classification and definition of government tools in urban demolition. Research on the factors influencing the choice of government tools. This paper studies the status quo and existing problems of government function in urban housing demolition compensation in Hanoi, Vietnam, mainly analyzes the development and evolution of the relevant legal system of urban demolition compensation in Vietnam, and analyzes the land policy of Vietnam. Based on the analysis of compensation system for land expropriation and removal, the present situation of urban house demolition in Hanoi, Vietnam, is studied. Focusing on Hanoi demolition compensation methods and standards and Hanoi housing demolition evaluation several aspects. And for Hanoi urban housing demolition compensation in the status quo of government responsibility, this paper mainly from the government macro, market, Social three angles to elaborate. This paper studies the experience of housing demolition compensation in Nanning city, taking the housing demolition and compensation of historical and cultural blocks in Xingning District of Nanning City as a case, as the inspiration of Hanoi relocation compensation experience. This paper discusses the perfect measures of the compensation system of urban house demolition in Hanoi, Vietnam, mainly from the position of government function in the compensation of urban house demolition. The function of government market supervision in urban house demolition compensation and the function of government social management in urban house demolition compensation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D733.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張明;農(nóng)民權(quán)利保護(hù)視野下的土地征收制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 蔡樂(lè)渭;論行政法上的公共利益[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

3 張婧飛;論對(duì)行政強(qiáng)制權(quán)的控制[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1536860