本文關(guān)鍵詞： 大隈重信 對(duì)華觀 “支那保全論” “東西文明調(diào)和論”　出處：《南開大學(xué)》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：大隈重信（1838-1922）是日本近代著名的政黨政治家、思想家、教育家，也是一個(gè)在日本社會(huì)迄今仍頗存爭(zhēng)議的人物。大隈的人生經(jīng)歷曲折復(fù)雜，其對(duì)外思想中的對(duì)華觀以及他在日本對(duì)華行動(dòng)選擇中所起的作用，應(yīng)該說是引人矚目的焦點(diǎn)之一。在其對(duì)外思想和對(duì)華觀方面，大隈標(biāo)榜的“支那保全論”和“東西文明調(diào)和論”流傳甚廣，并且富有欺騙性；而在近代日本對(duì)華行動(dòng)選擇中大隈所起的作用方面，大隈的政策主張表面上與武力征華的強(qiáng)硬派有所區(qū)別，但從其主政時(shí)提出“對(duì)華二十一條要求”的丑惡行徑看，可謂“圖窮匕首見”，旨在控制、統(tǒng)治乃至滅亡中國(guó)的本質(zhì)沒有不同。重要的是，在近代日本的政界、民間和學(xué)界，“大隈流”的對(duì)華觀有一批忠實(shí)的聽眾和追捧者，映襯出那個(gè)時(shí)代日本對(duì)華認(rèn)識(shí)主流思潮的縮影。因此，以大隈重信為典型，考察其中國(guó)觀形成演化的背景，剖析其思想結(jié)構(gòu)和內(nèi)容，剝下其偽善面孔，，揭露其本質(zhì)，對(duì)于深化近代日本的中國(guó)認(rèn)識(shí)及其行動(dòng)選擇研究，無疑具有重要學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 鑒于日本學(xué)界的相關(guān)評(píng)價(jià)分歧判然、我國(guó)學(xué)界的相關(guān)研究零散而不系統(tǒng)的現(xiàn)狀，本文運(yùn)用辯證唯物論和歷史唯物論的理論方法，以具有代表性的原始資料為依據(jù)、相關(guān)研究文獻(xiàn)為參考，系統(tǒng)梳理了明治大正時(shí)期大隈重信的對(duì)華觀形成和發(fā)展軌跡，分析了其對(duì)華觀的內(nèi)容和結(jié)構(gòu)，闡明了其對(duì)華觀的基本特點(diǎn)和實(shí)質(zhì)，指出了其對(duì)華觀在近代日本思想史、近代中日關(guān)系史中的作用和影響。 本文由序章、正文和終章三部分構(gòu)成。正文的四章依次闡述了大隈重信早期對(duì)華觀形成的環(huán)境和基本特征，甲午戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)后至辛亥革命時(shí)期對(duì)華觀的發(fā)展，一戰(zhàn)時(shí)期對(duì)華觀的衍變，“東西文明調(diào)和論”下的對(duì)華觀等。終章從“大隈重信對(duì)華觀的主要內(nèi)容”、“大隈對(duì)華觀的基本特征”、“大隈對(duì)華觀的影響”三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了歸納性總結(jié)。 基于上述研究思路進(jìn)行的實(shí)證考察，本文在國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)界先行研究的基礎(chǔ)上有所發(fā)現(xiàn)和收獲，這主要體現(xiàn)在以下四個(gè)方面。第一，首次在國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界系統(tǒng)地研究了大隈重信的對(duì)華觀。第二，對(duì)大隈重信“支那保全論”的提出、思想主張、演變及本質(zhì)進(jìn)行了深入考察，并與近衛(wèi)篤灴的“支那保全論”進(jìn)行了比較分析。第三，系統(tǒng)探究了大隈重信“東西文明調(diào)和論”的產(chǎn)生背景、主要觀點(diǎn)、理論框架、內(nèi)在本質(zhì)及在外交實(shí)踐的應(yīng)用。第四，駁斥了渡邊幾治郎、木村時(shí)夫等日本學(xué)者為大隈重信內(nèi)閣強(qiáng)迫中國(guó)簽訂“二十一條”這一歷史事實(shí)所做的種種辯解，認(rèn)為大隈重信內(nèi)閣提出的“對(duì)華二十一條要求”，雖然也有元老和民眾推動(dòng)的因素，但歸根結(jié)底是有其思想基礎(chǔ)的，是最能反映大隈對(duì)華觀本質(zhì)的行動(dòng)體現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Okuma (1838-1922) is a famous political party politician, thinker, educator and a controversial figure in Japanese society. The life experience of Okuma is complicated. The concept of China in his foreign thoughts and his role in Japan's choice of action against China should be said to be one of the focuses of attention. Okuma's "** preservation theory" and "East-West Civilization Harmony Theory" are widely spread and deceptive; On the other hand, in modern Japan's choice of action against China, the policy of Okuma is different from that of the hardliners who invaded China by force on the surface. But from the ugly behavior of putting forward "21 demands on China" when he was in power, it can be described as "trying to see a poor dagger", the essence of which is not different in order to control, rule or even destroy China. What is important is that in modern Japanese politics. Folk and academic circles, "Okuma flow" has a group of loyal listeners and admirers of Huaguan, against that era of Japanese understanding of the mainstream trend of thought in China epitomized. This paper examines the background of the formation and evolution of his view of China, analyzes its ideological structure and content, strips off its hypocritical face, exposes its essence, and studies the deepening of China's understanding and its choice of action in modern Japan. Undoubtedly, it has important academic value and practical significance. In view of the difference of relevant evaluation in Japanese academic circles and the scattered and unsystematic current situation of relevant research in Chinese academic circles, this paper uses the theoretical methods of dialectical materialism and historical materialism. Based on the representative original data and relevant research documents, this paper systematically combs the formation and development track of Okuma Shunxin's concept of Hua in the Meiji period, and analyzes its content and structure. This paper expounds the basic characteristics and essence of his view on Chinese, and points out its function and influence in the history of modern Japanese thought and the history of Sino-Japanese relations. This paper consists of three parts: preface, text and final chapter. The four chapters of the text explain in turn the environment and basic characteristics of the formation of the concept of Hua in the early days of Okuma, and the development of the concept of Hua from the Jiawu War to the Revolution of 1911. During the first World War, the evolution of the concept of Chinese, "the East and West Civilization Harmonization Theory", etc. The final chapter from "the main content of Okuma to the concept of Hua," "the basic characteristics of Okuma's view of China." The influence of Okuma on Huaguan is summarized in three aspects. Based on the above research ideas of empirical investigation, this paper in the domestic and foreign academic research on the basis of some findings and gains, which is mainly reflected in the following four aspects. First. For the first time in the domestic academic circles, the author systematically studied Okuma's view of Hua. Secondly, the author made a thorough study of Okuma's "preservation theory of **", thought, evolution and essence. And compared with the preservation theory of ** by the close Wei Tui. Third, it systematically explores the background, the main point of view, and the theoretical framework of Okuma's "East and West Civilization Harmonization Theory". Internal essence and its application in diplomatic practice. 4th refutes all kinds of justifications made by Japanese scholars such as Ijiro Watanabe and Shifu Kimura for the historical fact that Okuma's cabinet forced China to sign "21 articles". It is believed that the "21 demands on China" put forward by Okuma's cabinet have their ideological basis and reflect the essence of Okuma's view of Hua in the final analysis, although there are also factors for the elders and the masses to promote them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南開大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D731.3;K313

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫立祥;日本右翼勢(shì)力的“自衛(wèi)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)史觀”辨正[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

2 孫立祥;日本右翼勢(shì)力的“解放戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)史觀”辨正[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

3 盛邦和;19世紀(jì)與20世紀(jì)之交的日本亞洲主義[J];歷史研究;2000年03期

4 戚其章;日本大亞細(xì)亞主義探析——兼與盛邦和先生商榷[J];歷史研究;2004年03期

5 盛邦和;日本亞洲主義與右翼思潮源流——兼對(duì)戚其章先生的回應(yīng)[J];歷史研究;2005年03期

6 楊棟梁;王美平;;日本“早期亞洲主義”思潮辨析——兼與盛邦和、戚其章先生商榷[J];日本學(xué)刊;2009年03期

7 吳懷中;“文明史觀”在近代日本對(duì)華認(rèn)識(shí)及關(guān)系中的影響——從思想史與國(guó)際關(guān)系的接點(diǎn)出發(fā)[J];日本學(xué)刊;1998年05期

8 孫立祥;駁日本右翼勢(shì)力的“不得已侵略說”——以日俄戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、日韓合并、“二十一條”為中心[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2005年02期

9 劉黎紅;五四時(shí)期中西文化調(diào)和論的互動(dòng)——兼論五四時(shí)期中國(guó)文化調(diào)和論興起的外在刺激因素[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

10 黃尊嚴(yán);1914年日本對(duì)德宣戰(zhàn)動(dòng)因新探[J];文史哲;1996年04期

本文編號(hào)：1446401