發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-25 09:18

【摘要】：社區(qū)營造是臺(tái)灣上世紀(jì)90年代實(shí)施的一種以文化元素為紐結(jié)、以產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展為支撐、以社區(qū)共同體建設(shè)為目標(biāo)的綜合性社會(huì)工程。因其良好的政策效果,社區(qū)營造的模式對(duì)大陸地區(qū)的農(nóng)村建設(shè)與新型城鎮(zhèn)化具有很大的借鑒意義。通過對(duì)臺(tái)灣珍珠社區(qū)和上海雪米村社區(qū)營造的比較分析,本文從人文要素中的營造主體、營造動(dòng)力、營造體系三個(gè)方面總結(jié)了兩岸社區(qū)營造模式的差異,并進(jìn)一步指出,有效推進(jìn)后鄉(xiāng)土?xí)r代的農(nóng)村建設(shè)、以系統(tǒng)化的思維統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展并尊重農(nóng)民的主體地位,是大陸在推動(dòng)新型城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中所面臨的重要挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:Community building is a kind of comprehensive social engineering implemented in Taiwan in 1990s, which is based on cultural elements, supported by industrial development and aimed at community construction. Because of its good policy effect, the mode of community construction has great reference significance for rural construction and new urbanization in mainland China. Through the comparative analysis of pearl community in Taiwan and the community construction in Xemi Village in Shanghai, this paper sums up the differences of community construction modes between the two sides of the strait from three aspects: the main body of construction, the power of construction and the construction system, and further points out that, It is an important challenge for the mainland to effectively promote the rural construction in the post-local era, to coordinate the development of urban and rural areas with systematic thinking and to respect the principal position of farmers.
【作者單位】： 同濟(jì)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;復(fù)旦大學(xué)社會(huì)治理研究中心;
【基金】：2013年度國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“縣域維穩(wěn)運(yùn)行的邏輯與制度化研究”(13BZZ030) 上海市哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)中青班專項(xiàng)課題“依法治國進(jìn)程中完善大調(diào)解機(jī)制對(duì)策研究”(課題號(hào)20153501)
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3
，

本文編號(hào)：2415001