【摘要】：在非對(duì)稱(chēng)同盟中,由于成員國(guó)之間實(shí)力的差異,主導(dǎo)國(guó)對(duì)同盟的影響通常更加明顯。但是,大量的國(guó)際政治現(xiàn)實(shí)表明,同盟內(nèi)部關(guān)系的變化也與非主導(dǎo)國(guó)密不可分。通過(guò)對(duì)同盟內(nèi)部關(guān)系的不同調(diào)整,非主導(dǎo)國(guó)會(huì)對(duì)主導(dǎo)國(guó)采取緊密追隨、保持中立和主動(dòng)疏遠(yuǎn)三種策略。本文試圖去非對(duì)稱(chēng)同盟主要是雙邊同盟中,非主導(dǎo)國(guó)為什么會(huì)對(duì)同盟的內(nèi)部關(guān)系做出調(diào)整,這些調(diào)整結(jié)果是否具有差異性以及造成這種差異的原因等問(wèn)題。 本文采用理論與案例相結(jié)合的研究方法,認(rèn)為影響同盟內(nèi)部關(guān)系調(diào)整的原因主要有三個(gè)：結(jié)構(gòu)變化、安全平衡和同盟承諾。結(jié)構(gòu)的變化會(huì)影響同盟內(nèi)外環(huán)境的變化,包括同盟成員所面臨的安全環(huán)境的變化。而由于非主導(dǎo)國(guó)存在安全-自主的交易,它對(duì)安全威脅十分敏感,安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的變化對(duì)非主導(dǎo)國(guó)來(lái)說(shuō)至關(guān)重要。除此之外,當(dāng)非主導(dǎo)國(guó)面臨安全威脅時(shí),來(lái)自同盟的支持和承諾也會(huì)產(chǎn)生影響。在這三種因素的影響下,非主導(dǎo)國(guó)會(huì)對(duì)同盟內(nèi)部關(guān)系進(jìn)行調(diào)整,而這種調(diào)整所導(dǎo)致的結(jié)果也是不同的。而本文選取了“再平衡”戰(zhàn)略背景下的美菲同盟和美泰同盟作為研究案例,認(rèn)為結(jié)構(gòu)的變化引起了菲律賓和泰國(guó)兩國(guó)對(duì)安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的不同認(rèn)識(shí)。此外,美國(guó)在亞太地區(qū)的表態(tài)和承諾也對(duì)兩國(guó)產(chǎn)生了不同的影響。菲律賓采取了對(duì)美國(guó)緊密追隨的策略,而泰國(guó)則保持了相對(duì)中立的態(tài)度。
[Abstract]:In asymmetric alliances, the influence of the dominant countries on the alliance is usually more pronounced due to the differences of power among member countries. However, a large number of international political realities show that the changes in the alliance's internal relations are also inextricably linked to non-dominant countries. Through different adjustments to the relations within the alliance, the non-dominant countries will follow closely, remain neutral and actively alienate the leading countries. In this paper, we try to explain why non-dominant countries adjust the internal relations of asymmetric alliances, whether the results of these adjustments are different and the reasons for these differences. This paper adopts the research method of combining theory with case, and points out that there are three main reasons that influence the adjustment of alliance internal relations: structural change, security balance and alliance commitment. The change of structure will influence the change of the environment inside and outside the alliance, including the change of the security environment faced by the members of the alliance. Due to the existence of security-independent transactions in non-dominant countries, it is sensitive to security threats, and changes in security risks are crucial to non-dominant countries. In addition, support and commitment from allies can also have an impact when non-dominant countries face security threats. Under the influence of these three factors, the non-dominant countries will adjust the internal relations of the alliance, and the results of this adjustment will be different. In this paper, the US-Philippines alliance and the US-Thai alliance under the background of "rebalancing" strategy are selected as a case study, and it is concluded that the change of structure has led to different understandings of security risks between the Philippines and Thailand. In addition, the position and commitment of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region have had different effects on the two countries. The Philippines followed the US closely, while Thailand remained relatively neutral.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D814.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董向榮;;不對(duì)稱(chēng)同盟與韓國(guó)的反美主義[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2009年06期

2 馬榮久;;論地區(qū)與國(guó)家的相互塑造[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年02期

3 蘇若林;唐世平;;相互制約:聯(lián)盟管理的核心機(jī)制[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2012年03期

4 周建仁;;聯(lián)盟形成理論:評(píng)估及對(duì)中國(guó)的政策啟示[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2012年03期

5 黃琰婷;;淺析大湄公河次區(qū)域合作[J];東南亞縱橫;2007年09期

6 龔浩群;;泰國(guó)政治現(xiàn)代化研究述評(píng)——站在非西方國(guó)家的角度思考[J];東南亞研究;2008年03期

7 韓獻(xiàn)棟;;同盟政治的安全困境——連累拋棄模型的解釋力及其局限[J];國(guó)際論壇;2006年05期

8 周建仁;;同盟解體的研究:回顧與評(píng)析[J];國(guó)際論壇;2012年04期

9 曹金緒;;同盟政治理論的發(fā)展[J];國(guó)際政治科學(xué);2011年04期

10 林民旺;;沃馬克的結(jié)構(gòu)性錯(cuò)誤知覺(jué)理論研究[J];國(guó)際政治研究;2009年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 費(fèi)昭s，

本文編號(hào)：2217982