發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-21 12:14

  本文選題：民族主義 + 民族平等��； 參考：《貴州民族研究》2017年07期

【摘要】：從吳經(jīng)熊《中華民國(guó)憲法草案初稿試擬稿》到"五五憲草"的發(fā)展歷程來(lái)看,"各民族一律平等"入憲并不十分順利,且經(jīng)歷了兩次條文內(nèi)容的變更。其一度被刪是因?yàn)閼椃ú莅钙鸩菸瘑T會(huì)初稿主稿委員焦易堂認(rèn)為其與"人民一律平等"條重復(fù),及傅秉常擔(dān)憂其對(duì)中華民族造成分化。而其得以入憲及被修改的依據(jù),均是孫中山的民族主義思想。時(shí)人互相批評(píng),贊成或反對(duì)"民族平等"入憲,對(duì)條文的修改與解釋等,主要源于各自對(duì)孫中山民族主義的取舍和理解。
[Abstract]:From the development of Wu Jingxiong's preliminary draft draft of the Republic of China Constitution to the "May 5th Constitution draft", the entry of "all nationalities equal" into the Constitution is not very smooth, and it has undergone two changes in the content of the articles. It was once deleted because Jiao Yitang, a member of the drafting committee's draft draft, said it duplicated the "equality of the people" article, and Fu Ping-chang worried that it would divide the Chinese nation. The basis for its entry into the Constitution and amendment is Sun Zhongshan's nationalist thought. At that time, people criticized each other, approved or opposed "national equality" into the constitution, and amended and interpreted the articles, mainly from their choice and understanding of Sun Zhongshan's nationalism.
【作者單位】： 云南大學(xué)歷史與檔案學(xué)院;
【基金】：云南大學(xué)歷史與檔案學(xué)院中國(guó)史學(xué)科建設(shè)項(xiàng)目階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D693.0;D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 廖朝暉;;作為歷史插曲的五五憲草[J];大經(jīng)貿(mào);2012年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1782391