本文關(guān)鍵詞：協(xié)商民主在全面依法治國進程中的地位和作用研究　出處：《遼寧大學》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 協(xié)商民主 依法治國 黨的領(lǐng)導 人民民主

【摘要】：協(xié)商民主作為選舉民主的補充方式,追求民主的真實性和廣泛性,彌補了選舉民主的不足.這一民主范式在中國的民主實踐中不斷發(fā)展,已成為具有中國特色的協(xié)商民主制度和協(xié)商民主規(guī)范。本文分為四個部分。緒論主要從目的、意義兩個方面及協(xié)商民主在國內(nèi)和國外的研究現(xiàn)狀作了概述。全面依法治國是新時期黨治國理政的基本理念,是中國特色社會主義民主發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略舉措,深入研究協(xié)商民主在全面依法治國中的地位和作用,對于深化政治體制改革,推進社會主義民主建設(shè),實現(xiàn)全面建成小康社會的奮斗目標,具有重要的理論意義和實踐意義。研究協(xié)商民主在全面依法治國中的地位,既要借鑒西方法治建設(shè)和協(xié)商民主研究的經(jīng)驗,更要理清中國特色社會主義協(xié)商民主與西方資產(chǎn)階級協(xié)商民主的本質(zhì)區(qū)別。正文第一部分對協(xié)商民主的內(nèi)涵和我國協(xié)商民主制度的建立的演進歷程進行梳理,并分析了我國協(xié)商民主的性質(zhì),我國協(xié)商民主的地位。中國特色社會主義協(xié)商民主的思想和實踐來自于抗日民主根據(jù)地“三三制”的重大創(chuàng)舉,并伴隨中國人民政治協(xié)商會議制度的建立發(fā)展而日益成熟。進入新世紀我們黨總結(jié)社會主義民主建設(shè)的經(jīng)驗,把協(xié)商民主作為一項重要任務(wù),是對中國特色社會主義協(xié)商民主的重大發(fā)展。正文第二部分從依法治國基本方略的提出與內(nèi)涵兩個方面詳細闡述了依法治國的內(nèi)涵和淵源。民主與依法治國的關(guān)系,民主政治是法治社會的基石,依法治國為民主提供保障。正文第三部分深刻論述發(fā)展中國特色社會主義協(xié)商民主必須推動全面依法治國理念和戰(zhàn)略的實施。這就要求在發(fā)展協(xié)商民主中,通過全面依法治國完善協(xié)商民主制度,尤其要堅持黨的領(lǐng)導以引領(lǐng)協(xié)商民主,完善社會主義法治體系以保障協(xié)商民主,弘揚法治精神以發(fā)展協(xié)商民主。
[Abstract]:As a supplementary way of electoral democracy, deliberative democracy pursues the authenticity and universality of democracy, and makes up for the deficiency of electoral democracy. This democratic paradigm has been developing continuously in China's democratic practice. This paper is divided into four parts. The introduction is mainly from the purpose. Two aspects of significance and the status quo of the research on deliberative democracy at home and abroad are summarized. The comprehensive rule of law is the basic concept of the party governing the country in the new period and the strategic measure of the democratic development of socialism with Chinese characteristics. In-depth study of the status and role of consultative democracy in the overall rule of law will help deepen the reform of the political system, promote the construction of socialist democracy, and achieve the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way. It is of great theoretical and practical significance. To study the status of consultative democracy in the overall rule of law, we should learn from the experience of the western countries in the construction of the rule of law and the study of consultative democracy. It is necessary to clarify the essential differences between the socialist consultative democracy with Chinese characteristics and the western bourgeois consultative democracy. The first part of the text is to sort out the connotation of the consultative democracy and the evolution of the establishment of the consultative democracy in China. It also analyzes the nature of our country's consultative democracy, the status of our country's consultative democracy, and the thought and practice of socialist consultative democracy with Chinese characteristics from the major pioneering work of "three three systems" in the anti-Japanese democratic base area. Along with the establishment and development of the Chinese people's political Consultative Conference system, our party has been summing up the experience of socialist democratic construction in the new century and has made the consultative democracy an important task. The second part of the text expounds in detail the connotation and origin of governing the country according to law from the two aspects of the basic strategy of governing the country according to law and the relationship between democracy and the rule of law. Yes. Democracy is the cornerstone of the rule of law society. The third part of the text deeply discusses that the development of socialist consultative democracy with Chinese characteristics must promote the overall implementation of the concept and strategy of governing the country according to law, which requires the development of consultative democracy. Through the comprehensive rule of law to improve the democratic system of consultation, especially adhere to the leadership of the party to lead the consultation democracy, improve the socialist system of rule of law to ensure consultation democracy, promote the spirit of the rule of law in order to develop consultative democracy.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D621.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 孫國華,黃文藝;論社會主義的依法治國[J];中國法學;1998年06期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前4條

1 范會勛;中國社會主義協(xié)商民主問題研究[D];中共中央黨校;2014年

2 張青紅;新中國成立初期協(xié)商民主探索與實踐（1949-1956）[D];華南理工大學;2012年

3 孫存良;當代中國民主協(xié)商研究[D];中國人民大學;2008年

4 馬奔;協(xié)商民主問題研究[D];山東大學;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 孟婧;中國特色社會主義協(xié)商民主研究[D];東北石油大學;2014年

2 盧亮亮;當代中國協(xié)商民主制度化建設(shè)研究[D];吉林大學;2014年

3 王萌;試論社會主義協(xié)商民主的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和完善[D];太原理工大學;2014年

4 郭志婷;中國基層協(xié)商民主研究[D];遼寧大學;2014年

5 黃旭;改革開放以來中國特色協(xié)商民主發(fā)展研究[D];鄭州大學;2014年

6 宋靜;論依法治國的核心是依憲治國[D];山東大學;2010年

7 姚亦亞;西方協(xié)商民主研究[D];四川省社會科學院;2007年

8 譚建陵;法治與依法治國的本質(zhì)及其關(guān)系研究[D];湖南師范大學;2006年

9 張海娟;論我國依法治國的制度建設(shè)[D];東南大學;2005年

10 鄭家為;依法治國若干問題研究[D];大連理工大學;2001年

，

本文編號：1356275