【摘要】：社區(qū)矯正，屬于社區(qū)處遇的內(nèi)容之一，是相對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)的機(jī)構(gòu)式(Institutional Treatment)而言的一種新興的罪犯處遇方式。在中國(guó)大陸地區(qū)它被定義為與監(jiān)獄執(zhí)行刑罰相對(duì)應(yīng)的行刑方式，具體是指國(guó)家專門機(jī)構(gòu)在社會(huì)團(tuán)體、民間組織和社會(huì)志愿者的協(xié)助下，針對(duì)那些由法院決定緩刑、管制、單處剝奪政治權(quán)利或允許假釋的罪犯，以及監(jiān)獄決定監(jiān)外執(zhí)行的罪犯予以矯正的刑罰執(zhí)行活動(dòng)。本文試圖從刑事政策理論和刑罰理論著手，將社區(qū)矯正進(jìn)行重新定位，并根據(jù)社區(qū)矯正目前實(shí)行現(xiàn)狀和條件，，主張重點(diǎn)突出裁判權(quán)啟動(dòng)社區(qū)矯正工作的杠桿作用；克服矯正工作中的強(qiáng)制性公益勞動(dòng)過程中存在的缺陷；理清執(zhí)行主體的權(quán)力層次以整合現(xiàn)有的司法資源和社區(qū)力量，積極擴(kuò)大轉(zhuǎn)處制度的適用。并提出社區(qū)矯正的法律完善，其中包括了我國(guó)青少年司法程序非刑罰化的探索分析。 引言部分概述了社區(qū)矯正的由來、社區(qū)矯正在我國(guó)試點(diǎn)的情況，并由此提出目前存在的若干缺陷與不足。 第一部分，主要闡述社區(qū)矯正的基本理論問題。首先在具體分析現(xiàn)有四種代表性定義的基礎(chǔ)上，將“社區(qū)”界定為由一定數(shù)量的居民組成的、具有內(nèi)在互動(dòng)關(guān)系與文化維系力的地域性生活共同體；“矯正”界定不僅包括行刑，還可包括監(jiān)獄及其他執(zhí)行機(jī)關(guān)的管理與教育活動(dòng)，不再局限通常理解下罪犯的教育改造。其次分析了社區(qū)矯正的理論根基。為了回應(yīng)社會(huì)發(fā)展轉(zhuǎn)型的內(nèi)在需要，刑事政策從國(guó)家本位型轉(zhuǎn)向國(guó)家—社會(huì)雙本位型，社區(qū)作為一種重要力量進(jìn)入國(guó)家公共管理層面勢(shì)在必然，社區(qū)矯正就是一種具體體現(xiàn)。同時(shí)，社區(qū)矯正制度是有效實(shí)現(xiàn)刑罰基本功能的必然要求，蘊(yùn)含刑罰從報(bào)應(yīng)刑到教育刑的理念轉(zhuǎn)變，也是刑罰個(gè)別化原則與罪刑均衡原則、適用刑法人人平等原則互相協(xié)調(diào)的產(chǎn)物。 第二部分，我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正的定位。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有法律框架下，將社區(qū)矯正定位為在社區(qū)內(nèi)進(jìn)行的一種刑罰執(zhí)行方式，大致介紹了現(xiàn)有工作制度體系，并主張將社區(qū)矯正制度化方向予以調(diào)整，試圖重新圈定社區(qū)矯正的適用對(duì)象。 第三部分，社區(qū)矯正實(shí)行現(xiàn)狀和條件。自社區(qū)矯正試點(diǎn)以來，存在著執(zhí)行主體的權(quán)力層次模糊，裁判權(quán)啟動(dòng)意識(shí)不強(qiáng)，強(qiáng)制公益勞動(dòng)的范圍等問題。增強(qiáng)社區(qū)的介入角色意識(shí)、成熟社區(qū)的建設(shè)、矯正工作者隊(duì)伍的培
[Abstract]:Community correction, which belongs to one of the contents of community encounter, is a new way of dealing with criminals compared with the traditional institutional (Institutional Treatment). In mainland China, it is defined as the execution mode corresponding to prison execution, which refers to the punishment enforcement activities of state specialized agencies, with the assistance of social organizations, civil society organizations and social volunteers, for those criminals whose sentences are suspended, controlled, individually deprived of political rights or allowed to be released on parole, as well as those whose sentences are decided by the prison to be carried out outside prison. This paper attempts to reposition community correction from the theory of criminal policy and penalty, and according to the present situation and conditions of community correction, advocates to highlight the leverage of jurisdiction to start community correction, to overcome the defects existing in the process of compulsory public welfare labor in correction work. Clarify the power level of the executive subject in order to integrate the existing judicial resources and community strength, and actively expand the application of the transfer system. It also puts forward the legal perfection of community correction, including the exploration and analysis of the decriminalization of juvenile justice procedure in our country. The introduction summarizes the origin of community correction and the pilot situation of community correction in our country, and puts forward some defects and shortcomings at present. The first part mainly expounds the basic theoretical problems of community correction. First of all, on the basis of analyzing the existing four representative definitions, the "community" is defined as a regional life community composed of a certain number of residents with internal interaction and cultural maintenance, and the definition of "correction" can include not only execution, but also the management and educational activities of prison and other executive organs, which is no longer limited to the educational transformation of criminals under the usual understanding. Secondly, it analyzes the theoretical foundation of community correction. In order to respond to the inherent needs of social development and transformation, the criminal policy has changed from the national standard to the state-society double standard. As an important force, it is inevitable for the community to enter the national public management level, and community correction is a concrete embodiment. At the same time, the community correction system is the inevitable requirement to effectively realize the basic function of penalty, which contains the transformation of penalty from retributive punishment to educational punishment, and is also the product of coordination between the principle of individualization of penalty and the principle of balance between crime and punishment, and the principle of equality between everyone in applicable criminal law. The second part is the orientation of community correction in our country. Under the existing legal framework of our country, community correction is defined as a kind of penalty execution mode in the community, the existing working system is briefly introduced, and the institutionalized direction of community correction is adjusted in an attempt to redefine the applicable object of community correction. The third part, the implementation of community correction status and conditions. Since the pilot of community correction, there have been some problems, such as vague power level of executive subject, weak consciousness of starting jurisdiction, scope of compulsory public welfare labor and so on. Strengthen the awareness of the intervention role of the community, the construction of the mature community, and the cultivation of the correctional workers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D926.8

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 葛磊;刑事制裁體系近現(xiàn)代史綱[D];北京大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳國(guó)棟;刑罰執(zhí)行中的社區(qū)矯正制度[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 李彬彬;我國(guó)社區(qū)處遇的多維解構(gòu)與探索[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2009年

本文編號(hào)：2504776