本文選題：農(nóng)業(yè) + 司法鑒定　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定做為司法鑒定的一類向來被人們忽視,對它的研究幾乎是一片空白。理論的滯后必然導(dǎo)致現(xiàn)實(shí)的隨意和盲目。在司法實(shí)踐中,由于農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的法律體系尚未形成,又缺乏統(tǒng)一的農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、技術(shù)規(guī)范,再加上農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的管理不到位,導(dǎo)致各種冤假錯案層出不窮,農(nóng)民的合法權(quán)益得不到應(yīng)有的保護(hù)。在農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定程序中:一、在鑒定受理方面,鑒定主體不合法,超范圍受理鑒定等問題突出。二、在鑒定的過程中,鑒定的方法、步驟、參照的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、鑒定的時限等無統(tǒng)一規(guī)定和規(guī)范,隨意性大。三、在鑒定的管轄方面,多頭鑒定,重復(fù)鑒定現(xiàn)象普遍。筆者曾在新疆一基層農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)部門從事了十年的農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定工作,親自主持了100多起農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定,有感于農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的混亂,參照2005年2月28日通過的《全國人民代表大會常務(wù)委員會關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》,2005年9月30日公布施行的《司法鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)登記管理辦法》、《司法鑒定人登記管理辦法》,結(jié)合自己親身經(jīng)歷的案例,分析了當(dāng)今農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定管理及程序制度的缺陷,并從以下幾個方面提出了自己的完善建議和初步設(shè)想:一、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的管轄。二、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的委托和受理。三、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的法律援助制度。四、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的實(shí)施。它包括:1、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的方案:2、檢材的采取和保存;3、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn);4、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的紀(jì)錄和復(fù)核;5、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的質(zhì)量控制;6、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的時限;7、農(nóng)業(yè)司法的補(bǔ)充鑒定、重新鑒定;8、設(shè)立農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定調(diào)解制度;9、建立農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定宣誓制度;10、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定的中止、終結(jié)。五、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定文書的出具。六、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定資料的歸檔。七、農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定人的出庭作證。八、建立農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定輔助人制度。建立完善適合我國國情的農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定體系有許多問題有待解決,進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)對它的研究和論證是學(xué)者和有關(guān)專家義不容辭的責(zé)任,筆者呼吁有關(guān)部門給予農(nóng)業(yè)司法鑒定體系建設(shè)應(yīng)有的重視,加大資金投入,群策群力,努力遏止坑農(nóng)害農(nóng)事件的發(fā)生,使八億農(nóng)民這一弱勢群體的合法權(quán)益得到應(yīng)有的保障。
[Abstract]:As a kind of judicial expertise, agricultural judicial expertise has always been ignored, and the research on it is almost a blank. The lag of theory will inevitably lead to random and blind reality. In judicial practice, the legal system of agricultural judicial expertise has not yet been formed, and there is a lack of unified technical standards and technical norms of agricultural judicial expertise, and the management of agricultural judicial expertise institutions is not in place. As a result of various cases of false and false, farmers' legitimate rights and interests can not be protected. In the process of agricultural judicial identification, firstly, in the aspect of accepting appraisal, the subject of appraisal is illegal, and the problem of accepting appraisal beyond scope is prominent. Second, in the process of appraisal, the methods, steps, standards of reference and time limit of appraisal are not uniform and standard, so they are arbitrary. Third, in the jurisdiction of identification, the phenomenon of multiple identification and repeated identification is common. The author has worked in a grass-roots agricultural technology department in Xinjiang for ten years in the field of agricultural judicial identification, personally presided over more than 100 agricultural judicial appraisals, feeling the confusion of agricultural judicial expertise. Referring to the decision of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on the Administration of Judicial expertise, adopted on 28 February 2005, the measures for the Administration of Registration of Forensic expertise institutions promulgated on September 30, 2005, and the Registration of Judicial experts Management methods >, combined with their own experience of the case, This paper analyzes the defects of the current management and procedure system of agricultural judicial expertise, and puts forward its own suggestions and tentative ideas from the following aspects: first, the jurisdiction of agricultural judicial expertise. Second, the entrustment and acceptance of agricultural judicial expertise. Third, the legal aid system of agricultural judicial expertise. Fourth, the implementation of agricultural forensic expertise. It includes: 1, the scheme of agricultural judicial expertise: 2, the adoption and preservation of agricultural materials, the technical standard for agricultural judicial identification, the record and review of agricultural judicial expertise, the quality control of agricultural judicial expertise, and the time limit for agricultural judicial identification, Supplementary Appraisal of Agricultural Justice, Reappraising 8, establishing the agricultural judicial appraisal mediation system, establishing the agricultural judicial appraisal oath system 10, the suspension of the agricultural judicial expertise, the end. Fifth, the issuance of agricultural forensic documents. 6. Archiving of agricultural forensic data. Seventh, the agricultural judicial expert testifies in court. Eighth, establish the agricultural judicial appraisal assistant person system. There are many problems to be solved in establishing and perfecting the agricultural judicial identification system suitable for the national conditions of our country. It is incumbent upon scholars and relevant experts to further strengthen their research and demonstration. The author appeals to the relevant departments to pay due attention to the construction of the agricultural judicial identification system, increase the investment of funds, and make concerted efforts to curb the occurrence of the pit farming and harm to agriculture, so as to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of 800 million peasants as a vulnerable group.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D918.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 徐昕;專家證據(jù)的擴(kuò)張與限制[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年06期

2 張玉鑲;司法鑒定學(xué)基本概念研究[J];中國司法鑒定;2001年01期

3 孫秉晨;建立科學(xué)規(guī)范的司法鑒定管理體制勢在必行[J];中國司法鑒定;2001年02期

，

本文編號：2113046