本文選題：多頭鑒定 + 重復(fù)鑒定　； 參考：《四川大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】： 由于我國(guó)鑒定體制及立法的不足，在當(dāng)前鑒定體制弊端諸現(xiàn)的情況下，多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定、鑒定分歧問題日益突出，重新鑒定沒有發(fā)揮其在司法實(shí)踐中應(yīng)有的功能，當(dāng)事人對(duì)司法鑒定結(jié)論產(chǎn)生懷疑，損害司法的公信力，同時(shí)嚴(yán)重影響法官對(duì)司法鑒定結(jié)論的審查和采信，導(dǎo)致判決結(jié)果的不公正，致使案件久拖不決，影響訴訟效率的實(shí)現(xiàn)，也不利于司法改革的深化。在實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正，提高司法效率思想理念指導(dǎo)下，，本文從多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定、鑒定分歧的積極意義和面臨的問題出發(fā)，初步分析了我國(guó)司法鑒定體制中鑒定人、鑒定啟動(dòng)機(jī)制、鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、鑒定程序、鑒定的質(zhì)證制度等幾方面存在的問題，從司法鑒定的概念、性質(zhì)、特點(diǎn)入手，提出了多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定、鑒定分歧的原因有；鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)和鑒定人、啟動(dòng)主體、委托主體、鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、質(zhì)證制度、違法鑒定責(zé)任追究制度等方面的原因。從改革現(xiàn)行鑒定體制出發(fā)，試探性地提出了自己一些不成熟的改革意見，從理性構(gòu)建適合我國(guó)的司法鑒定制度的角度，力求探討減少、消除、解決“多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定、鑒定分歧”問題之策略。主要從建立完善司法鑒定人資格認(rèn)證、規(guī)范鑒定啟動(dòng)程序和委托程序、對(duì)鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)和鑒定人行使監(jiān)督和管理、完善司法鑒定質(zhì)證制度、建全違法鑒定責(zé)任追究制度、統(tǒng)一和完善鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等七個(gè)方面提出了改革建議和觀點(diǎn)，以提高司法鑒定的質(zhì)量，減少多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定和鑒定分歧的產(chǎn)生，促進(jìn)司法公正和效率。
[Abstract]:Because of the deficiency of the appraisal system and legislation in our country, under the condition of the malpractice of the current appraisal system, the problems of multiple appraisal, repeated appraisal and appraisal divergence are becoming more and more prominent, and the reappraisal does not play its due function in the judicial practice. The parties doubt the conclusion of judicial expertise, damage the credibility of the judiciary, at the same time seriously affect the judge's examination and acceptance of the conclusion of judicial expertise, lead to the unjust outcome of the judgment, cause the case to procrastinate, affect the realization of the efficiency of litigation. Also not conducive to the deepening of judicial reform. Under the guidance of the idea of realizing judicial justice and improving judicial efficiency, this paper analyzes the connoisseur in the judicial appraisal system of our country, starting from the positive significance and problems of multi-head identification, repeated identification and appraisal differences. The problems existing in the mechanism, standard, procedure and system of cross-examination of identification are discussed in this paper. Starting with the concept, nature and characteristics of judicial identification, the author puts forward the reasons for the differences between multiple identification, repeated identification and identification. The reasons of identification institution and appraiser, starting subject, entrusting subject, appraising standard, cross-examination system, investigating system of illegal appraisal liability, etc. Starting from the reform of the current appraisal system, this paper tentatively puts forward some immature reform opinions, and from the angle of rationally constructing the judicial appraisal system suitable for our country, tries to explore the reduction, elimination and solution of "long appraisal and repeated identification". Strategies for identifying divisive issues. It mainly includes establishing and perfecting the qualification certification of judicial experts, standardizing the procedures for initiating and entrusting identification, exercising supervision and management over appraisal institutions and experts, perfecting the system of cross-examination of judicial identification, and establishing a complete system for investigating the liability for illegal identification. In order to improve the quality of judicial expertise, reduce the emergence of multiple identification, repeat identification and identify differences, and promote judicial justice and efficiency, this paper puts forward reform suggestions and viewpoints in seven aspects, such as unifying and perfecting the standard of identification.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D926;D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 龍躍;刑事訴訟中的多頭鑒定、重復(fù)鑒定問題研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

2 余淑英;“多頭鑒定”“重復(fù)鑒定”問題之淺析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2036675