本文選題：人際交往 + 團體心理咨詢�。� 參考：《華東師范大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 目前國內(nèi)監(jiān)獄日益重視罪犯的心理健康問題，很多都建立了犯人的心理健康檔案，并開始使用心理矯治的手段來幫助罪犯更快地適應監(jiān)獄生活，更好地進行勞動改造。雖然這些實踐工作已經(jīng)在各地普遍開展，但往往缺乏理論基礎的支持與理論上的深入研究。鑒于此，本研究通過對男性成年犯人際交往問題的調(diào)查和分析，設計團體訓練方案并進行團體干預，以提高男性成年犯的人際交往能力，減少人際沖突，改善人際關(guān)系。在此基礎上，建立一套專門的心理矯治模式，從而為今后罪犯人際交往方面的心理矯治工作提供理論依據(jù)。 本研究改編了《人際關(guān)系行為困擾診斷量表》，通過因素分析得到包括人際沖突、攻擊性、拘謹性、封閉性、自卑感和緘默性等六個因子，自編了《人際交往阻礙因素問卷》，通過因素分析得出怯懦、清高、孤僻、自我中心和敏感易怒等五個因子，兩份問卷均有較高的信效度。研究隨機抽取125名罪犯，通過了解人際交往的情況，以及結(jié)合各量表上的結(jié)果，設計了具有針對性的團體訓練方案。 本研究的被試共分為兩個組：干預組和對照組。對干預組8名成員進行了為期10次、持續(xù)三個月的人際交往團體訓練，對照組8名成員不做任何處理。團體訓練結(jié)束后兩個月，對兩個組進行了回訪。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：在人際交往行為困擾診斷量表上，兩組在總分上和自卑感因子上存在顯著性差異，干預組的改善情況明顯優(yōu)于對照組；干預組前后測有極其顯著性差異，，經(jīng)過團體訓練干預組成員的人際關(guān)系困擾問題明顯減少，拘謹性和緘默性兩個因子上的得分下降明顯，差異達到顯著性水平。在人際交往阻礙因素問卷上，兩組在總分上有顯著性差異，干預組的人際交往阻礙因素有一定的減輕，但各個因子上無差異；干預組的前后測在總分上有極其顯著性差異，團體訓練后情況得到明顯改善，在怯懦和敏感易怒因子上差異也達到顯著。干預組成員的自我報告說明成員在人際交往方面，能力得到提高，人際關(guān)系有改善；對自己的評價更高，更加悅納自我。 本研究表明： 1、罪犯的人際關(guān)系行為困擾問題通過針對性的團體訓練是可以加以改善的，交往中的阻礙因素也是可以減輕的。 2、在監(jiān)獄環(huán)境中，運用本研究中的團體訓練方案來改善罪犯的人際關(guān)系和提高人際交往能力具有一定的可行性和有效性，但是在方案設計中需要注意針對監(jiān)獄和在押罪犯的具體情況。
[Abstract]:At present, domestic prisons pay more and more attention to the mental health of criminals, many of them have established mental health files of prisoners, and began to use psychological correction to help criminals adapt to prison life more quickly and carry out better re-education through labour. Although these practices have been widely carried out all over the world, they often lack the support of theoretical basis and theoretical in-depth research. In view of this, through the investigation and analysis of the interpersonal communication problems of male adult offenders, this study designed a group training program and carried out group intervention in order to improve the interpersonal ability of male adult offenders, reduce interpersonal conflicts and improve interpersonal relationships. On this basis, a set of special psychological correction model, In order to provide a theoretical basis for the psychological correction of criminals' interpersonal communication in the future, this study adapted the "Diagnostic scale for interpersonal relationship behavior disturbance", and through factor analysis, we got the following conclusions: interpersonal conflict, aggression, restraint, closeness, interpersonal conflict, aggression, restraint and closeness. Six factors, such as inferiority complex and mutism, were compiled by the author. Through factor analysis, five factors of cowardice, high level, isolation, self-centeredness and sensitive irritability were obtained. Both questionnaires had high reliability and validity. In this study, 125 criminals were randomly selected, and a group training program was designed according to the results of each scale. The subjects were divided into two groups: the intervention group and the control group. Eight members of the intervention group were trained in interpersonal group for 10 times for three months, while 8 members in the control group were not treated. Two months after the group training, the two groups were visited back. The results showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in the total score and the inferiority factor, the improvement of the intervention group was better than that of the control group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups before and after the intervention. After group training, the interpersonal problems of the members of the intervention group decreased significantly, and the scores of the two factors of formality and mutism decreased significantly, and the difference reached a significant level. There was significant difference in the total score between the two groups in the questionnaire of interpersonal communication hindrance factors, but there was no difference in each factor in the intervention group, and there was a significant difference in the total score between the two groups before and after the intervention group. After group training, the condition improved obviously, and the difference in cowardice and sensitive irritability factor was also significant. The self-report of the members of the intervention group showed that their interpersonal skills had improved, their interpersonal relationships had improved, and their evaluation of themselves was higher. This study shows that: 1, the interpersonal relationship behavior problems of criminals can be improved through targeted group training, and the obstacles in communication can be alleviated. 2, in the prison environment, It is feasible and effective to use the group training program in this study to improve the interpersonal relationship and interpersonal ability of criminals, but in the design of the scheme, we should pay attention to the specific situation of prison and prisoners.
【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D917.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉柳;;中國監(jiān)獄制度的實施效果和改革方向[J];國家行政學院學報;2013年02期

2 何燕平;;團體心理干預服刑人員監(jiān)獄化人格的效果[J];漳州師范學院學報(自然科學版);2013年02期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 梅峰;臨床心理學視野下的新入監(jiān)服刑人員心理評估及干預策略研究[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 何燕平;服刑人員監(jiān)獄化人格問卷的編制及其團體干預效果研究[D];漳州師范學院;2010年

2 曹佳佳;服刑人員童年創(chuàng)傷經(jīng)歷與成人依戀、自尊的關(guān)系及其團體干預研究[D];漳州師范學院;2012年

本文編號：1998629