本文選題：刑罰執(zhí)行 + 社區(qū)矯正　； 參考：《南京師范大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 社區(qū)矯正作為刑罰執(zhí)行中的外來事物，正在中國經(jīng)歷鑒別、認同、調(diào)適及整合的過程。為了社區(qū)矯正能夠真正融入到中國法制體系之中，筆者試圖通過對社區(qū)矯正在中國城市社區(qū)的實施過程中所遭遇的幾個問題展開分析：在理論層面上，歸納出社區(qū)和社區(qū)矯正法律意義上的概念、特征和理論基礎；針對社區(qū)矯正主體、社區(qū)矯正對象以及社區(qū)矯正法律適用問題，不單單對問題表象進行詳略得當?shù)拿枋觯�揭露出深層原因所在，并進一步提出略顯粗陋的解決思路；值得一提的是本文還單列一章，從微觀對在社區(qū)矯正中的未成年犯這個特殊群體的概念和特殊性問題進行探索，，以便于公眾有一個新的視角來考量未成年人犯罪的問題。 在分析的基礎上，筆者明確了法律意義上的城市社區(qū)適用范圍，總結(jié)出社區(qū)矯正的基本特征是刑事懲罰性、制裁緩和性、非監(jiān)禁性和社區(qū)居民參與性，認為社區(qū)矯正的理論基礎除了刑罰標簽理論、刑罰人道化理論、復歸社會理論、刑罰謙抑理論外，還創(chuàng)造性地將社會學中的社會排斥理論納入社區(qū)矯正的理論基礎體系，創(chuàng)造性提出了自我矯正者也是社區(qū)矯正的主體之一。在對社區(qū)矯正主體問題的分析時，強化了司法行政機關的權力和職責，并指出社區(qū)矯正工作并非只需要具有法律知識的人員。在對社區(qū)矯正對象問題進行分析時，引入了權利保障機制，并提出了相應的評估指標體系和權利救濟程序。針對社區(qū)矯正法律適用的效力沖突問題，以法律淵源的研究為出發(fā)點，找到了一條有限度加快立法進程的康莊大道。在對“未成年犯”和“青少年罪犯”的比較分析中，認為“未成年犯”更能從法律方面說明問題，從而將“未成年犯”的概念引入社區(qū)矯正體系，接著力圖對“未成年犯”不同于“成年犯”的特殊性(生理與心理斷層性、動機簡單易變性、行為模仿攀比性、作案集團專業(yè)性)進行剖析，進而提出社區(qū)管理、家庭參與以及心理矯正等有益于“未成年犯”社區(qū)矯正的特殊措施。
[Abstract]:Community correction, as a foreign thing in penalty enforcement, is undergoing the process of identification, adjustment and integration in China. In order to truly integrate community correction into the legal system of China, the author tries to analyze several problems encountered in the implementation of community correction in Chinese urban communities: on the theoretical level, The concept, characteristics and theoretical basis of community and community correction in legal sense are summarized, and the problem representation is not only described in detail, but also in terms of the subject of community correction, the object of community correction and the application of community correction law. It also reveals the deep causes, and further puts forward a slightly crude solution. It is worth mentioning that this paper also includes a separate chapter to explore the concept and particularity of this special group of juvenile offenders in community correction. In order to facilitate the public to have a new perspective to consider the problem of juvenile delinquency. On the basis of the analysis, the author clarifies the scope of urban community application in the sense of law, and concludes that the basic characteristics of community correction are criminal punishment, sanctions mitigation, non-imprisonment and community residents' participation. Besides the theory of penalty label, the theory of humanization of penalty, the theory of returning to society and the theory of penalty suppression, the theoretical basis of community correction is to creatively incorporate the social exclusion theory in sociology into the theoretical foundation system of community correction. Creatively put forward that self-correction is also one of the subjects of community correction. In the analysis of the subject of community correction, it strengthens the power and responsibility of the judicial administrative organ, and points out that the community correction work does not only need the person with legal knowledge. When analyzing the object of community correction, the mechanism of right protection is introduced, and the corresponding evaluation index system and right relief procedure are put forward. In view of the conflict of the validity of the application of community correction law, this paper, based on the study of the sources of law, finds a road to speed up the legislative process in a limited way. In the comparative analysis of "juvenile delinquents" and "juvenile delinquents", it is considered that "juvenile delinquents" can better explain the problems from the legal aspect, thus introducing the concept of "juvenile delinquents" into the community correction system. Then it tries to analyze the particularity of "juvenile delinquents", which is different from "adult criminals" (physiological and psychological fault, simple and changeable motive, imitation and comparison of behavior, professional crime group), and then puts forward community management. Family participation and psychological correction are helpful for community correction of juvenile delinquents.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D926.8

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳玉華;社區(qū)矯正工作初探[J];法學雜志;2003年05期

2 陳興良;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策研究[J];法學雜志;2006年01期

3 陳興良;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策研究[J];法學雜志;2006年02期

4 鄔慶祥,胡靜雅,林小培;未成年刑釋人員重新違法犯罪影響因素的研究[J];青少年犯罪問題;2003年03期

5 林小培;李耀明;;城市邊緣青少年的犯罪預防[J];青少年犯罪問題;2006年03期

6 儲槐植,張立宇;青少年犯罪現(xiàn)狀與治理對策[J];江蘇公安�？茖W校學報;2001年06期

7 陳興良;刑事法治視野中的刑事政策[J];江蘇社會科學;2004年05期

8 榮道福;社區(qū)矯正之價值探討[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2005年06期

9 韋寶平;論鄧小平關于嚴厲打擊刑事、經(jīng)濟犯罪和懲治腐敗的思想[J];求實;2001年S1期

10 劉強;上海社區(qū)矯正的發(fā)展與評價[J];法治論叢;2002年06期

本文編號：1943366