本文選題：侵犯知識產(chǎn)權犯罪 + 追訴乏力�。� 參考：《湘潭大學》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟全球化的快步推進,國際交往的日益密切,知識經(jīng)濟時代的霍然來臨,知識產(chǎn)權的重要性無可爭議地凸現(xiàn)出來。保護知識產(chǎn)權已經(jīng)成為提高國家競爭力的重要內(nèi)容,成為當今世界的潮流。 我國對于知識產(chǎn)權的保護,包括司法保護與行政保護兩種方式。但就現(xiàn)狀而言,我國對知識產(chǎn)權的保護卻未達到應有的高度,尤其是對知識產(chǎn)權的刑事保護明顯缺乏力度,實踐中普遍存在知識產(chǎn)權行政保護強于刑事保護的情況,很多應當構成知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的行為沒有依法受到追訴。這與現(xiàn)實領域發(fā)生的大量知識產(chǎn)權違法案件,以及知識產(chǎn)權對于社會經(jīng)濟的貢獻相比而言,是極不相稱的。其一大后果就是知識產(chǎn)權違法行為愈演愈烈,嚴重侵害了知識產(chǎn)權所有人的合法利益。知識產(chǎn)權保護不力甚至已經(jīng)成為我國融入世界經(jīng)濟潮流的一大羈絆。究其原因,主要有二:一方面,某些知識產(chǎn)權行政管理機關對于應當構成犯罪的知識產(chǎn)權違法行為沒有依法進行移送,“以罰代刑”情況嚴重。另一方面,有關司法機關對于知識產(chǎn)權犯罪偏好降格處理,能判不判,重罪輕判。其深層次的原因與知識產(chǎn)權行政執(zhí)法機關的財政缺乏保障、有關部門的監(jiān)督不力、立法體系的疏漏、知識產(chǎn)權刑事保護的意識薄弱因素等密切相關。 因此,要從根本上解決侵犯知識產(chǎn)權犯罪刑事追訴乏力這一問題,就要更新觀念,重視對知識產(chǎn)權的刑事保護,堅決打擊行政執(zhí)法機關的“以罰代刑”等不法行為,對構成知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的行為應依法予以追究。只有這樣,才能最大程度地打擊知識產(chǎn)權犯罪人的囂張氣焰,從而更好地保護知識產(chǎn)權所有人的利益,為建設創(chuàng)新型國家貢獻應有的力量。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization and the increasingly close international contacts, the importance of intellectual property rights has emerged indisputably in the coming era of knowledge economy. The protection of intellectual property rights has become an important part of improving national competitiveness and the trend of the world today. The protection of intellectual property in our country includes judicial protection and administrative protection. However, as far as the present situation is concerned, the protection of intellectual property in our country has not reached its due height, especially the criminal protection of intellectual property is obviously lacking in strength. In practice, the administrative protection of intellectual property is generally stronger than that of criminal protection. Many acts that should constitute intellectual property crimes have not been prosecuted according to law. This is not commensurate with the large number of intellectual property violation cases and the contribution of intellectual property rights to social economy. One of its major consequences is that intellectual property rights violations become more and more serious, which seriously infringes the legitimate interests of intellectual property owners. Weak protection of intellectual property rights has even become a major fetters of China's integration into the world economic trend. There are two main reasons: on the one hand, some intellectual property administrative organs have not transferred the intellectual property illegal acts which should constitute a crime according to the law, and the situation of "substitute punishment with punishment" is serious. On the other hand, the judicial authorities tend to reduce their preference for intellectual property crimes, and can sentence no or felony. The deep reasons are closely related to the lack of financial protection of the administrative law enforcement agencies of intellectual property rights, the weak supervision of relevant departments, the omission of the legislative system, the weak awareness of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, and so on. Therefore, in order to fundamentally solve the problem of weak criminal prosecution for crimes against intellectual property rights, it is necessary to renew the concept, attach importance to the criminal protection of intellectual property rights, and resolutely crack down on illegal acts such as "punishment instead of punishment" by administrative law enforcement agencies. Any act constituting an intellectual property crime shall be investigated according to law. Only in this way can we strike at the arrogance of intellectual property offenders to the greatest extent, thus better protect the interests of intellectual property owners and contribute to the building of an innovative country.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D917;D924.3

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 蒲江濤;;論民事訴訟中的調(diào)解與地方保護主義[J];理論導報;2010年10期

，

本文編號：1886428