發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-14 09:39

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 群體性事件 基層公安機(jī)關(guān) 角色 困境　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展和社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型的緊迫壓力,我國(guó)的人民內(nèi)部矛盾正不斷加劇,因此引發(fā)的群體性事件數(shù)量不斷增加,而群體性事件所具有的“觸點(diǎn)”多,“燃點(diǎn)”低的特性,使得預(yù)防和處置群體性事件的工作難度大大增加。公安機(jī)關(guān)這個(gè)肩負(fù)著維護(hù)國(guó)家安全和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定重任的隊(duì)伍,就成為參與處置群體性事件必不可少的中堅(jiān)力量,因此,從公安機(jī)關(guān)的角度對(duì)群體性事件進(jìn)行研究具有十分重要的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文第一章首先提出了研究的問(wèn)題是群體性事件處置中基層公安機(jī)關(guān)的角色、困境與出路,闡述了研究的意義,并對(duì)群體性事件的研究現(xiàn)狀、內(nèi)涵、成因和特性等相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行了概述。 第二章,對(duì)基層公安機(jī)關(guān)在處置群體性事件當(dāng)中所扮演的角色進(jìn)行了分析。目前,我國(guó)基層公安機(jī)關(guān)在處置群體性事件的過(guò)程中所扮演的角色具有法律和現(xiàn)實(shí)雙重屬性,一方面法律法規(guī)對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)在群體事件處置中的任務(wù)有所規(guī)定,另一方面,公安機(jī)關(guān)又要接受當(dāng)?shù)卣念I(lǐng)導(dǎo),而當(dāng)?shù)卣鲇谧陨碚?jī)、利益等因素的考慮,容易違法違規(guī)使用警力,使得基層公安機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)常處于角色錯(cuò)位的境地。為此,筆者認(rèn)為在群體性事件處置過(guò)程中基層公安機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持黨的統(tǒng)一領(lǐng)導(dǎo),同時(shí)依法行使自身職權(quán),當(dāng)好黨的參謀和助手。 第三章,對(duì)基層公安機(jī)關(guān)在處置群體性事件過(guò)程中遇到的困境進(jìn)行了分析。宏觀(guān)層面,現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)法律對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)處置群體性事件的立法不夠完善,與處置程序和措施相關(guān)的法規(guī)不夠健全；隨著警力被大肆濫用,造成警察權(quán)威和公信力的不斷降低,嚴(yán)重影響了干群關(guān)系和警民關(guān)系。微觀(guān)層面,一是基層公安機(jī)關(guān)處置群體性事件的預(yù)警、協(xié)調(diào)、現(xiàn)場(chǎng)處置等機(jī)制不健全,二是新時(shí)期公安機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)現(xiàn)代媒體輿論缺乏有效控制,三是公安機(jī)關(guān)自身的因素,包括人員素質(zhì)、責(zé)任意識(shí)和裝備保障等。 第四章,對(duì)群體性事件處置中基層公安機(jī)關(guān)的出路進(jìn)行了分析。從法律制度、處置機(jī)制、警察權(quán)威、角色定位、輿論控制、隊(duì)伍建設(shè)等方面提出了改善措施。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our country's economy and the pressing pressure of social transformation, the contradictions among the people in our country are becoming more and more serious, and the number of mass incidents has been increasing. The fact that mass incidents have more "contact points" and "low ignition" makes it much more difficult to prevent and deal with group incidents. The public security organs, which shoulder the heavy responsibility of maintaining national security and social stability, Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study group incidents from the perspective of public security organs. In the first chapter, the author puts forward the problem of the role, predicament and outlet of the public security organs at the grass-roots level in the management of mass incidents, and expounds the significance of the research, and the present situation and connotation of the research on the group incidents. The causes and characteristics of the related theories are summarized. The second chapter analyzes the role played by grass-roots public security organs in dealing with mass incidents. At present, the role played by grass-roots public security organs in dealing with mass incidents has dual attributes of law and reality. On the one hand, laws and regulations provide for the tasks of the public security organs in dealing with group incidents. On the other hand, the public security organs have to accept the leadership of the local government, which takes into account factors such as their own achievements and interests. It is easy to use the police force illegally and illegally, which makes the basic public security organs often be in the position of misplacing their roles. Therefore, the author thinks that in the process of handling mass incidents, the grass-roots public security organs should adhere to the unified leadership of the Party and exercise their functions and powers in accordance with the law. Be a good adviser and assistant to the Party. The third chapter analyzes the difficulties encountered by the grass-roots public security organs in the process of dealing with mass incidents. At the macro level, the legislation on the handling of mass incidents by the public security organs in our country is not perfect at the present stage. Laws and regulations relating to procedures and measures are inadequate; as the police force is abused, the authority and credibility of the police continue to decline, seriously affecting the relationship between the cadres and the masses and the relationship between the police and the community... at the micro level, First, the mechanism for the grass-roots public security organs to deal with mass incidents is not perfect. Second, the public security organs lack effective control over modern media public opinion in the new period. The third is the factors of the public security organs themselves, including the quality of personnel. Sense of responsibility and equipment support. In Chapter 4th, the author analyzes the way out of the grass-roots public security organs in the handling of mass incidents, and puts forward some improvement measures from the aspects of legal system, disposal mechanism, police authority, role orientation, public opinion control and team building.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D631.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 梁甲林;基層公安機(jī)關(guān)處置拆遷類(lèi)群體性事件的策略研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

2 洪瑋;依法治國(guó)框架下的揚(yáng)州市公安機(jī)關(guān)社會(huì)治理角色研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2015年

3 牛子豪;警務(wù)督察體制研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1510407