本文選題：人性 + 道德�。� 參考：《湖湘論壇》2017年06期

【摘要】：人性是道德的最終根據(jù),中西方倫理學史中的不同學派都從各自的人性理論出發(fā)論證自身倫理學及其基本道德原則的"道德性"或"合理性",規(guī)定道德的可能性。盡管如此,但是,只有從人性的復雜性出發(fā)才能正確說明道德的可能性。我們應該分別從邏輯的角度和現(xiàn)實的角度來說明人性的復雜性和道德的可能性之間的關系,為倫理學通過設計而使人性向善提供理論支持。人性的復雜性和道德的可能性的分析對于提升我國道德建設水平至少有兩個重要啟示:其一,堅持人是有限的道德人,并以此為基礎把道德建設置于可操作的現(xiàn)實之上;其二,在做好三個方面的工作的基礎上重點提升違背道德的成本從而防止某些地方或某些方面道德領域中的"劣幣驅逐良幣"的現(xiàn)象。
[Abstract]:Human nature is the ultimate basis of morality. Different schools in the history of ethics in China and the West have demonstrated their own ethics and their basic moral principles of "morality" or "rationality" from their own theories of human nature, and stipulated the possibility of morality. Nevertheless, moral possibilities can only be correctly illustrated by the complexity of human nature. We should explain the relationship between the complexity of human nature and the possibility of morality from the angle of logic and reality, so as to provide theoretical support for ethics to make human nature become good through design. The analysis of the complexity of human nature and the possibility of morality has at least two important revelations to improve the level of moral construction in our country: first, to insist that man is a limited moral person, and on this basis to put moral construction above the operational reality; second, On the basis of doing a good job in three aspects, the emphasis is on raising the cost of moral violation so as to prevent the phenomenon of "Bad money drives out good" in some places or in certain aspects of moral field.
【作者單位】： 湖北大學;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金后期項目“西方哲學普遍性的淪落”(項目編號:15X009)
【分類號】：B82-061
，

本文編號：1890721