【摘要】：五四運動后的中國,具有初步共產(chǎn)主義思想的知識分子開始以馬克思主義為指導(dǎo)思想探索中國革命,并與共產(chǎn)國際建立了密切聯(lián)系。共產(chǎn)國際成為中國革命進(jìn)程中不可忽視的重要因素。1920年,是共產(chǎn)國際與中國革命建立革命聯(lián)系的開端。在中國錯綜復(fù)雜的革命形勢下,這種聯(lián)系主要表現(xiàn)在共產(chǎn)國際和蘇俄(1922年后為蘇聯(lián))政府通過派遣代表來華,幫助成立中國共產(chǎn)黨并制定理論策略,直接參與國共合作的革命統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線的建立等大量活動,實現(xiàn)對中國革命的幫助和指導(dǎo)。從1920年到1927年國民革命的失敗,其間來華時間最長者當(dāng)屬鮑羅廷與維經(jīng)斯基。共產(chǎn)國際與中國革命關(guān)系的相關(guān)課題研究中,學(xué)術(shù)界對共產(chǎn)國際駐華代表的研究著述頗豐,對鮑羅廷和維經(jīng)斯基的針對研究數(shù)量亦相當(dāng)可觀,但卻未有關(guān)于二者的比較研究。因此,文章將以《共產(chǎn)國際、聯(lián)共(布)與中國革命檔案資料叢書》等文獻(xiàn)材料為基礎(chǔ),在學(xué)習(xí)和了解相關(guān)研究成果的前提下,對鮑羅廷與維經(jīng)斯基對中國革命問題思想觀點做一比較,以期從此特定角度為豐富和深化共產(chǎn)國際與中國革命研究奉獻(xiàn)綿薄之力。本文之所以圍繞鮑羅廷和維經(jīng)斯基這兩位代表進(jìn)行比較研究,一是因為他們駐華時間長,駐華期間基本經(jīng)歷了中國大革命這一特殊且重大的歷史時期,提出了許多有關(guān)中國革命基本問題的思想觀點;二是由于二人特殊的身份,使得他們的思想行為與共產(chǎn)國際、蘇聯(lián)政府有密不可分的關(guān)系,值得深究。本文以1920年至1927年鮑羅廷和維經(jīng)斯基對中國革命基本問題的理論和實踐為研究對象,分析他們在中國革命領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)、國共合作統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線、土地革命、武裝斗爭等問題的思想觀點,辨析和梳理其中的異同,并在自己很有限的認(rèn)識和研究水平的基礎(chǔ)上,盡可能做出客觀公正的判斷和評價。本文在結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計上,也大體按上述有關(guān)中國革命的幾個基本問題依次安排。做此比較研究的目的與學(xué)術(shù)價值,在于加深理解共產(chǎn)國際與中國革命的密切關(guān)系,從而深化認(rèn)識中國共產(chǎn)黨把握中國革命規(guī)律的歷史過程,從一個側(cè)面考查馬克思主義中國化的歷史軌跡,加深對馬克思主義基本原理同中國具體實際相結(jié)合的過程的了解和感悟。
[Abstract]:After the May 4th Movement, intellectuals with initial communist ideology began to explore the Chinese revolution with Marxism as the guiding ideology, and established close ties with the Communist International. Comintern became an important factor in the process of Chinese revolution. In 1920, it was the beginning of the establishment of revolutionary relationship between Comintern and Chinese revolution. Under the complicated revolutionary situation in China, this connection was mainly manifested in the Communist International and the Soviet Union (Soviet Union after 1922) government sent representatives to China to help establish the Communist Party of China and formulate theoretical strategies. Direct participation in the establishment of a revolutionary United front in cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, and other activities to help and guide the Chinese revolution. From 1920 to 1927 the failure of the National Revolution, the longest time to come to China was Borotin and Vijinski. In the research of the relationship between Comintern and Chinese revolution, the academic circles have written a lot on the representative of Comintern in China, and a considerable amount of research has been done on Borotin and Vickingski, but there has not been a comparative study of the two. Therefore, the article will be based on documents such as the Comintern International, the United Communist Party and the Chinese Revolutionary Archives and Materials Series, and on the premise of studying and understanding the relevant research results. This paper makes a comparison between Bowring and Vickensky's ideas on Chinese revolutionary issues in order to enrich and deepen the study of Comintern and Chinese Revolution from a specific angle. This paper focuses on the comparative study of the representatives of Borotin and Vickensky. The first reason is that they have been in China for a long time, and they basically went through the special and important historical period of the Chinese Revolution during their time in China. It puts forward many ideas about the basic problems of the Chinese revolution. Second, because of their special identity, their ideological behavior is closely related to the Communist International and the Soviet government, which is worthy of further study. Based on the theory and practice of the basic problems of the Chinese revolution between 1920 and 1927, this paper analyzes their ideological views on such issues as the leadership of the Chinese revolution, the United front of cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the agrarian revolution, the armed struggle, and so on. On the basis of their limited understanding and research level, the author tries to make an objective and just judgment and evaluation. The structure design of this paper is arranged according to the above several basic questions about the Chinese revolution. The purpose and academic value of this comparative study is to deepen the understanding of the close relationship between the Communist International and the Chinese Revolution, and thus deepen the understanding of the historical process in which the CPC grasps the laws of the Chinese Revolution. This paper examines the historical track of the Sinicization of Marxism from one side and deepens the understanding and understanding of the process of combining the basic principles of Marxism with the concrete reality of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D231;D16

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丁言昭;;瞿秋白與維經(jīng)斯基[J];瞿秋白研究新探;2003年01期

2 丁言昭;;瞿秋白與維經(jīng)斯基[J];瞿秋白研究新探;2003年02期

3 周利生;維經(jīng)斯基1923年11月初來過中國嗎?[J];黨史縱橫;2002年01期

4 姜建中;試評維經(jīng)斯基對中共“四大”的貢獻(xiàn)[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年06期

5 胡云霞;李紹華;;俄共(布)代表維經(jīng)斯基初次使華對中共建黨的貢獻(xiàn)[J];西南交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期

6 姜建中;;維經(jīng)斯基第四次來華時間考[J];世紀(jì)橋;2010年17期

7 方寧;;論維經(jīng)斯基對中共建黨思路的影響[J];黨的文獻(xiàn);2011年03期

8 葉介甫;;維經(jīng)斯基與中國革命[J];文史春秋;2011年12期

9 胡云霞;李紹華;;維經(jīng)斯基初次使華與馬克思主義在中國的傳播[J];社會科學(xué)家;2012年03期

10 張繼木;張昆;;組織傳播視野下維經(jīng)斯基在華新聞宣傳活動述評[J];現(xiàn)代傳播(中國傳媒大學(xué)學(xué)報);2012年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 丁言昭;;瞿秋白與維經(jīng)斯基[A];瞿秋白研究新探——紀(jì)念瞿秋白同志誕辰一百周年座談會論文集[C];1999年

2 丁言昭;;瞿秋白與維經(jīng)斯基[A];瞿秋白研究新探[C];2002年

3 丁言昭;;瞿秋白與維經(jīng)斯基[A];瞿秋白百周年紀(jì)念-全國瞿秋白生平和思想研討會論文集[C];1999年

4 丁言模;;瞿秋白與鮑羅廷[A];瞿秋白研究新探[C];2002年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 顏文軍;維經(jīng)斯基與“建黨偉業(yè)”[N];中國國防報;2011年

2 陳翔;北大紅樓與早期黨組織的不解之緣[N];中國文物報;2010年

3 黃紀(jì)凱;華僑：追隨中國共產(chǎn)黨開天辟地[N];人民日報海外版;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 崔曉東;維經(jīng)斯基有關(guān)中國革命的思想述評（1920—1927）[D];西南交通大學(xué);2003年

2 尹倩;鮑羅廷與維經(jīng)斯基有關(guān)中國革命問題思想觀點的比較研究（1920-1927）[D];西南交通大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：2241101