關(guān)于中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨理論史研究的一個(gè)基本問(wèn)題
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-06 08:54
本文選題:人類認(rèn)識(shí)能力 + 理論史。 參考:《中共黨史研究》2017年05期
【摘要】:正長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),"思想"與"理論"這一對(duì)密切相關(guān)的概念一直處于混沌不清的狀態(tài),而對(duì)何謂"理論"的本質(zhì)性認(rèn)識(shí)和定位是開(kāi)展中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨理論史研究的一個(gè)基本問(wèn)題。根據(jù)黑格爾和康德對(duì)于人類認(rèn)識(shí)能力和過(guò)程以及"理性"概念的分析,理論應(yīng)該是理性的邏輯體現(xiàn),理性的存在與否是區(qū)分"思想"和"理論"的核心要素,后者需要嚴(yán)密的概念分析和邏輯論證,
[Abstract]:For a long time, the closely related concepts of "thought" and "theory" have been in a state of confusion, and the essential understanding and orientation of what is "theory" is a basic problem in the study of the history of the Communist Party of China's theory. According to Hegel and Kant's analysis of human cognitive ability and process and the concept of "rationality", theory should be the logical embodiment of rationality, and the existence of rationality is the core element to distinguish "thought" and "theory". The latter requires rigorous conceptual analysis and logical argumentation.
【分類號(hào)】:D239
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 吳長(zhǎng)青;;理性與迷信[J];民主與科學(xué);2011年01期
2 王長(zhǎng)發(fā);;法學(xué)分類方法的局限性及其克服[J];黑龍江社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年04期
3 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號(hào):1851644
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/1851644.html
最近更新
教材專著