【摘要】：伴隨網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的持續(xù)發(fā)展和計算機的普及，互聯(lián)網(wǎng)早已深入到社會發(fā)展的各個方面，對社會公眾的生活產(chǎn)生了不容忽視的重大影響。人們在享受互聯(lián)網(wǎng)海量信息資源給生活帶來的高度便利的同時，也不得不面對頻發(fā)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)問題。著作權(quán)侵權(quán)法律問題雖然早已產(chǎn)生，但計算機復(fù)制技術(shù)的發(fā)展讓網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的作品面臨更高的侵權(quán)風(fēng)險。著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的大幅“放大”引發(fā)了社會各界的廣泛關(guān)注，而此問題的焦點就在于網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的認定。由于存在于網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中，網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)具有不同于傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的特征，侵權(quán)形式多樣，更是給立法帶來了新的考驗。網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)用戶、著作權(quán)人三方的利益有待立法予以平衡。我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任立法雖在不斷的進步，但是仍有諸多未盡完善之處，如立法效力層級偏低、具體規(guī)則不甚明晰等。 為厘清這些問題，本文以“百度文庫侵權(quán)門”中存在的法律問題分析為切入點，對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者及其侵權(quán)責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)進行探討，于國際立法中尋找可借鑒經(jīng)驗，并對我國相關(guān)法律制度進分析，總結(jié)不足之處，進而對法律制度的完善提出部分構(gòu)想。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外，總共包括五個部分： 第一部分，詳細介紹“百度文庫侵權(quán)門”事件發(fā)展脈絡(luò)以及作家聯(lián)盟訴百度案件判決結(jié)果，，提出對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的幾點法律思考。 第二部分，闡述了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的定義及其種類、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的概念及特點，并對其需要承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的三點法理依據(jù)進行探討。 第三部分，考察國外相關(guān)立法經(jīng)驗，比較美國、德國、歐盟、日本在此問題上的同異，從歸責(zé)原則和免責(zé)條件兩個方面總結(jié)可為我國借鑒的經(jīng)驗。 第四部分，結(jié)合我國相關(guān)立法對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則、責(zé)任認定、責(zé)任形態(tài)以及免責(zé)事由進行逐一分析，并在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)我國立法的缺失之處。 第五部分，提出對我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任基本制度的完善建議，包括歸責(zé)原則、懲罰性損害賠償?shù)囊�、著作�?quán)侵權(quán)比對制度的建立，并對網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)創(chuàng)新保護進行制度探索。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of network technology and the popularization of computer, the Internet has already penetrated into all aspects of social development, which has had a great impact on the life of the public. People not only enjoy the high convenience brought by the massive information resources of the Internet, but also have to face the frequent network infringement problem. Although the legal problems of copyright infringement have long arisen, the development of computer replication technology makes the works in cyberspace face higher infringement risk. The large "magnification" of copyright infringement in cyberspace has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life, and the focus of this problem lies in the identification of copyright infringement liability of network service providers. Because it exists in cyberspace, the copyright infringement of network service providers is different from the traditional copyright infringement, and the forms of infringement are various, which brings a new test to the legislation. The interests of network service providers, Internet users and copyright owners need to be balanced by legislation. Although the legislation of copyright infringement liability of network service providers in China is making continuous progress, there are still many imperfections, such as the low level of legislative effectiveness, the lack of clarity of specific rules and so on. In order to clarify these problems, this paper takes the analysis of the legal problems existing in Baidu Library Tort door as the starting point, probes into the theoretical basis of network service providers and their tort liability, finds out the experience that can be used for reference in international legislation, analyzes the relevant legal systems in our country, sums up the shortcomings, and then puts forward some ideas for the perfection of the legal system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of five parts: the first part introduces in detail the development of "Baidu Library infringement door" and the judgment results of the Writers Alliance v. Baidu case, and puts forward some legal thoughts on the copyright infringement liability of network service providers. The second part expounds the definition and types of the network service provider, the concept and characteristics of the copyright infringement liability of the network service provider, and probes into the three legal basis of the infringement liability of the network service provider. The third part examines the relevant legislative experience of foreign countries, compares the similarities and differences of the United States, Germany, the European Union and Japan on this issue, and summarizes the experiences that can be used for reference by our country from two aspects: the principle of imputation and the condition of exemption. The fourth part, combined with the relevant legislation of our country to the network service provider copyright infringement imputation principle, liability cognizance, the liability form and the exemption matter carries on the analysis one by one, and on this basis summarizes the lack of our country legislation. The fifth part puts forward some suggestions on the basic system of copyright infringement liability of network service providers in our country, including the principle of imputation, the introduction of punitive damages, the establishment of copyright infringement comparison system, and the exploration of the system of network copyright innovation protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41;D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 屈茂輝;;論民法上的注意義務(wù)[J];北方法學(xué);2007年01期

2 吳漢東;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法視野下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期

3 汪波;試論網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的法律保護[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期

4 張麗波;馬海群;周麗霞;;避風(fēng)港原則適用性研究及立法建議——由百度文庫侵權(quán)案件說起[J];圖書情報知識;2013年01期

5 吳漢東;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];中國法學(xué);2011年02期

6 楊立新;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》規(guī)定的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的理解與解釋[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

本文編號：2500943